Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

http://www.lfpress.com/news/london/2010/02/16/12895161.html

before long they'll be asking for another 300m saying they can't afford to go on. tobacco is giving the rest of ag a bad name with their hands always out. time to let them find other crops on their own.

Ontario tobacco growers who took federal buyout money are exploiting loopholes to keep growing the crop, an anti-smoking lobby charges.

While virtually every Ontario producer took the buyout last year, the province still produced the same size crop in 2009 as it did in 2008 before the incentive to get out of the business kicked in.

If the program isn't getting growers out of the industry, it's "a colossal waste of money," says the federal Liberal health critic.

"Even if it follows the letter of the law, it's not the spirit," said Toronto MP Carolyn Bennett, a doctor. "I don't think the auditor-general would be happy with the way the government is spending this money."

Tobacco farmers were paid $286 million in compensation last year when the tobacco production quota system was scrapped and replaced with a new licensing system.

All but 18 growers took the buyout, averaging about $275,000, agreeing never to grow tobacco again.

But 118 growers were licensed last summer under the new system and an estimated 22-million-pound crop was produced, the same as in 2008.

Many people who hold the new tobacco licences struck deals with experienced growers who took the buyout, said Neil Collishaw of Ottawa-based Physicians for a Smoke-free Canada.

"Licences have been issued to non-farmers, sometimes living in distant communities, who provide legal cover to tobacco farmers who have been paid to stop growing tobacco, but are continuing to farm the same quantities on the same land," he said.

Collishaw said people have told him about tobacco farmers growing the crop for relatives or friends who are tobacco licence holders.

The Free Press was contacted by a former grower and a neighbour of a grower who confirmed Collishaw's claims about loopholes.

But Fred Neukamm, chairperson of the Ontario Flue-Cured Tobacco Grower Marketing Board, said the buyout program wasn't aimed at eliminating all tobacco production in Canada.

He said growers who took the buyout are legally allowed to work for a licence holder.

With a major investment in tobacco land and equipment, he said, many growers had no viable alternative crop.

"People are stuck with debt and stranded infrastructure with no viable transitional opportunities, so they are forced to seek employment," Neukamm said.

Last May, an Agriculture Canada deputy minister sent a letter to the tobacco board advising that farmers who took the buyout could work for a licence holder if the relationship was at "arm's length" and any payments for services were at "fair market value."

Agriculture Canada's Patrick Girard said the quota buyout program was put in place "to assist those farmers exiting the program to pursue new opportunities in agriculture."

He said any farmer who breaches the buyout program's conditions will have to repay the assistance they received, plus interest.

Last April, federal Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz moved to tighten up the buyout program by requiring licence holders to sign a declaration saying they're not receiving money from the quota buyout program.

Farmers who took the buyout couldn't be a partner or shareholder in a licensed tobacco operation.

But Collishaw said former growers still have the chance to get lucrative salaries from licensees to grow the crop.

The tobacco licensees were also eligible for a federal interest-free advance payout program offered to agricultural producers.

Neukamm said the tobacco board is working "rigorously" to prevent any abuse of the system, requiring full disclosure from licence holders who rent land or equipment from a farmer who took the buyout.

The tobacco marketing board, which once served the interests of thousands of tobacco growers, is now a small government-appointed agency that oversees and enforces tobacco licensing. Its employees have shrunk from 15 to two and its Tillsonburg headquarters has been sold.

Neukamm said Physicians for a Smoke-Free Canada appeared to be on a "witch hunt" for tobacco farmers and should devote more effort to urging the federal government to curb the growing market for untaxed contraband tobacco.

Collishaw said the number of tobacco licences granted in Ontario is likely to grow next year.

Neukamm said more licences are possible because the production of Ontario tobacco lags behind the demand by manufacturers serving the Canadian market.

Views: 359

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

what happened here will make it difficult for a good longterm planning for the futhure of all agriculture supported by our prov. and federal treasures.
any program will need a clause to protect the programs from legal abuse of the system.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Canadian Feedstocks Eligible Under 45Z Credit

Eligible feedstocks will include those grown in Canada under newly proposed rules for the U.S. clean fuel production credit, a development that could have significant implications for North American biofuel markets and Canadian oilseed producers. The U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service on Tuesday released proposed regulations outlining how domestic producers can qualify for and calculate the clean fuel production credit, commonly known as the 45Z credit. The guidance reflects changes made under last year’s One Big Beautiful Bill and is intended to provide greater clarity and certainty for fuel producers navigating the program. The clean fuel production credit applies to clean transportation fuels produced in the U.S. after Dec. 31, 2024, and sold by Dec. 31, 2029. To claim the credit, producers must be registered with the IRS and comply with detailed certification, emissions accounting, and reporting requirements set out in the proposal. Among the mos

Beef Industry Groups Warn on Research Cutbacks

Canada’s beef industry is warning federal research cuts could undermine competitiveness, food safety, and export growth for years to come. The Canadian Cattle Association (CCA) and the Beef Cattle Research Council (BCRC) said in a joint statement Tuesday that announced reductions at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and the planned closures of research facilities in Nappan, N.S., Quebec City, and Lacombe, Alta., will have far-reaching consequences for cattle producers, consumers, and Canada’s broader agri-food economy. While acknowledging federal fiscal pressures, the groups argue the loss of specialized public research capacity is shortsighted and difficult to reverse. The groups are urging AAFC to transfer key programs and researchers to other institutions if closures proceed, and to refund industry investments where projects are cancelled mid-stream. Over the past decade, beef producers have increased their own research funding by more than 600%, viewing innovation as essential

How the County of Newell Took Over CDC South and Protected Alberta’s Irrigated Research Hub

Once at risk of being lost, the Crop Diversification Centre South is being rebuilt through a county-led cost-recovery model, new leases, and growing interest from Alberta researchers. When the Government of Alberta exited direct agricultural research in 2019, few places felt the impact more sharply than the historic Crop Diversification Centre (CDC) South near Brooks. Long regarded as a cornerstone of irrigated crop and horticulture research, the facility suddenly found itself with only seven researchers to manage hundreds of acres, a complex of aging buildings — and no roadmap for the future. “We started getting complaints about weeds four feet tall,” recalls Candace Woods, project coordinator for the CDC South revitalization project. Woods had worked at the centre from 2015 until being laid off during the government transition. When she returned years later, she found a facility at real risk of being lost. “There wasn’t a long-term plan,” she says. “The County saw that if nobody

Empire shutters e-commerce facilities in Alberta

Empire Company Limited and its subsidiary Sobeys Inc have announced the immediate closure of its Alberta e-commerce facilities due to financial underperformance of its e-commerce network. The facilities comprise a customer fulfillment centre (CFC) in the Calgary area and a smaller support facility in Edmonton. In addition, the company is pausing development of a CFC in the Vancouver area. Empire will continue to support customers in Western Canada who prefer to shop online through its third-party partnerships. "We remain highly committed to grocery e-commerce in Canada and on continuing to make online shopping more convenient for our customers, while delivering immediate bottom-line improvements to our e-commerce business," said Pierre St-Laurent, president & CEO, Empire who assumed the role in November, 2025.  Empire will continue to serve customers in Ontario and Québec through its Voilà banner, supported by its existing CFCs in the Greater Toronto and Montreal areas. Those operat

Canadian farmers wanted for mental health survey

It will ask participants questions like how often they’ve felt sad, down or depressed in the last two weeks.

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service