Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

NFU-Ontario Disappointed with OMAFRA Tribunal Decision to Dismiss FRFOF Application. How do you feel about it?

COLLABORATION BETWEEN NFU-O AND NFU CONTINUES:

JOINT RESPONSE TO TRIBUNAL DECISION

NFU News Release. 

 

Saskatoon, SK and Lakeside, ON - The NFU-O/NFU is extremely disappointed with the OMAFRA Appeals Tribunal decision to dismiss the NFU-O's application under the Farm Registration and Farm Organizations Funding (FRFOF) Act, 1993. The Rules of Procedure of the Tribunal state that reasons for a decision will be sent to all parties within twenty calendar days of a hearing. As of January 9, 2013, the only information the NFU-O has received from the Tribunal following our December 14, 2012 hearing is the December 19 notice of the dismissal of our application. Without access to the reasons for the negative decision, the NFU cannot respond to the rationale for that decision and cannot make informed decisions on next steps for the organization.

 

A couple of points should be noted in regard to the dismissal of the NFU-O's accreditation application. First, in November 2012, the minister amended the regulations under the FRFOF Act. This allowed the other two general farm organizations to move ahead with a new application under the amended regulation. Interim orders issued by the Tribunal in November, 2012 prevented the NFU-O from moving ahead in the same manner under the amended regulations. The Minister's legal counsel supported the NFU-O's accreditation application at the December 14 hearing.

 

Second, over 2,000 farmers in Ontario have chosen the NFU-O to represent their interests since 2002, when the NFU-O was first accredited under the FRFOF Act, 1993. These Ontario farmers have now lost the option to choose the general farm organization that best represents their interests through the Farm Business Registration (FBR) program, and must undertake a time-consuming process to join the NFU.   

 

The National Farmers Union of Canada is truly a national organization. While its head office is in Saskatoon, all areas of Canada are reflected in its policies. We stand for farmers, whether they are in PEI, New Brunswick, Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta or BC, and whether they produce potatoes, grains, beef, milk cows, vegetables or other products. Again and always, the NFU speaks in the farmer’s interest. The NFU-O's relationship to the national organization was accepted by several Tribunal panels since 2002. The relationship with the NFU allows the NFU-O to address the concerns of Ontario family farmers at local, provincial, national and international levels. 

 

The problem for some, whether in government, in tribunals or outside of the NFU, is that the NFU unwaveringly speaks truth to power. And this appears to be our crime. Our analysis and effort to advance the interests of farm families across the country are second to none. The quality of our research, the thoroughness of our reading of trade agreements, legislation and regulation are unmatched. We understand completely the power imbalances that seek to exploit family farmers and ordinary citizens, and as such, we have many powerful and wealthy enemies. This has never bothered us, nor slowed us down in speaking the truth.

 

We stand toe-to-toe with multinational grain companies, seed and chemical companies and government, and have never been silenced. Others have erroneously collaborated with these same players, either directly or passively, to the ultimate harm of farmers. The NFU has never been in that position – where it could be accused of collaborating to the ultimate harm of farmers. In fact, the NFU’s policy analysis has been prescient and proven accurate with the passage of time on issues such as cattle production, UPOV ’91, the impact of trade deals on farmers and farm debt.

 

Farmers are better off because of the NFU, retaining the right to save, use, exchange and sell seed, stopping the release of GE wheat, and benefiting from our efforts to retain the single desk wheat board for decades. Had other organizations been as steadfast in protecting farmers’ rights, we would still have small abattoirs, the single desk CWB, a strong Canadian Grain Commission, and much less concentration and vertical integration in the beef and hog production and packing industries or among input suppliers.

 

The NFU will continue both to exist and to represent farmers in Ontario, as well as across the country. We are not going away.  Ontario farmers who want the National Farmers Union to continue to advocate on their behalf, will now need to go to the hassle of joining another farm organization to get their FBR number, requesting a refund from that organization and turning around to send their membership fee directly to the NFU-O. Resources that should be used to advocate for policies that support family farms will now be used to inform farmers about how they can continue to be members of their chosen general farm organization.

 

Views: 216

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Many believe that the key to re-accreditation for the NFU-O is that they be less vocal about issues that affect their membership, instead showing a preference for assuming positions that do not cause waves in mainstream agriculture.

Their past accomplishments have very likely offended too many of the wrong interests, hence the snub from a tribunal that is not immune to outside pressure.

 Goes to show that honesty is always rewarded, just not necessarily as it deserves.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Maizex Seeds Breaks Ground on $8.8 Million State-of-the-Art Seed Corn Facility in Blenheim

Maizex Seeds has announced an $8.8 million investment in a new seed corn processing and packaging facility at its Blenheim, Ontario.

Pulse Market Insight #288

Crop Prospects for 2026 This seems to be the time of year when there’s a flood of reports looking back at the past year or gazing ahead to the new year. While looking backward allows a person to gauge their grain marketing performance, hindsight generally doesn’t provide much help for making decisions about the upcoming year. In fact, every marketing year is different. Making next year’s decisions based on last year’s successes or failures can be counterproductive. After all, acreage will shift and while there are always hopes for big yields, the odds of record output happening again in 2026 are very unlikely. In addition, global trade will also change (hopefully for the better) and affect next year’s market prospects. This is also the time of year when we start thinking about farmers’ planting decisions for next spring. There are many factors going into those decisions, especially crop rotation considerations, but prices and profitability are also important. Typically, we use basic

Tariffs, policy changes and a record crop: APAS reflects on 2025

The President of the Agricultural Producers Association of Saskatchewan (APAS) described 2025 as a busy one with no shortage of challenges and some good news sprinkled in. Bill Prybylski did a year-end interview with Ryan Young, host of SaskAgToday and Ag News Director of 620 CKRM. You can find the full interview on SaskAgToday.com under the unfiltered section.   Prybylski said tariffs from the United States, China, and India - three of Canada's major trading partners - was the number one issue for APAS in terms of resources used to understand the impact on farmers and lobbying efforts.   Currently, China has tariffs on Canadian canola oil, seed, meal, yellow peas, seafood and pork. The U.S. currently has tariffs on Canadian lumber, upholstered wood products, and any product non-compliant with the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). India has an import duty on yellow peas from all countries, including Canada. Canada has counter-tariffs on American steel, aluminium, and aut

Year-End Ag and Energy Markets Face Broad Commodity Pressure

Weekly market data for late 2025 shows year-end liquidation and global supply gluts pressuring soybeans, wheat, and crude oil, while gold reaches record highs.

China might start importing corn and wheat

What happens with the wheat market going forward largely depends on China, says an analyst. Canadian farmers harvested a record 40 million tonnes of wheat in 2025, including 29.3 million tonnes of spring wheat. The good news is that exports have been surpassing last year’s record pace so far in 2025-26. Chuck Penner, analyst with LeftField Commodity Research, thinks exports could hit a record 24 million tonnes, although it is still early days. The problem with this year’s wheat market is that there was record production by the top seven exporters. Minneapolis wheat futures have been relatively flat despite the global glut of the commodity, indicating that something is going on with the demand side of the ledger. Penner said China has not been getting enough attention. There are reports of significant quality losses with China’s corn and spring wheat crops. China’s farmers just finished harvest, and corn and wheat prices are already starting to rebound, suggesting that domestic s

© 2025   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service