Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

This past summer has been an interesting one along the lakeshore. Living and farming in the Ashfield Twp area is particularly interesting each summer due to the influx of tourists that bring their stress and frustrations to the lakeshore for some quality recharge time. Smooth washing waves, romantic sunsets, green fields of crops, quiet countryside and tourist events.
In order to keep them coming some people suggest we need to improve our environmental standards when it comes to water quality on the nearshore area of Lake Huron. For years this has baffled the scientists as to why Lake Huron has an interesting uniqueness about it. Obviously everyone else has answers for a solution to the problem but some will not admit they are a part of the problem. You can imagine who is pointing their finger at you know who. We are each an issue at the end of the day and we each need to do our part.
Recently a letter writer to the local paper publisher (Signal Star Publishing Ltd.) wrote an interesting letter stating "we farmers would have appreciated advice". I find this mind boggling due to various reasons. A few of the reasons were listed in a letter I wrote to the editor of Better Farming Magazine titled "Clarifying the facts about E. coli in Lake Huron". Since then the letter was printed in the Focus Magazine which has a distribution area of Huron County (20,450 copies delivered) - rural and urban areas.
Within the letter I stated "Each month the Huron County Federation of Agriculture lists the dates for the local Environmental Farm Plan sessions. Most annual agriculture meetings in Huron County features someone talking about local initiatives and funding that is available for environmental stewardship programming. Each of the two local conservation authorities has staff that can assist farmers with projects that will be effective in reducing erosion and improving the environmental "footprint" of the property (and quite possibly improve productivity). The local OMAFRA office in Clinton also has staff to direct farmers on where to go or who to speak with if they want to do a project. Funding can be up to 100 per cent of the cost of the project depending on where the farmer is located in Huron County. For a few years now Huron County has a Huron Clean Water Project that provides project funding."
In the letter I sent to Focus Magazine I also referred to an article that a Signal Star reporter printed on July 8 about the funding initiatives for farmers and how we can improve our impact on water quality. So the articles are out there each year.
This past week I spoke with Lois Sinclair, Ontario Soil & Crop, who delivers the Environmental Farm Plan (EFP) to Huron County farmers. She stated that since 2005 she has numbered 700 books - the number of farmers who have actually completed the EFP sessions and filled out action plans - not necessarily the number that have participated in the class but not completed the book.
Huron County lead the way under the previous program with over $5.5 million in grants from the EFP and over 1400 projects completed. This does not include the hundreds of thousands of dollars granted from the County each year through the Huron Clean Water Project.
The EFP program has since changed going on an annual basis. Lois stated that the applications for funding under Year 1 of the four years opened on June 22, 2009. She then received a message on August 12, 2009 stating that funding was all used up.
Farmers all across this County are trying and attempting to mitigate their impact on the environment. So it really puzzles me when I read "we farmers would have appreciated advice". A Ministry of Natural Resources staff person told me they are surveying a region of the Lower Maitland watershed and they are finding similar results - a high percentage of the property owners do not know that there are programs and funding available for them - rural and non-rural.
How do we get the messages out that there is funding and assistance available, "we farmers" are spending millions of dollars to try and do our part, and finishing off the message with "we are not finished yet."?
Oh, by the way - the way I look at the numbers, Environmental Farm Plan funding has been cut by over 40%. Does that sound like environment is a concern to the government?

Views: 60

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Comment by Jacqui Laporte on March 15, 2010 at 6:41am
Lois and I would love any ideas on how to get this message out to more producers, however, perhaps it is a sign of accomplishment, when we still hold EFP workshops and 50% of the participants have never heard of it before. I would prefer to think that they are getting our message now in some way, rather than focussing on why they havent before this time.

