Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

The Term “Organic” Losing its Luster

I’ve watched the organic farming movement with interest over the past 10 years or so. It’s not because I have any philosophical motivation to become an organic producer – I’m interested because smaller scale crop operations have to look for every opportunity to derive more revenue and margin from every acre.

I have great respect for those producers who make the commitment to an organic production system and make it work. It requires a significant step-up in management and there is a steep learning curve to farming without herbicides and chemical fertilizers.

Having said this, I’ve not made the jump for a number of reasons. Time and labor constraints being one – I’m not sure that I could be as efficient as I am now, and hiring more labor is not an attractive option for me. Secondly, I’ve been somewhat skeptical about the future of organic premiums and here’s why. Organic farming is not unlike any other innovative production system, whether it be no-till, strip-till or some other alternative to traditional methods. The common path is that smaller scale, innovative producers latch on to an idea, work to perfect it and learn all the hard lessons as they cut the path. Early adopters watch from the sidelines, and when there is a reasonable expectation for success, they jump in and improve on the process and take it to a larger scale. Ultimately, large scale conventional producers look at the economics and realize that their economies of scale enable them to derive larger benefits from the innovation and they go for it.

This pattern holds for organic food production, or at least it was headed in that direction. The strange thing about organic farming is that it brings with it a lot of philosophical and emotional baggage. Many people have difficulty looking at it as simply another production/business model. For some, a move to organic is all about a deep seated mistrust of major agri-business corporations. For others, it’s about a perceived benefit to the environment. It can be even be a lifestyle choice. For me, it would be all about profitability.

I’ll admit I’m less interested in organic production than I was a couple of years ago. The fickle consumer is showing less enthusiasm for more expensive organic food as the recession hits many food buyers in the pocketbook. Also, the marketers have been quick to grab the word “organic” so it’s difficult for consumers to know what the word really means anymore. Recently I heard of an individual selling “organic” firewood at a local folk festival – sheesh. And a recent study by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine found no real nutritional advantage to organic food compared to conventional.

But the real deterrent for me is the simple fact that as large scale producers enter the organic realm, per unit premiums for organic production will also come down. There are organizations that say a 12,000 head organic dairy farm is not what the organic movement is all about, but if Wal-Mart is going to sell organic milk, it’s going to come from large production units. Supply and demand rules, whether it’s organic or not and there is no way to regulate this sector to keep the big guys out.

For now, I’m on the sidelines. Nothing against the organic business model, but it’s not for me at this point.

What about you? Have you moved to an organic program? Have you considered a shift to organic? Will this niche market continue to grow or suffer some speed bumps?

Click here to join the discussion.

Peter Gredig
Farms.com Media
Peter.Gredig@Farms.com

Follow me on Twitter – I’m Agwag!

This commentary is for informational purposes only. The opinions and comments expressed herein represent the opinions of the author--they do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Farms.com. This commentary is not intended to provide individual advice to anyone. Farms.com will not be liable for any errors or omissions in the information, or for any damages or losses in any way related to this commentary.

Views: 27

Reply to This

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Welcoming input on watershed plan

Members of the public are invited to an open house to learn about the development of a Xwulqw’selu (Koksilah) Watershed and Water Sustainability Plan, and provide input to help guide long-term approaches to water supply and ecosystem health in the area. The open house will take place on Wednesday, March 11, 2026, from 3-6 p.m. at The Hub at Cowichan Station, 2375 Koksilah Road in the Cowichan Valley. The B.C. government and Cowichan Tribes are leading the development of the plan, building on several years of engagement with community members, farmers and industry through local advisory tables, such as the Cowichan Tribes Guidance Group and the Community Collaborative Advisory Table. This project has been supported by the Ministry of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship, and the Ministry of Agriculture and Food to gather and analyze information and develop options related to water allocation, watershed restoration priorities and land-use recommendations. Engaging with the community

Protect AAFC Research, Not Bureaucracy: Why Farmers Need Smart Fiscal Discipline

As Ottawa looks for savings, industry leaders argue cuts should target administrative overhead — not the public agricultural research that delivers higher yields, stronger varieties and real returns for Canadian farmers. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada’s (AAFC) plan to close research stations across multiple provinces targets the very infrastructure that underpins Canada’s agricultural competitiveness while leaving the department’s growing administrative overhead largely untouched. No one disputes the need for fiscal discipline. But cutting front-line science that consistently delivers some of the highest returns of any public investment is not fiscal responsibility; it’s short-term thinking. AAFC’s regional research network is Canada’s only coordinated system capable of evaluating new crop genetics and management practices across diverse agro-ecological zones. These sites generate the multi-location, multi-year data that determine whether a new variety actually performs under heat

EMILI wins Ecosystem Builder Award at the 2026 DARE Innovation Awards

EMILI was honoured to be awarded the Ecosystem Builder Award at the inaugural DARE Innovation Awards in Winnipeg, Manitoba, on February 24, 2026. The DARE Innovation Awards, hosted by North Forge, celebrated Manitoba’s entrepreneurial excellence and innovation, recognizing bold vision, transformative leadership and lasting impact. The Ecosystem Builder Award, which EMILI was shortlisted for alongside Adam Kelly of Social Entrepreneurship Enclave and Paul Card of Manitoba Innovates, honours a leader, mentor or organization dedicated to growing and supporting Manitoba’s innovation ecosystem. “It is a privilege to be recognized alongside such a talented group of Manitoba innovators, and we are honoured to be shortlisted as ecosystem builders alongside Paul Card and Adam Kelly, two individuals we have so much respect and appreciation for,” said Jennifer Cox, communications manager with EMILI during the award acceptance speech. A key place EMILI supports Manitoba’s innovation ecosystem i

Ag included in Carney’s trip to Japan

Canada is committed to being a reliable trade partner with Japan

RB Global purchases BigIron Auction Company

The transaction helps RB Global’s expansion into the U.S.

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service