Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

Do you agree with the OFA that no more wind turbines should be built until a number of issues are dealt with?

The OFA has made a call to the Ontario government to suspend industrial wind turbines saying there are too many unanswered questions about its value, and that the debate over turbines is polarizing rural communities.

Read the OFA article - click here.

What are your thoughts? Do you agree that no more wind turbines should be built until a number of issues are dealt with?

Take the POLL: Do you think Ontario should halt wind turbines? - click here

Views: 1967

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by OntAG Admin on January 20, 2012 at 8:12am
formosafarmer profile

formosafarmer Had a great talk with a farm family that is Pro Wind Turbines. Good perspective. Only thing they are against is people stopping their choice

Permalink Reply by OntAG Admin on January 20, 2012 at 8:48am
Permalink Reply by OntAG Admin on January 20, 2012 at 10:03am
modernfarmer profile

modernfarmer Ontario farm group calls for halt to wind power developmenttgam.ca/DQyw via @globeandmail iPhone app

Permalink Reply by Joann on January 21, 2012 at 4:12am

I don't believe this is anything more than political posturing.

Our Premier has, in my personal opinion, shown nothing short of contempt towards farmers for the past 9 years.

Ontario is preparing for a budget.  The OFA dealt the first hand.


It will be interesting to see how the government play their cards.

Permalink Reply by OntAG Admin on January 21, 2012 at 5:21am
AlKerslake Al Kerslake
@OntAg wind turbines are only effective in selected areas
Permalink Reply by OntAG Admin on January 21, 2012 at 5:27am

NewHamburgIndy

NewHamburgIndy
Ontario Federation of Agriculture supports moratorium on . What will it mean for projects like this?
Permalink Reply by OntAG Admin on January 21, 2012 at 5:30am

On the OFA website article re OFA stance on wind turbines by Mark Wales, President, Ontario Federation of Agriculture:

Wind power versus rural power (2012)

 

The Ontario Federation of Agriculture (OFA) is calling on the provincial government to suspend the invasion of rural Ontario with industrial wind turbines.

 

Earlier this week OFA took a hard look at our own concerns with wind turbines. We have always been concerned with the price paid for wind power and the fact that it is not dispatchable – it is not stored for use during peak demand periods, making it highly inefficient. This was noted by Ontario’s Auditor General in his recent Annual Report in December 2011.    

 

In addition, our technical concerns with regard to setback issues, induced current and noise impacts remain unaddressed.   

 

OFA believes that the amendments to the Planning Act made under the authority of the Green Energy Act are not having the desired effect of providing for good planning. Removal of municipal input into industrial wind turbine projects has alienated the rural population and ignored competing community needs and policies.

All of these issues have been emphasized clearly by our members. Over the past few weeks we have clearly heard OFA members tell us of health concerns, concerns over the loss of farmland, encumbrances on their farm properties and many more issues related to the imposition of wind turbines across our rural landscape.

Most disconcerting of all is the impact wind turbines are having on the relationships across rural communities. When wind developments come to a community neighbours are pitted against neighbours. The issue of industrial wind turbine development is preoccupying the rural agenda.

OFA is telling the Ontario government our members have had enough. Rural Ontario cannot continue to be torn apart by wind turbines. The province needs to immediately suspend any further developments until our farm families and rural residents can be assured their interests are protected.

On behalf of rural Ontario, OFA needs to see the government enable community involvement in wind developments to ensure local planning issues and priorities are addressed. We need wind power to be priced right and made dispatchable so it can be used when we need it, rather than selling it at a loss during the nighttime. We need health and nuisance concerns addressed immediately and we need serious studies done on reasonable setback distances for the newer and larger turbines being planned.

The onus is on our provincial government to ensure the interests of rural Ontarians are protected. Our members are clearly telling us now that they are not. There are very serious concerns with wind energy as it is currently rolling out.

OFA supports green energy – Ontario needs a reliable, affordable source of renewable energy for our future. But we all need to work to ensure that green energy projects will respect concerns for noise, community involvement and price, balanced against the effective provision of that power.

Permalink Reply by OntAG Admin on January 21, 2012 at 4:47pm


apasztor829:31pm via Twitter for BlackBerry®

@OntAg would like to say we have a turbine on r farm and have no problems with it at all, my health is great, #OFA give your head a shake

Permalink Reply by Colette McLean on January 23, 2012 at 6:30am

Yes,  I agree!  no more turbines and thank OFA for putting forward a fairly clear proposal on what should be done to address the very real problems surrounding Industrial wind turbines and wind energy development.  Wind is unreliable, intermittent, inefficient, non-dispatchable, & expensive.  It has never been proven to reduce the burning or mining of coal, reduce emissions from fossil fuel plants, provide long term green jobs that does not atrophy jobs in other sectors.  It will at best provide 5% of Ontario energy needs & requires fossil fuel backup to compensate for it's intermittency.  The cost benefit analysis has not been done,  read the AG's report.   http://www.auditor.on.ca/en/reports_en/en11/303en11.pdf

Permalink Reply by Colette McLean on January 23, 2012 at 6:32am

Not everyone's health is affected & stating that you r not affected suggest others r lying.  Why would these people lie? Maybe ur lying because u make money!

