Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

Will Kathleen Wynne be a good minister of agriculture?

I thought this was a good idea when I first heard it.

But judging by the negative comments and stories I am not too sure.

What does everyone else think?  Will she have time to be Premier of Ontario and also do the job as Minister of Agriculture justice?

Views: 1088

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Joann on February 15, 2013 at 4:51am

Will Ms. Wynne be a good minister of Agriculture?  It would depend on her agenda to whom. 

Will she protect and serve farmers that have Sovereign duties and obligations to the domestic public or will she bow to freer global trade by dissolving our present systems, throwing domestic obligations out the window?

It would appear (if my information is correct) Mr. McGuinty signed an agreement with Mr. Harper late June of 2008.  From what we understand, a portion of the agreement affects agricultural marketing in Ontario. As Ms. Wynne was a cabinet member, I would find to hard to believe she would not know about the agreement.

Did Mr. Harper buy the very 'soul' of domestic marketing in Canada?

We have been told that the agreement does not exist only to be told by a 'friend' in CRA that the document does indeed exist but is "privileged" information and therefore cannot have access to it.

How much does Ms.Wynne know about agriculture and who will she serve?

Permalink Reply by OntAG Admin on February 15, 2013 at 10:30am

Media Release from Ag Critic Ernie Hardeman

 

Farmers Concerned about Part-Time Minister

“Wynne needs to realize that if agriculture is to survive in Ontario it does indeed need a full time Agricultural minister and one that is definitely in tune with where agriculture is and how important it is to the province.”

Eastern Ontario Farmer

 

 

WOODSTOCK – Today Ernie Hardeman, Oxford MPP and PC Critic for Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, said that he has heard from farmers from all across Ontario this week that are concerned about Premier Wynne's decision to be a part-time Minister of Agriculture.

 

“We have hundreds of different commodities here in Ontario, understanding their issues as well as the food processing industry requires a lot of time,” said Hardeman. “I’ve heard from farmers in Niagara, the Greater Toronto Area, Southwestern, Northern and Eastern Ontario who all expressed concern that the job of Agriculture Minister could not be performed part-time.”

 

Hardeman received the emails and calls from farmers following his February 11 open letter to Premier Wynne expressing reservations about her decision to serve as both Premier and Agriculture Minister and requesting a meeting to discuss agriculture issue. To date there has been no reply.

 

“Given the challenges the Premier needs to address, such as the $14 billion deficit, she will not have sufficient time to focus on the agriculture industry,” said Hardeman. “From my time as Minister of Agriculture I know that you need time to travel across the province to talk to farmers and meet with the different organizations to ensure you understand their concerns.”

 

A professional Agrologist wrote in his email: “I know from my experience working with Mr. William Stewart, Mr. Jack Riddle, Mr. David Ramsey, Mr. Elmer Buchanan and other agriculture ministers, that this responsible position requires full-time representation and long hours of work 7 days per week.”

 

The emails that Hardeman received were from farmers in a number of different commodities including: beef, pork, dairy, chickens, sheep, apples, plums, grapes, asparagus, onions, potatoes, sugarbeets, corn, soybeans, canola, ginseng, strawberries, maple syrup and flowers.

 

“The common theme in the messages is that Agriculture Minister requires a full-time commitment,” said Hardeman. “Some farmers were quite upset that they felt her decision to be a part-time Minister showed she didn’t understand or value the industry.”

 

 

 

Permalink Reply by John Schwartzentruber on February 24, 2013 at 3:10pm

The fact that we have been given a part-time and totally urbanized  Agriculture Minister merely continues to reinforce the disdain that the Liberals perennially hold for our rural ridings.

This "appointment" is clearly nothing more than a misguided attempt to ingratiate a disenfranchised segment of the electorate to a pestilent party with poisoned policies.

We have some good herbicides for the undesirable growth in our fields, but we have yet to discover the treatment for the sickening condescension and mistreatment that streams down from the big smoke into the countryside.

Permalink Reply by Roadrunner on February 24, 2013 at 5:46pm

I don't disagree with you John.

But isn't it better to have her at least briefed and spending some time on agriculture?

I am hoping that she does some good for farmers and the food industry, it is important to Ontario, it is just that Toronto people don't care or know where their food comes from.

 

Joann,

I would hope that Wynne will do what is best for Ontario and not have a predetermined agenda.

 

 

Permalink Reply by Joann on February 25, 2013 at 5:31am

That is my hope also Roadrunner..... but.... Ms. Wynne declared from the onset that she would be 'Minister of Agriculture' along with her duties as Premier.

When sworn in, she swore to uphold her duties as 'Minister of Agriculture'. 

4 days later, she saw fit to conduct a secret ceremony to uphold her duties as Minister of Agriculture and Food.

I thought it was wonderful that she at first declared to minister of "Agriculture" as the true meaning of agriculture concerns a "class of people (the farmer) working with natural resources (food).  Adding the word "food" actually takes away from domestic natural production (food).... and the word is also redundant.   Its like when she responded to the question about a heifer.  She defined a heifer as a young female cow.    I thought all cows were female.......redundancy for the sake of the urban mentality?

