Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

Nano-Technology: Manipulating Nature for Agricultural and other Profits

Lastnight I was on greenhousecanada.com, which led me to an article posted by the Toronto Star, about an new Genetically Modified apple, which will not brown when it is sliced. The apple was actually developed by a Canadian biotech company, and is awaiting approval from the U,S, Heres the link :http://www.thestar.com/living/article/898834--gm-apple-won-t-go-bro...

 

 I am, and for good reason, very skeptical about the long-term affects of GMOs, which bring me to my next point, which I think we as consumers and agriculturalists need to be informed about---Nano-technology (N.T)

 

If you don't know what this means, youre not the only one. Some people say it is the way of the future, I say it is the way of sure devastation. It seems very little people are aware of what N.T is, how it is being used for every day products in our lives, and how it will affect us in the long-term. 

 

The National Nano-technology Initiative technically defines N.T as :

1. Research and tehcnology development at the atomic level

2. Creating and using structures that have novel properties and functions because of their size

3. The ability to manipulate and control on the atomic scale

 

So, this is not just a small effort to boost profits, but it is a nature-altering action with unpredictable outcomes. Although most people can't define N.T, it is currently being used for MANY things, from;

bandages, condoms, cosmetics, sunscreen, toothbrushes,paints, cell phones, the IPOD nano, even vitamins and teddy bears!

 

There has been a huge push for nano-technology by the health and agricultural industries (can someone say profits?) and it was expected that by this year (2010)the N.T. food market has reached 20.4 billion and 5/10 of the largest food and beverage companies will have invested in this technology R&D. Yes-this means Heinz, Kraft, General Mills.

 

-What does this mean to farmers?

-What if we disagree with the use of NT? What can we do about it?

 

If you would like to read more about N.T., I have attached a power point presentation that was given to me at the Organic Conference at U of Guelph in 2008. The presentation was made by Dag Flack, the Organic Program Manager at Natures Food Path Inc. and I found it very helpful in explaining NT.

In this slideshow you will find extensive information about how N.T. works, and effects humans, and the planet, how it threatens organic crops and explains the Soil Association Nano Standard. I hope you enjoy this and I hope it sparks more discussion among the agricultural community.

 

We need to be more knowledgable about what R&D is being done, and how we can band together to show our disagreeance of the un-natural formation of these products.

 

 

Jamie

 

 

Views: 87

Attachments:

Reply to This

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Federal leaders promising to protect supply management

Liberal, Conservative and Bloc leaders are committed to preserving supply management

Canada invests $567M in African swine fever prevention, preparedness

The Government of Canada is committed to protecting the resilience of Canada's rural communities and the Canadian pork sector by supporting prevention efforts and preparing to respond in the event of an African swine fever outbreak. Last week Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Lawrence MacAulay announced a commitment of up to $567.16 million to support hog producers should there be a closure of key export markets for Canadian pork products and live pigs due to an ASF outbreak in Canada or the United States. While Canada remains free of ASF, a single detection of ASF in Canada would close export markets due to international trade regulations and import restrictions imposed by trading partners. Canada is heavily dependent on pork and live pig exports, and the closure of key export markets would be devastating to the pork sector. It would cause hog producers to incur extraordinary costs and force them to make difficult decisions about depopulating their herds. "Thanks to the hard wor

Using Models to Enhance Sow Productivity

Modern swine production demands precision in feeding high-prolific sows to ensure both longevity and optimal performance. Over the past decade, advances in sow genetics and feeding systems have reinforced the need for accurate nutritional programs that prevent overfeeding or underfeeding individual sows. Advanced sow nutritional and management models offer swine nutritionists reliable, data-driven insights to support long-term productivity. When provided with accurate information on sow genotype, productivity, feed programs, and barn environmental data, these models have proven effective in helping producers refine feeding strategies, optimize production, and reduce feed costs. Even minor improvements in feeding precision can result in substantial economic benefits. The role of models in sow nutrition Advanced analysis and predictive modelling capabilities can assist swine nutritionists in designing sow feeding programs by integrating complex data on genetics, production history, and

NPPC asks Canada to exclude U.S. pork from retaliatory tariffs

The National Pork Producers Council has urged the Canadian government to exempt pork from any retaliatory tariffs levied on U.S. products in response to President Trump’s duties on imports from Canada. The United States exported more than $850 million of pork to Canada in 2024, while the country sent $1.7 billion of pork to the United States. Additionally, Canada exported more than $560 million worth of live swine to the United States last year, primarily to U.S. finishing and slaughter facilities where they were comingled with U.S. swine, and much of the pork was later exported back to Canada. Trump has pledged to impose the tariffs on Canada – and China and Mexico – as a way to reduce the flow of illegal immigration and fentanyl into the United States, as well as to address an $80 billion trade deficit with Canada. In written comments to Canada’s Department of Finance, NPPC noted that “[T]he tit-for-tat tariff exchanges will disrupt supply chains that have been built up over decad

NPPC requests pork be exempt from Canada’s retaliatory tariffs

Years of work poured into building an integrated US-Canada pork market may come falling down as the Canadian government seeks to enact retaliatory tariffs on US products after the Trump administration imposed 25% tariffs on imports from Canada. In hopes of retaining the countries’ strong trade relationship, the National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) wrote to the Canadian government asking that pork products be exempt from any retaliatory tariffs levied on US products. “The tit-for-tat tariff exchanges will disrupt supply chains that have been built up over decades,” the group wrote to Canada’s International Trade Policy Division on March 21. “We request that Canada seeks to preserve the benefits of the integrated North American market to the maximum extent practicable, including by excluding US pork imports from retaliation.” In 2024, the United States exported more than $850 million worth of pork to Canada, while Canada shipped $1.7 billion lbs of pork to the United States. Canada a

© 2025   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service