Supreme Court of Canada Decision on Ontario v. Fraser - Ban on Farm Unions Constitutional

The Supreme Court ruling handed down this morning in the case of Fraser v. Ontario is a great victory for the Attorney General and the farming community.

LICC through its partnership with the Ontario Federation of Agriculture is delighted with the ruling. The ruling endorses that the Agricultural Employees Protection Act is constitutional. The Supreme Court totally rejected the Ontario Appeals Court ruling which was a concern to us. The Agricultural Employees Protection Act is the vehicle for workers collective interest. The ruling protects workers rights. Farm Employers are committed to working within the Agricultural Employees Protection Act

Here is a Bulletin and Backgrounder from LICC legal counsel Heenan Blaikie

April 29, 2011

Ontario v. Fraser – Supreme Court of Canada Allows the Appeal

This morning, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser (“Fraser”) concerning the extent of the constitutional protection of collective bargaining for Ontario agricultural workers under section 2(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (“Charter”).

The Supreme Court determined that the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Fraser v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2008 ONCA 760 should be overturned on the basis that the Court of Appeal seriously overstated the scope of collective bargaining rights under section 2(d). As a result, the appeal brought by the Attorney General of Ontario, in which the Ontario Federation of Agriculture and numerous other organizations intervened, has been allowed and the Agricultural Employees Protection Act, 2002 (“AEPA”) has been found to satisfy constitutional requirements.

Fraser is clearly one of the most significant labour and constitutional decisions in Canadian history.

Backgrounder: The Ontario Court of Appeal’s Decision in Fraser v. Ontario

In its 2008 decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal determined that the exclusion of agricultural workers from Ontario’s Labour Relations Act (“LRA”) and their inclusion in a separate statutory regime, the AEPA, was unconstitutional because it failed to provide adequate statutory protections to allow these workers to engage in collective bargaining. The Court of Appeal found that while the AEPA allowed workers to form or join employee associations (including unions) and to make representations to their employers regarding their employment, unlike the LRA, it did not compel employers to respond to and bargain with employees, did not regulate labour disputes, and did not limit representation rights to a single association or union per group of employees.

The Ontario Court of Appeal identified four protections that the Legislature was required to enact to enable agricultural workers to exercise their right to bargain collectively:

A duty to bargain in good faith;
A requirement that employee representatives be selected based on the principles of majoritarianism and exclusivity;
A mechanism for resolving labour disputes (i.e., strikes and lockouts);
A mechanism for resolving disputes regarding the interpretation and administration of collective agreements.

While the Court of Appeal was not entirely clear in this regard, it appeared to suggest that the constitutional right of collective bargaining in section 2(d) of the Charter generally requires statutory protection of the above-noted features.

At the time the Court of Appeal’s decision was released, many observers commented that it may be in conflict with the Supreme Court of Canada’s 2007 finding in the B.C. Health Services case that the constitutional protection for collective bargaining does not guarantee a particular model of labour relations.

The Supreme Court of Canada heard the appeal in Fraser v. Ontario in December 2009 and the matter has been under reserve since that time.

The Labour & Employment in the News E-News Bulletin is published by Heenan Blaikie LLP. The articles and comments contained herewith provide general information only. They should not be regarded or relied upon as legal advice or opinions. Heenan Blaikie LLP would be pleased to provide more information on matters of interest to our readers. © 2011, Heenan Blaikie LLP.

The ruling is over 200 pages and can be found at http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc20/2011scc20.pdf

If you have questions on any of this material please contact,

Ken Linington P.Ag.

