Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

NFU-Ontario Disappointed with OMAFRA Tribunal Decision to Dismiss FRFOF Application. How do you feel about it?

COLLABORATION BETWEEN NFU-O AND NFU CONTINUES:

JOINT RESPONSE TO TRIBUNAL DECISION

NFU News Release. 

 

Saskatoon, SK and Lakeside, ON - The NFU-O/NFU is extremely disappointed with the OMAFRA Appeals Tribunal decision to dismiss the NFU-O's application under the Farm Registration and Farm Organizations Funding (FRFOF) Act, 1993. The Rules of Procedure of the Tribunal state that reasons for a decision will be sent to all parties within twenty calendar days of a hearing. As of January 9, 2013, the only information the NFU-O has received from the Tribunal following our December 14, 2012 hearing is the December 19 notice of the dismissal of our application. Without access to the reasons for the negative decision, the NFU cannot respond to the rationale for that decision and cannot make informed decisions on next steps for the organization.

 

A couple of points should be noted in regard to the dismissal of the NFU-O's accreditation application. First, in November 2012, the minister amended the regulations under the FRFOF Act. This allowed the other two general farm organizations to move ahead with a new application under the amended regulation. Interim orders issued by the Tribunal in November, 2012 prevented the NFU-O from moving ahead in the same manner under the amended regulations. The Minister's legal counsel supported the NFU-O's accreditation application at the December 14 hearing.

 

Second, over 2,000 farmers in Ontario have chosen the NFU-O to represent their interests since 2002, when the NFU-O was first accredited under the FRFOF Act, 1993. These Ontario farmers have now lost the option to choose the general farm organization that best represents their interests through the Farm Business Registration (FBR) program, and must undertake a time-consuming process to join the NFU.   

 

The National Farmers Union of Canada is truly a national organization. While its head office is in Saskatoon, all areas of Canada are reflected in its policies. We stand for farmers, whether they are in PEI, New Brunswick, Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta or BC, and whether they produce potatoes, grains, beef, milk cows, vegetables or other products. Again and always, the NFU speaks in the farmer’s interest. The NFU-O's relationship to the national organization was accepted by several Tribunal panels since 2002. The relationship with the NFU allows the NFU-O to address the concerns of Ontario family farmers at local, provincial, national and international levels. 

 

The problem for some, whether in government, in tribunals or outside of the NFU, is that the NFU unwaveringly speaks truth to power. And this appears to be our crime. Our analysis and effort to advance the interests of farm families across the country are second to none. The quality of our research, the thoroughness of our reading of trade agreements, legislation and regulation are unmatched. We understand completely the power imbalances that seek to exploit family farmers and ordinary citizens, and as such, we have many powerful and wealthy enemies. This has never bothered us, nor slowed us down in speaking the truth.

 

We stand toe-to-toe with multinational grain companies, seed and chemical companies and government, and have never been silenced. Others have erroneously collaborated with these same players, either directly or passively, to the ultimate harm of farmers. The NFU has never been in that position – where it could be accused of collaborating to the ultimate harm of farmers. In fact, the NFU’s policy analysis has been prescient and proven accurate with the passage of time on issues such as cattle production, UPOV ’91, the impact of trade deals on farmers and farm debt.

 

Farmers are better off because of the NFU, retaining the right to save, use, exchange and sell seed, stopping the release of GE wheat, and benefiting from our efforts to retain the single desk wheat board for decades. Had other organizations been as steadfast in protecting farmers’ rights, we would still have small abattoirs, the single desk CWB, a strong Canadian Grain Commission, and much less concentration and vertical integration in the beef and hog production and packing industries or among input suppliers.

 

The NFU will continue both to exist and to represent farmers in Ontario, as well as across the country. We are not going away.  Ontario farmers who want the National Farmers Union to continue to advocate on their behalf, will now need to go to the hassle of joining another farm organization to get their FBR number, requesting a refund from that organization and turning around to send their membership fee directly to the NFU-O. Resources that should be used to advocate for policies that support family farms will now be used to inform farmers about how they can continue to be members of their chosen general farm organization.

 

Views: 220

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Many believe that the key to re-accreditation for the NFU-O is that they be less vocal about issues that affect their membership, instead showing a preference for assuming positions that do not cause waves in mainstream agriculture.

Their past accomplishments have very likely offended too many of the wrong interests, hence the snub from a tribunal that is not immune to outside pressure.

 Goes to show that honesty is always rewarded, just not necessarily as it deserves.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Agriculture Day Highlights the Importance of Public Research for Prairie Farmers

As Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) works through research and staffing changes, clear communication will be key for Alberta farmers and seed developers as they plan for the next phase of Canadian agricultural innovation. Today’s Agriculture Day is a good moment to recognize the people, partnerships, and public institutions that keep Canadian agriculture competitive, resilient, and innovative. It’s also a natural time to reflect on how agricultural research in Canada is changing, and why transparency and communication matter to the people who rely on that work every season. AAFC is currently in a period of transition. Like many federal departments, it is navigating workforce adjustments and internal decisions that will shape how its research programs operate in the years ahead. So far, aside from occasional confirmations to media about closures and layoffs, AAFC has not publicly released formal details on the changes underway. That’s understandable. Staff deserve time to make

Register today: SeedWorld Webinar

Save your spot AAFC research cuts have put new pressure on Canada’s plant breeding pipeline — especially in Western Canada, where crop innovation is essential to competitiveness, diversification, and long-term resilience. This webinar convenes leaders from across the seed and crop development system to ask a simple question: If we could design the ideal plant breeding model for Western Canada today, what would it look like? If Canada wants to remain globally competitive, plant breeding can’t be treated as optional infrastructure. This session is a timely conversation about what needs to change — and what could be built.   Attendees can expect to learn: How AAFC research cuts are impacting plant breeding in Western Canada What an “ideal world” plant breeding system could look like today Why a producer-driven, not-for-profit model is gaining attention How plant breeding can be funded sustainably for the long term What needs to change to keep Canada globally competitive in crop innova

Ag in federal NDP leadership candidate plans

Rob Ashton, the national president of the International Longshore Workers Union, addresses ag through an indirect proposal

Indoor Berry Farming Without Bees

Montel and TMU have partnered to test airflow-based pollination technology at MoFarm, aiming to produce indoor berries without bees and strengthen Canada’s year-round food production system.

Market Outlook - Wheat

Bids to Canadian prairie producers have been relatively flat with basis improvements being thrown at producer bids to entice product into the system when needed on futures drops. The market sits comfortably for the time being but will keep its focus onto winter wheat conditions in Black Sea, European Union and United States when they do begin to break dormancy into April. The crops in these regions are believed to have escaped the worst of the winterkill scenarios mid January. Some drought issues in the U.S. winter wheat growing region and some mixed state-by-state analytics in the periodical updates provided on the overwintering crop. Once dormancy breaks, that’s when we will know the best and the market will likely stay sideways until it gets a solid feel of what that crop looks like. Aside from this, demand drive is what the market will need to see to chew away at some of the increased stocks that have ended up on the global balance sheet. As for Western Canadian wheat values, we ar

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service