Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

Gibberella Ear Rot

 

  • The most common and important ear mould in Ontario is Gibberella zeae which is the sexual reproductive stage of Fusarium graminearium
  • Infection often begins at the ear tip and moves down towards the ear base.
  • Although the fungus can produce a white-coloured mould which makes it difficult to tell apart from Fusarium Kernel Rot, the two can be distinguished easily when Gibberella produces its characteristic red or pink colour mould.
  • Toxins produced by Gibberella include Deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin or DON), Zearalenone (ZEN) and T-2 toxin. If grain is to be used for feed, a myctoxin test is recommended.
  • Reducing toxin levels by combine adjustment and grain cleaning is difficult

 

Image of Gibberella Ear Rot

Figure 1. Gibberella Ear Rot

 

Fusarium Ear Rot

  • Unlike Gibberella, Fusarium infected kernels are often scattered around the cob amongst healthy looking kernels.
  • In most cases does not fuse the husk to the ear unlike Gibberella.
  • A "white streaking" or "star-bursting" can be seen on the infected kernel surface.
  • Although many Fusarium species may be responsible for these symptoms, the primary species we are concerned about in Ontario is Fusarium verticillioides which produces the toxin Fumonisin.

image of Fusarium Ear Rot

Figure 2. Fusarium Ear Rot

 

Diplodia Ear Rot

  • The characteristic ear symptom of Diplodia maydis infection is a white mould that begins at the base of the ear and can eventually cover and rot the entire ear.
  • Mould growth can also occur on the outer husk which has small black bumps (pycnidia) embedded in the mould.
  • No known mycotoxins produced.


Penicillium Ear Rot

  • Penicillium sp produces a light blue-green powdery mould which grows between the kernels and cob/husk surface.
  • Can be a serious problem if corn is stored at high moisture levels (greater 18%).
  • Ochratoxins can be produced

image of Diplodia Ear Rot and Penicillium Ear Rot

Figure 3. Diplodia Ear Rot and Penicillium Ear Rot

 

Cladosporium Ear Rot

  • Cladosporium was particularly prominent in 2009.
  • Delayed maturity, frost events and wet conditions contributed to the Cladosporium development
  • Cladosporium produces a black mould on the ear and kernel surface. Cladosporium grows mainly on the kernel surface or between kernels and are not great colonizers. They are often referred to as "surface contaminants" and therefore the mould (mycelium) they produce rubs of easily. Basically as the corn dries often the Cladosporium mould dries as well and some friction such as combining will remove it to some degree.
  • Cladopsorium does not produce any known toxins and if properly stored or ensiled mould growth should stop under anaerobic (oxygen-free) conditions.

image of Cladosporium Ear Rot

Figure 4. Cladosporium Ear Rot

 

 


For more information:
Toll Free: 1-877-424-1300 
Local: (519) 826-4047 
E-mail: ag.info.omafra@ontario.ca 

 

Views: 182

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Farm Credit Canada Releases 2026 Hog Outlook

Farm Credit Canada is forecasting a profitable year for the pork sector, similar to last year.

Ag in the House: Feb. 2 – 6

An MP wanted answers about a proposed rail line and how it could affect farmers

Making Soybeans Great Again! And A Fools Gold?

Markets moved sharply during the week of February 2 to 6 as soybeans rallied on trade news while energy, livestock and equities strengthened and metals and cryptocurrencies weakened.

Food Freedom Day 2026 - What Canada’s Grocery Costs Really Tell Us

The Canadian Federation of Agriculture says Canadians reached Food Freedom Day on February 8, 2026 the point at which the average household has earned enough income to pay for a full year of groceries.

USDA Official Calls California’s Prop 12 a Threat to a Unified U.S. Pork Market

A senior USDA official has renewed strong criticism of California’s Proposition 12, calling the state’s animal housing and product sale standards a form of domestic trade protectionism that could disrupt the national pork market and raise costs for producers and consumers. At a recent agriculture policy event, the deputy secretary of agriculture described laws like Prop 12 as creating de-facto trade barriers within the United States. Under the complaint, when a single state sets production standards that apply not just to products sold from within the state but to all products entering its borders, it can place producers in other regions at a competitive disadvantage. Prop 12, first approved by California voters in 2018, sets minimum space requirements for certain livestock and prohibits the sale of pork and other animal products in California that do not meet those standards. Because California represents a large share of U.S. pork consumption but only a small share of production, t

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service