Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

The Term “Organic” Losing its Luster

I’ve watched the organic farming movement with interest over the past 10 years or so. It’s not because I have any philosophical motivation to become an organic producer – I’m interested because smaller scale crop operations have to look for every opportunity to derive more revenue and margin from every acre.

I have great respect for those producers who make the commitment to an organic production system and make it work. It requires a significant step-up in management and there is a steep learning curve to farming without herbicides and chemical fertilizers.

Having said this, I’ve not made the jump for a number of reasons. Time and labor constraints being one – I’m not sure that I could be as efficient as I am now, and hiring more labor is not an attractive option for me. Secondly, I’ve been somewhat skeptical about the future of organic premiums and here’s why. Organic farming is not unlike any other innovative production system, whether it be no-till, strip-till or some other alternative to traditional methods. The common path is that smaller scale, innovative producers latch on to an idea, work to perfect it and learn all the hard lessons as they cut the path. Early adopters watch from the sidelines, and when there is a reasonable expectation for success, they jump in and improve on the process and take it to a larger scale. Ultimately, large scale conventional producers look at the economics and realize that their economies of scale enable them to derive larger benefits from the innovation and they go for it.

This pattern holds for organic food production, or at least it was headed in that direction. The strange thing about organic farming is that it brings with it a lot of philosophical and emotional baggage. Many people have difficulty looking at it as simply another production/business model. For some, a move to organic is all about a deep seated mistrust of major agri-business corporations. For others, it’s about a perceived benefit to the environment. It can be even be a lifestyle choice. For me, it would be all about profitability.

I’ll admit I’m less interested in organic production than I was a couple of years ago. The fickle consumer is showing less enthusiasm for more expensive organic food as the recession hits many food buyers in the pocketbook. Also, the marketers have been quick to grab the word “organic” so it’s difficult for consumers to know what the word really means anymore. Recently I heard of an individual selling “organic” firewood at a local folk festival – sheesh. And a recent study by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine found no real nutritional advantage to organic food compared to conventional.

But the real deterrent for me is the simple fact that as large scale producers enter the organic realm, per unit premiums for organic production will also come down. There are organizations that say a 12,000 head organic dairy farm is not what the organic movement is all about, but if Wal-Mart is going to sell organic milk, it’s going to come from large production units. Supply and demand rules, whether it’s organic or not and there is no way to regulate this sector to keep the big guys out.

For now, I’m on the sidelines. Nothing against the organic business model, but it’s not for me at this point.

What about you? Have you moved to an organic program? Have you considered a shift to organic? Will this niche market continue to grow or suffer some speed bumps?

Click here to join the discussion.

Peter Gredig
Farms.com Media
Peter.Gredig@Farms.com

Follow me on Twitter – I’m Agwag!

This commentary is for informational purposes only. The opinions and comments expressed herein represent the opinions of the author--they do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Farms.com. This commentary is not intended to provide individual advice to anyone. Farms.com will not be liable for any errors or omissions in the information, or for any damages or losses in any way related to this commentary.

Views: 25

Reply to This

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Trade with China

China’s Anti-Discrimination Investigation On March 8, 2025, China’s Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) announced the outcome of its anti-discrimination investigation initiated in September 2024 as a result of the federal government’s imposition of tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, steel and aluminum. In response to Canada, China’s State Council Tariff Commission will impose a 100 per cent tariff rate on Canadian canola oil and canola meal along with several other tariffs on other Canadian agricultural commodities as of March 20, 2025. Tariffs from the State Council Tariff Commission resulting from the anti-discrimination investigation are separate and distinct from China’s anti-dumping investigation into imports of Canadian canola seed which is ongoing. China’s Anti-Dumping Investigation On August 12, 2025, China’s Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) announced its preliminary ruling as part of its anti-dumping investigation into Canadian canola seed imports. In its ruling, MOFCOM announce

Advocating for Trade and Market Diversification on The Hill

Canadian canola farmers are navigating major trade volatility. Ongoing tariffs have closed access to China, once a $4.9 billion market, while uncertainty around the upcoming Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) review is putting Canada’s two largest export markets under pressure. At the same time, Canada’s growing biofuels sector offers a valuable opportunity for canola farmers. With strong policy support, biofuels can drive new domestic demand for canola and reduce farmers’ exposure to trade disruptions. Canada’s canola farmers rely on predictable market access. These shifts show how quickly geopolitical issues and national policies can ripple back to the farm gate.  As the national representative of Canada’s 40,000 canola farmers, Canadian Canola Growers Association (CCGA) has been front and centre with the federal government, calling for a political solution to the China tariff dispute and for a canola-friendly biofuels policy.  Canola’s Annual Lobby Day Every year, the Board o

Revitalizing rural and agricultural infrastructure

Since 2023, Alberta’s government has taken action to support ag societies through the Agricultural Societies Infrastructure Revitalization Program, strengthening the quality of life in rural communities. The program has delivered $7.5 million in total grants for 106 ag society projects over the past three years, including funds allocated this year. This funding has helped ag societies with improvements and repairs to commercial kitchens, roofs, horse riding arenas and heating and ventilation in ice rinks, and has increased accessibility and energy efficiency in rural facilities. Alberta’s rural communities need up-to-date facilities to promote community involvement and economic growth. These buildings are central hubs, offering residents the opportunity to gather, engage and connect with their neighbours. “Ag societies have an important role in the quality of life for Alberta villages, towns and rural communities. Throughout the year they welcome Albertans to community events, from l

Canada makes commitments to international ag

Canada will spend almost $400 million to support farmers around the world

Growth Promoters and the Environment Revisited

In October 2021, this column described a research project that examined how long residues from growth promoters persist in the feedlot environment. They learned that residues from trenbolone acetate (TBA; used in some growth implants to mimic testosterone) and melengestrol acetate (MGA; sometimes fed to heifers to suppress estrus) dissipate very quickly after they’re excreted. However, residues from ractopamine (a feed additive that improves feed efficiency, weight gain and leanness late in the feeding period) could be found on the pen floor for up to five months after it was last fed. Jon Challis and collaborators at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and the University of Saskatchewan recently published a follow-up study to learn whether manure composting, stockpiling or soil incorporation help break down ractopamine residues and whether ractopamine residues can affect hormone levels in other organisms that may come in contact with them in the environment (“Chemical and bioassay-based

© 2025   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service