Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

Gibberella Ear Rot

 

  • The most common and important ear mould in Ontario is Gibberella zeae which is the sexual reproductive stage of Fusarium graminearium
  • Infection often begins at the ear tip and moves down towards the ear base.
  • Although the fungus can produce a white-coloured mould which makes it difficult to tell apart from Fusarium Kernel Rot, the two can be distinguished easily when Gibberella produces its characteristic red or pink colour mould.
  • Toxins produced by Gibberella include Deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin or DON), Zearalenone (ZEN) and T-2 toxin. If grain is to be used for feed, a myctoxin test is recommended.
  • Reducing toxin levels by combine adjustment and grain cleaning is difficult

 

Image of Gibberella Ear Rot

Figure 1. Gibberella Ear Rot

 

Fusarium Ear Rot

  • Unlike Gibberella, Fusarium infected kernels are often scattered around the cob amongst healthy looking kernels.
  • In most cases does not fuse the husk to the ear unlike Gibberella.
  • A "white streaking" or "star-bursting" can be seen on the infected kernel surface.
  • Although many Fusarium species may be responsible for these symptoms, the primary species we are concerned about in Ontario is Fusarium verticillioides which produces the toxin Fumonisin.

image of Fusarium Ear Rot

Figure 2. Fusarium Ear Rot

 

Diplodia Ear Rot

  • The characteristic ear symptom of Diplodia maydis infection is a white mould that begins at the base of the ear and can eventually cover and rot the entire ear.
  • Mould growth can also occur on the outer husk which has small black bumps (pycnidia) embedded in the mould.
  • No known mycotoxins produced.


Penicillium Ear Rot

  • Penicillium sp produces a light blue-green powdery mould which grows between the kernels and cob/husk surface.
  • Can be a serious problem if corn is stored at high moisture levels (greater 18%).
  • Ochratoxins can be produced

image of Diplodia Ear Rot and Penicillium Ear Rot

Figure 3. Diplodia Ear Rot and Penicillium Ear Rot

 

Cladosporium Ear Rot

  • Cladosporium was particularly prominent in 2009.
  • Delayed maturity, frost events and wet conditions contributed to the Cladosporium development
  • Cladosporium produces a black mould on the ear and kernel surface. Cladosporium grows mainly on the kernel surface or between kernels and are not great colonizers. They are often referred to as "surface contaminants" and therefore the mould (mycelium) they produce rubs of easily. Basically as the corn dries often the Cladosporium mould dries as well and some friction such as combining will remove it to some degree.
  • Cladopsorium does not produce any known toxins and if properly stored or ensiled mould growth should stop under anaerobic (oxygen-free) conditions.

image of Cladosporium Ear Rot

Figure 4. Cladosporium Ear Rot

 

 


For more information:
Toll Free: 1-877-424-1300 
Local: (519) 826-4047 
E-mail: ag.info.omafra@ontario.ca 

 

Views: 213

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

2025-2026 Year in Review Showcases Impacts of Beef Producer Investments

What have your investments in the Canadian Beef Cattle Check-Off accomplished for the industry lately? The Beef Cattle Research Council’s 2025–2026 Year in Review highlights how producer investments and input are advancing research, addressing industry priorities and delivering practical value back to Canada’s beef producers. “The BCRC continues to enhance coordination across the broader beef system, bringing researchers and industry groups together so we can make the best use of limited resources and move solutions and benefits to producers more quickly,” said BCRC Executive Director Tracy Herbert. “The BCRC’s collaborative approach is essential as we address complex challenges and position the Canadian beef industry for long-term success.”   The 2025-2026 BCRC Year in Review provides a broad funding overview by program area and source. In the past fiscal year, the BCRC received on average $0.66 (unaudited) of every $2.50 of the Canadian Beef Cattle Check-Off collected by provincial

Pre-harvest products and how to use them

Canola growers have three primary reasons for a pre-harvest spray application: Weed control ???????Desiccation Manage uneven crop ??????????????Use scenarios for pre-harvest spray Weed control Pre-harvest can be a good time to manage weeds, especially when straight combining. The act of swathing and curing can also provide weed control. Effective control is challenging on big weeds: apply product at the recommended rate with high water volumes to penetrate the crop canopy and achieve thorough coverage. Note: Set reasonable expectations on preventing seed set. Charles Geddes, weed management scientist with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada in Lethbridge, Alberta, says: “There is no easy way to tell if weeds will have mature seed, but in my experience, it happens earlier than one might think. I suggest that the latest a weed should be left is until it is flowering. Once it starts to flower, then some of the seed can mature on the plant after it is terminated. From a weed management p

Pre-harvest glyphosate staging tips help produce market-ready crops

As harvest approaches, Keep it Clean is reminding Canadian canola, cereal and pulse growers to follow proper staging practices for pre-harvest glyphosate application to help protect crop marketability and preserve access to domestic and export markets. Applying pre-harvest glyphosate for weed control too early can result in unacceptable product residues in harvested grain. Keep it Clean’s Pre-Harvest Glyphosate Staging Guide provides visual examples to help growers identify when grain moisture content in canola, cereals and pulses is less than 30 per cent – the only stage at which pre-harvest glyphosate may be applied. Where allowed, glyphosate is registered for pre-harvest weed control and is not to be used as a desiccant. Pre-harvest glyphosate may only be applied when grain moisture content is less than 30 per cent in the least mature part of the field, including any areas of regrowth that may produce seed. “Glyphosate is an important tool in the grower’s toolbox for crop manage

Safeguarding Cereals Against Allergens

Maintaining a reputation for clean, safe grain is essential for both domestic and international markets. Shipments contaminated with allergenic grains can lead to costly rejections, recalls and long-term damage to market confidence. Unintentional mingling of allergenic grains with cereals is a concern for export markets and must be actively managed.  Certain crop types can be allergen sources in our export markets. When these crops are unintentionally mixed with cereals, they can pose serious food safety and market access risks.   Common allergen sources in grain exports include:  Mustard   Soy   Buckwheat   Buckwheat is considered highly allergenic, and even very small amounts mixed into wheat, barley or oats can cause severe reactions in some markets. Because of these risks, many export markets apply strict limits for allergenic material in cereal shipments.  How allergens can contaminate grain  Allergen contamination most often occurs through shared equipment and handling system

Canada Launches First Private Forest Owner Survey in Over 20 Years, Farmers Invited to Participate

Canadian farmers who own woodlots or private forests are being asked to participate in the first national survey of private forest owners in more than 20 years.

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service