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Map: Prairie Dryness, Drought Little Changed in May

Abnormal dryness and drought across Western Canada were little changed in May compared to a month earlier. The latest monthly update of the Canadian drought monitor shows 19% of Prairie agricultural lands were being impacted by abnormally dry or drought conditions as of the end of May. That is 2 points higher than the end of April but slightly below 21% at the end of March and sharply below 47% in February. Much of the Prairie Region received below to well below normal precipitation in May, with the Peace Region, south-central Saskatchewan, and southern Manitoba recording less than 25% of normal. On the last day of the month, however, a large storm system in Alberta produced 40 to 80 mm of precipitation alone. In east-central Alberta up to 300% of normal monthly precipitation fell in the one day. Significant rainfall was also recorded in western regions of Saskatchewan but at lower levels than in eastern Alberta, the monitor said. Temperatures were generally below normal across

U.S. Soybean Ending Stocks Steady

U.S. soybean ending stocks – both old and new-crop - were left unchanged in USDA’s June supply-demand update on Thursday. For 2026-27, USDA made no changes to the U.S. soybean balance sheet this month. Estimated production remained at 4.435 billion bu, up 173 million from 2025-26, while the crush was held at 2.75 billion bu and exports at 1.63 billion. With no changes, forecasted 2026-27 U.S. soybean ending stocks were left steady from May at 310 million, modestly below the average trade guess of 314 million bu. The USDA also kept the 2026-27 season-average farm price unchanged at $11.40/bu, up from the 2025-26 estimate of $10.40. For old-crop 2025-26 soybeans, the USDA raised crush by 20 million bu, citing stronger soybean meal exports and domestic meal use, while soybean oil use for biofuel was also increased. However, exports were lowered by 20 million bushels based on available U.S. Census data, offsetting the increase in crush and leaving ending stocks unchanged at 340 mi

Only Modest Adjustments for Old-, New-Crop U.S. Corn

The USDA left its 2026-27 U.S. corn outlook virtually unchanged this month, with the only supply-side change a 3 million-bu increase tied to a higher import forecast carried in from the old-crop balance sheet. In its June supply-demand update on Thursday, USDA left 2026-27 U.S. corn production unchanged at 15.995 billion bu, while all major demand categories were also steady. Feed and residual use was held at 6.1 billion bu, food, seed and industrial use at 6.955 billion, including 5.6 billion for ethanol, and exports at 3.15 billion. With no change in use, the small increase in 2026-27 beginning supplies carried directly into ending stocks, which were raised 3 million bu from May to 1.96 billion, slightly above the average pre-report trade guess of 1.942 billion. The season-average farm price was unchanged at $4.40/bu. Corn futures were trading about 7-8 cents/bu lower this afternoon, following the report’s noon hour EST release. For old-crop 2025-26, USDA also made only mo

Don’t miss June 12 deadline: Share your feedback on the Beef Cattle Code of Practice

Public comment period nearing close on proposed updates to national beef cattle care standards.The Beef Code outlines expected and recommended animal care practices for beef cattle. The public comment period is an opportunity for anyone who has an interest in how beef cattle are raised in Canada, including consumers, veterinarians, food service professionals, and producers, to review the draft content and share feedback. Feedback gathered through the public comment period is critical and helps determine the content of the final document. Strong producer feedback from all regions of Canada is an important step in this process. The Beef Code is meant to drive continuous improvement in animal welfare and is built to be scientifically informed, practical, and reflect societal expectations for responsible farm animal care. The Code uses an outcome-based approach that focuses on achieving successful standards while allowing for flexibility in how these outcomes are met rather than dictati

From the Government Desk: ABP keeping up momentum

Spring is always one of the best times of year in this business. Calving is underway, seed is going into the ground, and there’s a sense of momentum heading into the grazing season. This year, that momentum also includes a few policy wins worth noting. Strychnine is back in 2026! After its approval was pulled in 2023, producers have been searching for a useful option to control infestations of Richardson’s ground squirrel. If you’re impacted, you’ll know why this is a meaningful development. The rollout is still underway, with initial access expected toward the end of May. For some, that timing will miss the most effective spring window, which is frustrating. There is expected to be another opportunity later in the summer, but it won’t fully replace what many producers were hoping for this spring. That said, getting this approval across the line was no small task. This was very much an Alberta-led effort, with strong collaboration between cropping groups and ABP to build the case. A

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service