Supreme Court of Canada Decision on Ontario v. Fraser - Ban on Farm Unions Constitutional

The Supreme Court ruling handed down this morning in the case of Fraser v. Ontario is a great victory for the Attorney General and the farming community.

LICC through its partnership with the Ontario Federation of Agriculture is delighted with the ruling. The ruling endorses that the Agricultural Employees Protection Act is constitutional. The Supreme Court totally rejected the Ontario Appeals Court ruling which was a concern to us. The Agricultural Employees Protection Act is the vehicle for workers collective interest. The ruling protects workers rights. Farm Employers are committed to working within the Agricultural Employees Protection Act

Here is a Bulletin and Backgrounder from LICC legal counsel Heenan Blaikie

April 29, 2011

Ontario v. Fraser – Supreme Court of Canada Allows the Appeal

This morning, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser (“Fraser”) concerning the extent of the constitutional protection of collective bargaining for Ontario agricultural workers under section 2(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (“Charter”).

The Supreme Court determined that the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Fraser v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2008 ONCA 760 should be overturned on the basis that the Court of Appeal seriously overstated the scope of collective bargaining rights under section 2(d). As a result, the appeal brought by the Attorney General of Ontario, in which the Ontario Federation of Agriculture and numerous other organizations intervened, has been allowed and the Agricultural Employees Protection Act, 2002 (“AEPA”) has been found to satisfy constitutional requirements.

Fraser is clearly one of the most significant labour and constitutional decisions in Canadian history.

Backgrounder: The Ontario Court of Appeal’s Decision in Fraser v. Ontario

In its 2008 decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal determined that the exclusion of agricultural workers from Ontario’s Labour Relations Act (“LRA”) and their inclusion in a separate statutory regime, the AEPA, was unconstitutional because it failed to provide adequate statutory protections to allow these workers to engage in collective bargaining. The Court of Appeal found that while the AEPA allowed workers to form or join employee associations (including unions) and to make representations to their employers regarding their employment, unlike the LRA, it did not compel employers to respond to and bargain with employees, did not regulate labour disputes, and did not limit representation rights to a single association or union per group of employees.

The Ontario Court of Appeal identified four protections that the Legislature was required to enact to enable agricultural workers to exercise their right to bargain collectively:

A duty to bargain in good faith;
A requirement that employee representatives be selected based on the principles of majoritarianism and exclusivity;
A mechanism for resolving labour disputes (i.e., strikes and lockouts);
A mechanism for resolving disputes regarding the interpretation and administration of collective agreements.

While the Court of Appeal was not entirely clear in this regard, it appeared to suggest that the constitutional right of collective bargaining in section 2(d) of the Charter generally requires statutory protection of the above-noted features.

At the time the Court of Appeal’s decision was released, many observers commented that it may be in conflict with the Supreme Court of Canada’s 2007 finding in the B.C. Health Services case that the constitutional protection for collective bargaining does not guarantee a particular model of labour relations.

The Supreme Court of Canada heard the appeal in Fraser v. Ontario in December 2009 and the matter has been under reserve since that time.

The Labour & Employment in the News E-News Bulletin is published by Heenan Blaikie LLP. The articles and comments contained herewith provide general information only. They should not be regarded or relied upon as legal advice or opinions. Heenan Blaikie LLP would be pleased to provide more information on matters of interest to our readers. © 2011, Heenan Blaikie LLP.

The ruling is over 200 pages and can be found at http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc20/2011scc20.pdf

If you have questions on any of this material please contact,

Ken Linington P.Ag.