OntAG Admin said:


apasztor829:31pm via Twitter for BlackBerry®

@OntAg would like to say we have a turbine on r farm and have no problems with it at all, my health is great, #OFA give your head a shake

Permalink Reply by Colette McLean on January 23, 2012 at 6:51am

"Most disconcerting of all is the impact wind turbines are having on the relationships across rural communities" As a farmer who was presented with the chance to have a turbine but found some very worrisome issues with the contracts, (first-rights of refusal, postponement of mortgages etc)  I can attest to how relationships have been shattered because I took a different stance.  Our neighbour wanted the turbines & because of the disagreement over the wind issue resulted in him pulling away from our custom combine services.

Permalink Reply by Colette McLean on January 23, 2012 at 6:57am

So what is their perspective.  This is not just about the property right of the landowners who want turbines,  it is also the land rights of those next to the turbines.  Because of required setbacks,  landowners with no turbines are limited with the future development (eg. barns, outbuildings, even their own energy projects)



OntAG Admin said:

formosafarmer profile

formosafarmer Had a great talk with a farm family that is Pro Wind Turbines. Good perspective. Only thing they are against is people stopping their choice

▶ Reply to Discussion

RSS

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Central Region Crops Set to Smash 5-Year Yields — If Weather Holds

Harvest is now officially underway across Alberta, with pulse crops and fall cereals leading the charge, according to the new provincial crop report. As of this first report of the season, roughly 2% of the provincial crop is in the bin, in line with the 5- and 10-year averages. The South Region is out in front at 6% complete, followed by the Peace at 2%, while most other regions remain

Key Saskatchewan Ag Route to See Major Upgrades

Grain Millers Drive, a key transportation corridor for Saskatchewan’s agricultural sector, is set for major upgrades with the provincial government pledging to cover up to half the project’s cost, it was announced Wednesday. The road, located north of Yorkton, supports some of the province’s largest agri-business operations and is considered essential for moving goods to both national and international markets. "Grain Millers Drive is a critical access point for several major agri-businesses and industries," Premier Scott Moe said in a release. "This is a key artery for the movement of goods and services, connecting local producers to national and international markets." The seven-kilometre primary weight road is home to major agricultural processors, including Grain Millers Oat Mill and Richardson Oilseed, North America’s largest canola crush facility. The Louis Dreyfus Company also operates a nearby canola facility and plans to add a new pea protein production plant along Grain

From Field to Feed: Six Things to Think About When Storing Hay

As swathers, haybines and balers hit the fields, storing forages is on the minds of many beef cattle producers. Proper hay storage is essential to preserve these resources produced in the summer months and provide high-quality winter feed for livestock when grazing is not feasible or accessible.   Preparation done ahead of time can help to avoid quality and quantity loses when harvested forages are exposed to the weather. A six-foot diameter round bale stored uncovered can be expected to have spoilage in a four-inch layer around the outside of the bale, which represents 20% of the bale volume.  Given that feed is the major input cost in cattle production, producers must evaluate the cost of production for all stored hay systems to determine the one that best fits their operation and goals.   Six considerations to enhance stored hay quality: 1. Minimize storage losses due to heating and mould growth by baling at moisture levels between 15% and 18%.  2. Increased bale density enhanc

Tax credit for Saputo an udder success

Alberta boasts one of Canada’s strongest agricultural sectors and dairy production is a significant contributor. In 2024, Alberta produced 848 million litres of milk, making it the country’s third-largest producer. That same year, the industry employed 2,400 people. Alberta’s government introduced the Agri-Processing Investment Tax Credit (APITC) in 2023 to encourage investment in the value-added agri-processing manufacturing sector. Saputo has qualified for conditional approval of the tax credit by investing more than $38 million in capital equipment at its Edmonton facility, substantially increasing its production capacity. The expansion will also improve food safety, enhance workforce health and safety, and modernize machines for greater reliability. “We continue to attract diverse investment in Alberta’s agri-food industry by creating the ideal conditions for businesses to grow and establish operations in Alberta. The Saputo partnership’s conditional approval is a milestone for t

Fertilizer Canada Appoints Casper Kaastra of Sollio Agriculture as Chair of the Board of Directors

Fertilizer Canada appoints Casper Kaastra, CEO of Sollio Agriculture, as the new Chair of the association’s Board of Directors. Kaastra has served on the board for over five years, including the last two as Vice-Chair. He brings strong leadership and extensive experience in agriculture, fertilizer distribution, specialty products, and agri-retail.

© 2025   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service