Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

Finding Efficiency Through Trade Policy Change

“Give me a level playing field and we can compete with the world’s best”

I heard this quote last September 22nd at a meeting for hog farmers set up by Ontario Pork. It was one statement that I classed as optimism in a room that was overwhelmingly negative. I can completely understand why negativity abounded at this meeting, every farmer in that room faces a very uncertain future but I want to focus on the positive.
While our farm at home is one of the many hog farms that faces that uncertain future I have a calming belief that I will still farm. I truly believe that agriculture is set to take the stage as the most important global industry as we will seek for ways to feed the growing population around the world. I also believe that Canada’s role in alleviating the global food crisis will hinge on our willingness to liberalize inefficient policies that abound in Canadian ag policy.

I chose to open with that quote from the meeting because I feel that Canada would thrive in a world of free competition, there is no nation in the world better suited for agricultural production. When you couple our natural resources with our comprehensive infrastructure of supporting businesses and extensive research and knowledge bases, Canada has the potential to be an agricultural superpower. If we were ever allowed to compete in a free market, Canadian farmers would thrive. That being said, if we want a free market then we should become leaders for others around the world: step up and eliminate policies in our own country that harm producers in other regions. This attitude may not be popular with producers in certain sectors of Canadian agriculture that benefit from protectionism but I want you to consider this simple fact: Canada can produce more food that it can ever hope to consume; is it not our responsibility to explore how to make our system more efficient in hopes of feeding people around the world.

As a person coming from a free market industry, we have shown that we can compete with the world’s best. Canadian hog producers are among the lowest cost producers in the world and I firmly believe that in a world of free competition we would not be suffering right now. This feeling is probably shared by a US dairy producer facing financial ruin. It stings when you work to be a world leader in terms of efficiency, only to see your hard work destroyed by protectionist policies of your trading partners.

While my feelings on trade liberalization are probably not shared by many in the agricultural community we must consider that we are an incredibly small portion of the population and I don’t feel that it is socially responsible when we benefit at the expense of others. Consider the supply managed industries: not only do they harm the Canadian consumer; they also harm producers in other nations. Is it fair that Canadian dairy producers are making a profit because of protectionism when farmers across the border in Michigan are in danger of losing their livelihood? This problem even exists within our own borders here in Canada. Hog producers in Ontario are struggling to survive while producers in Quebec benefit from provincial subsidies and then dump their product into Ontario. If we as Canadian producers ever tried to do to other trading partners what Quebec producers do to Ontario producers we would be hit with a trade challenge the minute our goods crosses our border and the practice would have to stop.

On a larger scale, we must consider that in the global population is going to grow to 9 billion within the next 40 years with the majority of this growth coming in developing nations that lack the ability to feed themselves. While production efficiencies are important, they are only part of the equation. Efficiencies will also have to be found through the liberalization of trade. Canada has an opportunity to be a world leader in this regard. While there would be much pain for producers here in Canada in the short term if protectionist policies were eliminated, in the end it would benefit both the Canadian producer and consumers.

Views: 103

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Comment by Christine Schoonderwoerd on October 26, 2009 at 6:34am
Great article, Stew, I always love reading your posts. I guess the obvious question here is how can we quit being on the losing end of trade barriers and Quebec's government subsidies?

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Guinness World Record attempt to take place in St. Albert on Aug. 22

?ST. ALBERT – If you have ever wanted to witness an attempt at a Guinness World Record, then you will want to be in St. Albert, Ontario on August 22 when an attempt will be made to set a record for the most plow blades pulled simultaneously.

Why Alignment Matters: Domestic Check-Off and the Import Levy

When Canadian beef producers sell cattle, they contribute to the national beef check-off. That investment supports work that benefits the broader Canadian beef industry, including market development, consumer demand, public and stakeholder engagement, and research. When beef or beef cattle are imported into Canada, an import levy is also collected. While the structure is not identical in every detail, the principle behind it is straightforward: beef marketed in Canada should help contribute to the programs that support beef demand in Canada. The national check-off paid by producers and the import levy paid on eligible imports are two parts of a broader investment approach. Together, they help ensure that both domestic beef production and imported beef products are connected to the market development work that strengthens beef’s position with Canadian consumers. For producers, the domestic cattle check-off is collected at the point of sale and includes both national and provincial po

I’ve noticed a lot of wild oat escapes in some of my fields this year; what can I do to prevent it from getting worse next year?

Despite our best efforts, sometimes even the best laid weed control plans go wrong! The first thing to remember is that not all weed escapes are created equal. In some cases, weeds can survive because of application timing issues, challenging weather conditions or late flushes that emerge after spraying. However, when weeds aren’t controlled by herbicide applications, herbicide resistance should also be on your radar. A recent survey in Manitoba found that in fields with uncontrolled wild oats, 100 per cent of populations were resistant to Group 1 products, 82 per cent were resistant to Group 2 products, and 82 per cent were resistant to both Group 1 and 2 herbicides. Those numbers show how important it is to take a closer look at wild oat weed escapes. Identifying why your herbicide failed to control wild oats is the first step toward finding a solution. Start by scouting the field to narrow down the cause. Consider factors such as application timing, weather conditions, late flush

Is fungicide actually effective on Sclerotinia head rot in sunflower?

This is one of the most difficult questions to answer because there are many things to consider. I also don’t want to be outright negative because we do still have options for sclerotinia management in sunflowers. However, management is the operative word. First of all, sclerotinia head rot infections have an interesting pathway. Spores use dead sunflower florets, plus pollen, as the base to infect a sunflower plant. The spores grow into the receptacle, infecting and decaying the entire head after a period of time. Sclerotinia wilt (basal stalk rot) and mid-stalk rot are also infected by the same sclerotinia species, but it will be via the mycelia that grow from the sclerotia bodies in the soil for basal stalk rot. Mid-stalk rot is also infected by ascospores, but this can be earlier in the season than head rot or at the same time. So, management of sclerotinia does not start at flowering. Crop rotation is the most obvious management tool that we are familiar with in sunflowers, but

Using Water More Efficiently in Beef Packing Plants

Packing plants use a time-tested approach to clean their facilities. The first step uses high-pressure hot water to remove fat and meat scraps from equipment, floors and walls. Next, surfaces are cleaned using detergent. Finally, sanitizers are used to further reduce bacterial numbers. Processing companies want to reduce water use as part of their environmental goals and to reduce energy bills. High-pressure water and steam can produce aerosols that capture bacteria and spread them throughout the plant. They can then settle on and cross-contaminate clean surfaces long after the cleaning has been completed, which complicates efforts to effectively clean facilities. Biofilms are another problem. Biofilms are colonies of bacteria surrounded by a protective layer that firmly attaches them to surfaces and shelters the bacteria from hot water, detergents and sanitizers. Biofilms are hard to remove and are commonly found in hard-to-reach places. These researchers investigated potential cro

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service