Labour Issues Coordinating Committee/Flowers Canada (Ontario)

45 Speedvale Avenue East, Unit 7

Guelph, Ontario

N1H 1J2

519 836-5495 or 1 800 698-0113 ext. 227

519 836-7529 fax

Ken@fco.on.ca

Lori Moser

OPIC/OSHAB Managing Director

Phone:519-684-6805

Cell:519-577-OPIC

lori.moser@rogers.com

www.opic.on.ca

▶ Reply to This

Welcome to
Ontario Agriculture

Sign Up
or Sign In

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Soybean Fungicide Decisions

As soybean crops move into flowering, questions are sure to be raised about whether fungicide applications are needed. In anticipation, let’s take a closer look at the potential disease threats and what Manitoba On-Farm Network research has told us. What Should We Be Concerned About? Foliar diseases infecting soybeans in Manitoba typically occur at low severity levels and are not expected to impact yield most years. These usually include bacterial blight, downy mildew and Septoria brown spot. Stem diseases generally have a greater impact on yield. White mould: infections begin at nodes along the main stem. Wilted plants may be spotted from afar, within a humid canopy may find white mycelial growth and black sclerotia bodies later in the season. This disease is the main target of fungicide applications. Cool, wet conditions throughout July and August favour white mould. For every 10% increase in the percent of plants infected with white mould, 2-5 bu/ac of yield are lost in soybeans.

Fungicide Decision Tool for Managing Mycosphaerella Blight in Field Peas

When your peas have reached V10 (10th node stage), it is an ideal time to start scouting each field to evaluate if a fungicide application to manage Mycosphaerella blight is warranted. Continue scouting for symptoms from V10 (10th true node) to R2 (beginning bloom), during mid-June to late July. Mycosphaerella (Ascochyta) blight is the most widespread and economically damaging foliar disease of Manitoba field peas. Peas are the single host crop of Mycosphaerella but it can be managed by foliar fungicide. This pathogen can be stubble-, air-, soil- and seed-borne. Spores can travel long distances by air, meaning there is a disease risk even in fields where peas have not been grown previously. The impact of disease severity on yield will depend on how early the disease sets in and how quickly it progresses into the upper crop canopy. Early infections during the bloom to early/mid-pod stages cause the most damage if left untreated. Use this fungicide decision worksheet when scouting to

Manitoba pork, canola producers hold steady amid heavy tariffs

A slab of back bacon from Natural Raised Pork comes with a waitlist. Ian Smith points to tariffs. Since the United States placed levies on imports from Canada, Manitobans have increasingly been calling Smith about his farm near Argyle, some 40 kilometres northwest of Winnipeg. “There’s more people wanting to support local and I’m one of few people that do what I’m doing,” said Smith, 62. He estimates 90 per cent of his pork products are bought by Manitoba households; the latter goes to a packing plant. Last year, it was a 50-50 split. Smith works alone, hustling to meet the four-to-six week waitlist that’s accumulated. He keeps hundreds of feeder pigs and a couple dozen sows; it’s a relatively small operation, he noted. “If there’s any mistakes to be made, there’s only one person to blame and that’s me,” he said with a laugh. Smith doesn’t export to China — so he’s shielded from that nation’s levies still hanging over the Canadian industry.

KAP Welcomes Appointment of New U.S. Trade Representative

Keystone Agricultural Producers (KAP) welcomes the appointment of Richard Madan as Manitoba’s new trade representative to the United States. “We commend Premier Kinew and Minister Moses for making Manitoba’s voice a priority in Washington, D.C.,” said KAP President Jill Verwey. “We look forward to working with Mr. Madan to advance the interests of Manitoba farmers and the agricultural industry, ensuring these interests are at the forefront of his work as he forges stronger relationships with American policymakers and trade officials.” Agriculture is an important part of Manitoba’s economy, with $4.29 billion in agri-food exports to the U.S. alone in 2024, and KAP sees the new presence in Washington as instrumental in fostering strategic relationships with key states that are important to our trade interests. “The U.S. is Manitoba’s largest agri-food export destination and is one of Manitoba’s key trading partners on the international stage,” added KAP General Manager Colin Hornby. “

2025 Annual General Meeting

On Wednesday, June 18th, the Ontario Farmland Trust hosted its Annual General Meeting. The meeting was held hybrid again this year, with members and friends joining both virtually and in person.

More…

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service