Where is she getting her advice concerning agriculture? If it is from the previous Premier's circle.... then we still have a HUGE problem.

Permalink Reply by OntAG Admin on February 25, 2013 at 1:01pm
Today's Twitter Post by @Kathleen_Wynne a Positive Sign

Agriculture will be a priority across our gov. We’ll soon be putting fwd a new local food act—good for our farmers, our economy, our health.

Our government will work collaboratively with Ontario’s municipalities. We’ll continue to improve roads and infrastructure.

Joined  conf. delegates this afternoon, and 20 other ministers, to share rural & agricultural perspectives:

Permalink Reply by Joann on February 25, 2013 at 2:25pm

Sorry.... been to Roma many times..... I've heard the talk about rural and local food issues.

Its just idle chatter at this point.................again.

This government needs to show a shred of respect to agriculture (farmers and the land).....enough of the talk.....now walk the walk.

I've asked 2 former ag. ministers a few questions and have not been answered to date.  Maybe our new minister can enlighten us?

1. How many Sovereign marketing licenses exist in Ontario?

2.What is the value of those licenses?

3.If all marketing licenses are dissolved and all those farmers experience a one-time capital loss, how will it affect the Province?

Two more for our new minister as she was in cabinet:

4. Explain to us why 'agriculture' in Ontario is a Public Trust? (Hint; ask Mr. Dave Hope)

5.Did Premier McGuinty sell the very soul of Ontario's agricultural marketing rights to Mr. Harper in June 2008?

I look forward to meeting Ms. Wynne some time... maybe she will have some answers.... hopefully right answers.

Permalink Reply by John Schwartzentruber on February 26, 2013 at 8:07am

"Swedes Debate Meat Tax Proposal - Western meat consumption must decrease, says Swedish Board of Agriculture"

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/world/swedes-debate-meat-tax-propos...

"Rules, taxes, and subsidies can push things in the right direction. But it's imperative that these are at an international level, otherwise there is a risk production will simply be moved where the regulations and tax burden is lightest, not where production is sustainable," Gabriella Cahlin, the board's head of marketing, said in a statement." ( http://www.thelocal.se/45746/20130122/#.US0BWTdVySo )

How many livestock producers, do you suppose, sit on the "Swedish Board of Agriculture"?  See where it leads? We already know that Wynne was in full support of forcing municipalities to accept wind turbines, through the imposition of "rules and subsidies".

Gotta cut those CO2 emissions, you see? Fight that Global Warming! (They don't seem to be aware of the increasing data that indicates that rising CO2 is a result of climate change, rather than the cause. Nor do they want to be aware of it.)

“We need to get some broad based support, to capture the public’s imagination… So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts… Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest.”
- Prof. Stephen Schneider,
Stanford Professor of Climatology,
lead author of many IPCC reports

Wynne was there when the gas plant was cancelled and she was there when the GEA was imposed on rural Ontario.

"Agriculture will be a priority across our gov." - with the Liberal track record in mind, that should scare the heck out of farmers.

"Our government will work collaboratively with Ontario’s municipalities" - just like they did when they stripped the municipalities of any authority when giving wind turbine companies the right to plant their industrial turbines anywhere they wanted.

"...to share rural & agricultural perspectives..."  Really? Friendlies only who will kiss the ring, as usual? Or did she hear the perspectives of those who are tired of having misguided and unaffordable Liberal ideology forced on them?

Color me bitter, but when a government has spent 10 years forcing an agenda that our grandchildren will not be able to pay off, I call a spade a spade.

Permalink Reply by Joann on March 13, 2013 at 1:17am

Sad to say.. but you may very well have expressed the sentiments of more farmers than I care to admit.

I believe the pattern has been set already with Ms. Wynne.

When she was sworn in as Minister of Agriculture she said she would wear 2 hats.... Agriculture and Premier of Ontario.

Yesterday, as an example, she was in London promoting jobs.  The media said the Premier of Ontario was in London.... no mention that she was also the Minister of the largest economic sector of Ontario....Agriculture.  She must have left that hat at home.

No.... Ms Wynne is commonly referred as only the Premier with little to no mention of agriculture.

It is obvious Agriculture has no representation right now as the Premier only wears the Agriculture hat during sporadic coffee breaks at best.

It is totally shameful and dishonourable that the largest economic sector has only leadership of 'convenience'.

John Schwartzentruber said:

"Swedes Debate Meat Tax Proposal - Western meat consumption must decrease, says Swedish Board of Agriculture"

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/world/swedes-debate-meat-tax-propos...

"Rules, taxes, and subsidies can push things in the right direction. But it's imperative that these are at an international level, otherwise there is a risk production will simply be moved where the regulations and tax burden is lightest, not where production is sustainable," Gabriella Cahlin, the board's head of marketing, said in a statement." ( http://www.thelocal.se/45746/20130122/#.US0BWTdVySo )

How many livestock producers, do you suppose, sit on the "Swedish Board of Agriculture"?  See where it leads? We already know that Wynne was in full support of forcing municipalities to accept wind turbines, through the imposition of "rules and subsidies".

