Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

Gibberella Ear Rot

 

  • The most common and important ear mould in Ontario is Gibberella zeae which is the sexual reproductive stage of Fusarium graminearium
  • Infection often begins at the ear tip and moves down towards the ear base.
  • Although the fungus can produce a white-coloured mould which makes it difficult to tell apart from Fusarium Kernel Rot, the two can be distinguished easily when Gibberella produces its characteristic red or pink colour mould.
  • Toxins produced by Gibberella include Deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin or DON), Zearalenone (ZEN) and T-2 toxin. If grain is to be used for feed, a myctoxin test is recommended.
  • Reducing toxin levels by combine adjustment and grain cleaning is difficult

 

Image of Gibberella Ear Rot

Figure 1. Gibberella Ear Rot

 

Fusarium Ear Rot

  • Unlike Gibberella, Fusarium infected kernels are often scattered around the cob amongst healthy looking kernels.
  • In most cases does not fuse the husk to the ear unlike Gibberella.
  • A "white streaking" or "star-bursting" can be seen on the infected kernel surface.
  • Although many Fusarium species may be responsible for these symptoms, the primary species we are concerned about in Ontario is Fusarium verticillioides which produces the toxin Fumonisin.

image of Fusarium Ear Rot

Figure 2. Fusarium Ear Rot

 

Diplodia Ear Rot

  • The characteristic ear symptom of Diplodia maydis infection is a white mould that begins at the base of the ear and can eventually cover and rot the entire ear.
  • Mould growth can also occur on the outer husk which has small black bumps (pycnidia) embedded in the mould.
  • No known mycotoxins produced.


Penicillium Ear Rot

  • Penicillium sp produces a light blue-green powdery mould which grows between the kernels and cob/husk surface.
  • Can be a serious problem if corn is stored at high moisture levels (greater 18%).
  • Ochratoxins can be produced

image of Diplodia Ear Rot and Penicillium Ear Rot

Figure 3. Diplodia Ear Rot and Penicillium Ear Rot

 

Cladosporium Ear Rot

  • Cladosporium was particularly prominent in 2009.
  • Delayed maturity, frost events and wet conditions contributed to the Cladosporium development
  • Cladosporium produces a black mould on the ear and kernel surface. Cladosporium grows mainly on the kernel surface or between kernels and are not great colonizers. They are often referred to as "surface contaminants" and therefore the mould (mycelium) they produce rubs of easily. Basically as the corn dries often the Cladosporium mould dries as well and some friction such as combining will remove it to some degree.
  • Cladopsorium does not produce any known toxins and if properly stored or ensiled mould growth should stop under anaerobic (oxygen-free) conditions.

image of Cladosporium Ear Rot

Figure 4. Cladosporium Ear Rot

 

 


For more information:
Toll Free: 1-877-424-1300 
Local: (519) 826-4047 
E-mail: ag.info.omafra@ontario.ca 

 

Views: 198

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Ottawa unveils National Food Security Strategy

The 10-year plan is designed to support farmers and lower grocery costs

Markets Slip as Corn Hits New Lows While Wheat Shows Strength

The podcast highlights falling corn prices, stable wheat demand, weak crude oil, and upcoming weather risks. Experts suggest current conditions may create buying opportunities for livestock farmers and long term investors.

Canadian Firm Buhler Versatile Buys ATLAS Group Assets

Buhler Versatile has finalized an agreement to acquire Germany’s ATLAS Group, a strategic move expected to preserve jobs, ensure business continuity, and expand its global market.

ABP Working Groups address key issues

From traceability to trade structure, coal mining to wildlife conflict, ABP has active working groups on four of the most important files facing Alberta beef producers. Here are updates from each of the groups: Traceability Following the direction of resolutions carried by delegates at the 2026 Annual General Meeting, ABP’s board is forming a dedicated Traceability Working Group. The working group will examine traceability closely, with the objective of providing producer-driven feedback and solutions that reflect on-the-ground realities across Alberta’s beef sector. Members of the working group are being finalized, and will include representatives from ABP’s executive, directors and delegates; partner cattle organizations; and groups such as the Government of Alberta. The working group will be supported by a dedicated facilitator to maintain clear timelines, while also ensuring issues are thoroughly examined. The goal is to develop realistic, workable recommendations to present t

What drives the true cost of forage production?

New COP Network benchmarks reveal what drives forage production costs in Canadian cow-calf operations, from hay and silage to greenfeed, and where producers can improve efficiency. Forage is the backbone of every cow-calf operation — but how much does it really cost to grow? While feed is often viewed as a “homegrown” input, the reality is that forage production can make or break cost competitiveness, especially as input costs continue to rise. Data from the Canadian Cow-calf Cost of Production Network show wide differences in the cost of producing forages such as hay, corn silage, corn for grazing, cereal silage, and greenfeed. But the real insight isn’t just what those costs are, it’s why they differ from farm to farm. Forage costs vary, management matters This analysis includes data from 59 COP Network benchmark farms from 2020 to 2024, covering five major forage types — hay, corn silage, corn for grazing, cereal silage, and greenfeed. Hay remains the dominant forage on Canadia

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service