Labour Issues Coordinating Committee/Flowers Canada (Ontario)

45 Speedvale Avenue East, Unit 7

Guelph, Ontario

N1H 1J2

519 836-5495 or 1 800 698-0113 ext. 227

519 836-7529 fax

Ken@fco.on.ca

Lori Moser

OPIC/OSHAB Managing Director

Phone:519-684-6805

Cell:519-577-OPIC

lori.moser@rogers.com

www.opic.on.ca

▶ Reply to This

Welcome to
Ontario Agriculture

Sign Up
or Sign In

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Guinness World Record attempt to take place in St. Albert on Aug. 22

?ST. ALBERT – If you have ever wanted to witness an attempt at a Guinness World Record, then you will want to be in St. Albert, Ontario on August 22 when an attempt will be made to set a record for the most plow blades pulled simultaneously.

Why Alignment Matters: Domestic Check-Off and the Import Levy

When Canadian beef producers sell cattle, they contribute to the national beef check-off. That investment supports work that benefits the broader Canadian beef industry, including market development, consumer demand, public and stakeholder engagement, and research. When beef or beef cattle are imported into Canada, an import levy is also collected. While the structure is not identical in every detail, the principle behind it is straightforward: beef marketed in Canada should help contribute to the programs that support beef demand in Canada. The national check-off paid by producers and the import levy paid on eligible imports are two parts of a broader investment approach. Together, they help ensure that both domestic beef production and imported beef products are connected to the market development work that strengthens beef’s position with Canadian consumers. For producers, the domestic cattle check-off is collected at the point of sale and includes both national and provincial po

I’ve noticed a lot of wild oat escapes in some of my fields this year; what can I do to prevent it from getting worse next year?

Despite our best efforts, sometimes even the best laid weed control plans go wrong! The first thing to remember is that not all weed escapes are created equal. In some cases, weeds can survive because of application timing issues, challenging weather conditions or late flushes that emerge after spraying. However, when weeds aren’t controlled by herbicide applications, herbicide resistance should also be on your radar. A recent survey in Manitoba found that in fields with uncontrolled wild oats, 100 per cent of populations were resistant to Group 1 products, 82 per cent were resistant to Group 2 products, and 82 per cent were resistant to both Group 1 and 2 herbicides. Those numbers show how important it is to take a closer look at wild oat weed escapes. Identifying why your herbicide failed to control wild oats is the first step toward finding a solution. Start by scouting the field to narrow down the cause. Consider factors such as application timing, weather conditions, late flush

Is fungicide actually effective on Sclerotinia head rot in sunflower?

This is one of the most difficult questions to answer because there are many things to consider. I also don’t want to be outright negative because we do still have options for sclerotinia management in sunflowers. However, management is the operative word. First of all, sclerotinia head rot infections have an interesting pathway. Spores use dead sunflower florets, plus pollen, as the base to infect a sunflower plant. The spores grow into the receptacle, infecting and decaying the entire head after a period of time. Sclerotinia wilt (basal stalk rot) and mid-stalk rot are also infected by the same sclerotinia species, but it will be via the mycelia that grow from the sclerotia bodies in the soil for basal stalk rot. Mid-stalk rot is also infected by ascospores, but this can be earlier in the season than head rot or at the same time. So, management of sclerotinia does not start at flowering. Crop rotation is the most obvious management tool that we are familiar with in sunflowers, but

Using Water More Efficiently in Beef Packing Plants

Packing plants use a time-tested approach to clean their facilities. The first step uses high-pressure hot water to remove fat and meat scraps from equipment, floors and walls. Next, surfaces are cleaned using detergent. Finally, sanitizers are used to further reduce bacterial numbers. Processing companies want to reduce water use as part of their environmental goals and to reduce energy bills. High-pressure water and steam can produce aerosols that capture bacteria and spread them throughout the plant. They can then settle on and cross-contaminate clean surfaces long after the cleaning has been completed, which complicates efforts to effectively clean facilities. Biofilms are another problem. Biofilms are colonies of bacteria surrounded by a protective layer that firmly attaches them to surfaces and shelters the bacteria from hot water, detergents and sanitizers. Biofilms are hard to remove and are commonly found in hard-to-reach places. These researchers investigated potential cro

More…

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service