Gotta cut those CO2 emissions, you see? Fight that Global Warming! (They don't seem to be aware of the increasing data that indicates that rising CO2 is a result of climate change, rather than the cause. Nor do they want to be aware of it.)

“We need to get some broad based support, to capture the public’s imagination… So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts… Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest.”
- Prof. Stephen Schneider,
Stanford Professor of Climatology,
lead author of many IPCC reports

Wynne was there when the gas plant was cancelled and she was there when the GEA was imposed on rural Ontario.

"Agriculture will be a priority across our gov." - with the Liberal track record in mind, that should scare the heck out of farmers.

"Our government will work collaboratively with Ontario’s municipalities" - just like they did when they stripped the municipalities of any authority when giving wind turbine companies the right to plant their industrial turbines anywhere they wanted.

"...to share rural & agricultural perspectives..."  Really? Friendlies only who will kiss the ring, as usual? Or did she hear the perspectives of those who are tired of having misguided and unaffordable Liberal ideology forced on them?

Color me bitter, but when a government has spent 10 years forcing an agenda that our grandchildren will not be able to pay off, I call a spade a spade.

▶ Reply to Discussion

RSS

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Guinness World Record attempt to take place in St. Albert on Aug. 22

?ST. ALBERT – If you have ever wanted to witness an attempt at a Guinness World Record, then you will want to be in St. Albert, Ontario on August 22 when an attempt will be made to set a record for the most plow blades pulled simultaneously.

Why Alignment Matters: Domestic Check-Off and the Import Levy

When Canadian beef producers sell cattle, they contribute to the national beef check-off. That investment supports work that benefits the broader Canadian beef industry, including market development, consumer demand, public and stakeholder engagement, and research. When beef or beef cattle are imported into Canada, an import levy is also collected. While the structure is not identical in every detail, the principle behind it is straightforward: beef marketed in Canada should help contribute to the programs that support beef demand in Canada. The national check-off paid by producers and the import levy paid on eligible imports are two parts of a broader investment approach. Together, they help ensure that both domestic beef production and imported beef products are connected to the market development work that strengthens beef’s position with Canadian consumers. For producers, the domestic cattle check-off is collected at the point of sale and includes both national and provincial po

I’ve noticed a lot of wild oat escapes in some of my fields this year; what can I do to prevent it from getting worse next year?

Despite our best efforts, sometimes even the best laid weed control plans go wrong! The first thing to remember is that not all weed escapes are created equal. In some cases, weeds can survive because of application timing issues, challenging weather conditions or late flushes that emerge after spraying. However, when weeds aren’t controlled by herbicide applications, herbicide resistance should also be on your radar. A recent survey in Manitoba found that in fields with uncontrolled wild oats, 100 per cent of populations were resistant to Group 1 products, 82 per cent were resistant to Group 2 products, and 82 per cent were resistant to both Group 1 and 2 herbicides. Those numbers show how important it is to take a closer look at wild oat weed escapes. Identifying why your herbicide failed to control wild oats is the first step toward finding a solution. Start by scouting the field to narrow down the cause. Consider factors such as application timing, weather conditions, late flush

Is fungicide actually effective on Sclerotinia head rot in sunflower?

This is one of the most difficult questions to answer because there are many things to consider. I also don’t want to be outright negative because we do still have options for sclerotinia management in sunflowers. However, management is the operative word. First of all, sclerotinia head rot infections have an interesting pathway. Spores use dead sunflower florets, plus pollen, as the base to infect a sunflower plant. The spores grow into the receptacle, infecting and decaying the entire head after a period of time. Sclerotinia wilt (basal stalk rot) and mid-stalk rot are also infected by the same sclerotinia species, but it will be via the mycelia that grow from the sclerotia bodies in the soil for basal stalk rot. Mid-stalk rot is also infected by ascospores, but this can be earlier in the season than head rot or at the same time. So, management of sclerotinia does not start at flowering. Crop rotation is the most obvious management tool that we are familiar with in sunflowers, but

Using Water More Efficiently in Beef Packing Plants

Packing plants use a time-tested approach to clean their facilities. The first step uses high-pressure hot water to remove fat and meat scraps from equipment, floors and walls. Next, surfaces are cleaned using detergent. Finally, sanitizers are used to further reduce bacterial numbers. Processing companies want to reduce water use as part of their environmental goals and to reduce energy bills. High-pressure water and steam can produce aerosols that capture bacteria and spread them throughout the plant. They can then settle on and cross-contaminate clean surfaces long after the cleaning has been completed, which complicates efforts to effectively clean facilities. Biofilms are another problem. Biofilms are colonies of bacteria surrounded by a protective layer that firmly attaches them to surfaces and shelters the bacteria from hot water, detergents and sanitizers. Biofilms are hard to remove and are commonly found in hard-to-reach places. These researchers investigated potential cro

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service