Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

Canadian Federation of Agriculture's Reaction To The Federal Budget 2013.

CFA's Reaction to Budget 2013

Canadian Federation of Agriculture News Release

OTTAWA, March 21, 2013 - The Canadian Federation of Agriculture (CFA) welcomed several measures in the Federal Budget tabled today that will help to promote the growth of the agriculture industry, but have concerns around taxation barriers to young and small-scale farmers.

"Overall, we are pleased to see Budget 2013 outline several important contributions essential to the growth of the sector - reaffirmation of the $3 billion in funding for Growing Forward 2 programs and investments in research and innovation, in particular," said CFA President Ron Bonnett.

"However, CFA and its members have concerns around taxation barriers to new entrants in agriculture and small-scale farmers. As agriculture is the sector facing the largest number of impending retirees in the next ten years, we had hoped the measures would have gone further in addressing this," Bonnett remarked.

The Budget covers various areas that affect agriculture, including:

Taxation


- CFA was pleased to see the increase of $50,000 to the Lifetime Capital Gains Exemption - an important tool for helping farmers manage the tax burden associated with the transfer of farm assets. Although this is a minor increase, the resulting positive change is that it will be indexed with inflation, allowing the exemption to keep up with increasing real costs.


- A major barrier for attracting new entrants to agriculture is Section 31 - Restricted Farm Losses - of the Income Tax Act. This section of the Act outlines circumstances under which a farmer's ability to claim farm losses will be restricted to $8,750, when a farmer also has incoming off-farm income. The Budget tabled today indicated an increase to $17, 500. The inability to claim more than $8,750 of farming losses was an unmanageable barrier for new entrants facing high farmland values and farming's increasing capital costs. The increase outlined in the Budget will only slightly improve the situation. The CFA has recommended the restriction increase to a more realistic $40,000 for new entrants to agriculture.


The CFA is disappointed with the reinterpretation of this Section, requiring that off-farm income be a subordinate source to farm income. For the majority of new entrants to the industryand small-scale farmers, off-farm income represents a critical support in funding start-up costs, making farm expansions, and simply maintaining the viability of many of Canada's family farms. This reinterpretation may prevent these farmers from being able to claim more than $17,500 in losses, and may pose a challenge to entering or staying in the industry.

Research


- The Government is increasing its investment in Genome Canada, which will support agricultural innovation and research. CFA has been advocating the importance of investment in basic public research, so this is a well-received measure with industry. Considering the domestic and global challenges with climate change and doubling food production for an increasing population, basic research into plant breeds is a priority, and CFA is pleased to see this recognized and supported by the Government.

Infrastructure

- The Government is contributing significant funding to infrastructure, which, once implemented, will see significant benefits to rural communities. This should result in positive benefits for farmers through much needed maintenance, repair, and upgrading of Canada's rural infrastructure, specifically linked to transportation and accessibility to markets.


Trade


- CFA is pleased to see continued support for Beyond the Border and work under the Regulatory Cooperation Council, reducing barriers to trade between Canada and the US through harmonization.


- CFA also welcomes this Government's continued focus on a globally competitive business environment.


Clean Energy


- The Budget provides tax incentives for clean energy generation equipment and a significant allocation of funds to Sustainable Development Technology Canada for the development and implementation of new, clean technologies. CFA is pleased to see the continued support for clean energy technologies, and hopes it is structured in a way that allows Canada's farmers to take advantage of the benefits in a timely fashion.


"We firmly believe retaining agriculture as a viable business must be priority if we want to maintain a Canadian food supply. We look forward to working with this Government to maximize the potential of the sector and to flesh out the positive steps this Budget has taken for research and innovation," concluded Bonnett.

The Canadian Federation of Agriculture is the country's largest farmers' organization, representing provincial general farm organizations as well as national and interprovincial commodity organizations from every province - over 200,000 Canadian farmers and farm families.

Views: 171

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

2025-2026 Year in Review Showcases Impacts of Beef Producer Investments

What have your investments in the Canadian Beef Cattle Check-Off accomplished for the industry lately? The Beef Cattle Research Council’s 2025–2026 Year in Review highlights how producer investments and input are advancing research, addressing industry priorities and delivering practical value back to Canada’s beef producers. “The BCRC continues to enhance coordination across the broader beef system, bringing researchers and industry groups together so we can make the best use of limited resources and move solutions and benefits to producers more quickly,” said BCRC Executive Director Tracy Herbert. “The BCRC’s collaborative approach is essential as we address complex challenges and position the Canadian beef industry for long-term success.”   The 2025-2026 BCRC Year in Review provides a broad funding overview by program area and source. In the past fiscal year, the BCRC received on average $0.66 (unaudited) of every $2.50 of the Canadian Beef Cattle Check-Off collected by provincial

Pre-harvest products and how to use them

Canola growers have three primary reasons for a pre-harvest spray application: Weed control ???????Desiccation Manage uneven crop ??????????????Use scenarios for pre-harvest spray Weed control Pre-harvest can be a good time to manage weeds, especially when straight combining. The act of swathing and curing can also provide weed control. Effective control is challenging on big weeds: apply product at the recommended rate with high water volumes to penetrate the crop canopy and achieve thorough coverage. Note: Set reasonable expectations on preventing seed set. Charles Geddes, weed management scientist with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada in Lethbridge, Alberta, says: “There is no easy way to tell if weeds will have mature seed, but in my experience, it happens earlier than one might think. I suggest that the latest a weed should be left is until it is flowering. Once it starts to flower, then some of the seed can mature on the plant after it is terminated. From a weed management p

Pre-harvest glyphosate staging tips help produce market-ready crops

As harvest approaches, Keep it Clean is reminding Canadian canola, cereal and pulse growers to follow proper staging practices for pre-harvest glyphosate application to help protect crop marketability and preserve access to domestic and export markets. Applying pre-harvest glyphosate for weed control too early can result in unacceptable product residues in harvested grain. Keep it Clean’s Pre-Harvest Glyphosate Staging Guide provides visual examples to help growers identify when grain moisture content in canola, cereals and pulses is less than 30 per cent – the only stage at which pre-harvest glyphosate may be applied. Where allowed, glyphosate is registered for pre-harvest weed control and is not to be used as a desiccant. Pre-harvest glyphosate may only be applied when grain moisture content is less than 30 per cent in the least mature part of the field, including any areas of regrowth that may produce seed. “Glyphosate is an important tool in the grower’s toolbox for crop manage

Safeguarding Cereals Against Allergens

Maintaining a reputation for clean, safe grain is essential for both domestic and international markets. Shipments contaminated with allergenic grains can lead to costly rejections, recalls and long-term damage to market confidence. Unintentional mingling of allergenic grains with cereals is a concern for export markets and must be actively managed.  Certain crop types can be allergen sources in our export markets. When these crops are unintentionally mixed with cereals, they can pose serious food safety and market access risks.   Common allergen sources in grain exports include:  Mustard   Soy   Buckwheat   Buckwheat is considered highly allergenic, and even very small amounts mixed into wheat, barley or oats can cause severe reactions in some markets. Because of these risks, many export markets apply strict limits for allergenic material in cereal shipments.  How allergens can contaminate grain  Allergen contamination most often occurs through shared equipment and handling system

Canada Launches First Private Forest Owner Survey in Over 20 Years, Farmers Invited to Participate

Canadian farmers who own woodlots or private forests are being asked to participate in the first national survey of private forest owners in more than 20 years.

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service