Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

Daynard: Critique of recent attack by George Morris Centre on fuel ethanol

by Terry Daynard   www.tdaynard.com

Differences of opinion are always valuable, especially when supported by thorough and objective analysis. This is what one would expect of the George Morris Centre (GMC) which bills itself as Canada’s independent agri-food think tank. The centre has released a series of reports on fuel ethanol in recent years, all highly negative, and all much weightier in opinion than analysis. Unfortunately this also applies for the one released on January 31.

The report can be found at www.georgemorris.org. I have gone through the report in some detail and offer the following comments:

My biggest criticism is that the report consistently ignores the significance of DDGS (distillers dried grains and solubles) produced during ethanol manufacture in calculations of available feed supply. Traditionally, DDGS have been considered to represent one-third of the weight of the input grain, though a recent Iowa State University report says 30%, perhaps reflecting the higher ethanol efficiency of newer plants. I’ll use 30% in numbers below. DDGS are not exactly the same as grain. They are higher in both protein and fibre, making them more desirable for some feeding uses and less so for others. In general terms, however, they are about equivalent to grain in assessing total feed supply on a provincial or national basis.

If the GMC analysts had included increased DDGS supply with expanding ethanol production, their numbers would be much different. For example, they show a graph purporting to show that US corn availability for all uses except ethanol has declined since 2000. But inclusion of the DDGS shows that there has been no reduction, despite six times more ethanol production by 2011. Total US corn-plus-DDGS supply has gone up accordingly. Similarly, when they attempt to show in another graph that the portion of US corn going to ethanol now matches that going for feed, they forget the 30%.

There are even more problems with the GMC analysis of Canadian corn supply and usage. While the writers claim that ethanol has hurt corn supply for feeding, their own graphs show the reverse. Their graphs show Canadian corn production has increased by at least 2.5 million tonnes from 2000 to 2011 with usage for ethanol up by “only” about 2 million tonnes. (The same pattern exists whether using trend-lines or only first and last year statistics.) This does not even include the DDGS supply. Domestic corn-based feed supply has grown, not shrunk, despite ethanol.

Global corn prices have increased since 2007 and ethanol is one factor. But the GMC report suggesting that ethanol is the dominant factor ignores the analyses of other analysts showing that energy costs have been a greater driver, as have international distortions in global grain trade. And remember that real corn prices declined for more than 25 years before 2007.

The GMC report blames tariffs on imported ethanol for unfairly protecting Canadian ethanol producers. But the tariff on US ethanol – the world’s largest export supplier, even to Brazil – is zero. How can it be lower?

The GMC report details and attacks government support for ethanol producers, labelling this as unfair competition for livestock producers, and appears to imply, by comparison, that the Canadian livestock and meat industries are essentially free of equivalent government support. If GMC writers had wanted to be objective, they would have compared the size of both.

Though the report largely ignores other related studies, it does reference a report released last year by the Grain Farmers of Ontario (GFO) (and co-authored by me, see www.gfo.ca/FoodvsFuel.aspx) to support its claim that local corn prices have increased by $15-20/tonne in Ontario because of ethanol. What the GFO study really showed, however, was that Ontario corn prices are the same relative to the adjacent US as they were before rapid ethanol expansion began, but would be $20/tonne lower without ethanol. This is because of expanded corn production in Ontario and Quebec. GMC authors appear to want grain farmers to take that $20 hit.

For Western Canada, the GMC report claims the 3.5% of wheat now used for ethanol is calamitous for livestock producers. When you consider that the 3.5% reduces to about 2.5% with added DDGS supply included, the GMC claim seems extreme.

The report does show that the Canadian livestock industry is doing quite well now thanks to better prices, and for that we are all very grateful. But to suggest that livestock producers must prosper at the expense of grain farmers is unhelpful.

And as for the so-called effect of these higher prices on consumers, a calculation detailed in the afore-mentioned GFO study shows that average consumers now earn enough money on average to pay the farmers’ share of annual food purchases by January 9. Ethanol production may have delayed that by about 4 hours according to the GFO study, while also reducing annual consumer gasoline purchase costs by at least $100.

The GMC study argues against increasing the mandatory ethanol content up to 10% of gasoline supply, and on that I agree with them, especially ethanol made from Canadian corn, at least for now. The current production and usage of corn ethanol in Canada represents a good balance between the environmental and rural economic benefits provided by ethanol inclusion in gasoline with minor effects on other end users. (By contrast, there should be more scope for ethanol production from wheat, and cellulosic ethanol will eventually become more significant.) But the GMC argument would have been decidedly more credible if presented in a more objective manner, and perhaps with more background research.

A common complaint about the George Morris Centre has been that some of its analyses often seem driven more by ideology than impartial analysis. That pattern continues.

Views: 171

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Comment by John Schwartzentruber on February 16, 2012 at 7:29am

"But to suggest that livestock producers must prosper at the expense of grain farmers is unhelpful."

Terry, would you consider it "helpful" to see the grain industry prosper at the expense of the livestock industry?

I'm sure that you need no reminder of where the great majority of Ontario grains are marketed. An accurate illustration would be asking your wife to continue to clean the house, cook the meals and do the laundry while you cavort on the dance floor (or elsewhere) with the gorgeous blonde who just showed up at the door.

As the livestock industry in Ontario continues to die off, the grains industry becomes more and more reliant on other markets AND we need to import more meats from other areas. Does this make sense in any way? (Well I suppose it does for the grain industry, as more grains need to be diverted into biofuels to fuel the greater movement of goods - so "green" . . . )

The only way that biofuels production is fair is if competing industries receive equal subsidies. And we know that is not going to happen, nor do I want it to.

That the battered livestock industry has had to compete with heavily subsidized biofuels plants for their resources is a travesty at best. There is a strong possibility that all Ontarians will pay dearly for this government-sponsored fiasco in the long run. What a surprise.

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Ag Canada Forecasts Biggest Durum Crop in Five Years

Canada could produce its largest durum crop in five years in 2025. In monthly supply-demand estimates on Wednesday that incorporated remote sensing and climate data up to July 31, 2025, Agriculture Canada estimated this year’s durum crop at 5.993 million tonnes. That is up from the government’s July forecast of 5.571 million and now slightly above the 2024 crop of 5.87 million. If accurate, it would be the largest Canadian durum crop since 2020 at 6.571 million. Ag Canada left its wheat (excl durum) production forecast unchanged from last month at 28.862 million tonnes, down from 29.088 million in 2024. But with the larger durum crop factored in, Canadian all wheat production for 2025-26 is now seen at 34.855 million tonnes, compared to 34.433 million in July and 34.958 million a year earlier. With durum planted and harvested area unchanged from last month, the increase in production is due to an improved average yield estimate of 34 bu/acre. That is up from 31.6 bu in July and m

Secretary Rollins Prioritizes American Energy on National Forest Lands

U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins today issued a memorandum announcing a new policy directive prioritizing land use efficiency when evaluating proposals for power generation projects on National Forest System lands. The Secretary’s Memorandum (PDF, 1.4 MB) underscores USDA’s commitment to strengthening American energy production and reducing reliance on foreign energy sources, like foreign adversary-manufactured solar panels, while protecting our lands for future generations. The Memorandum instructs the U.S. Forest Service to develop new screening criteria that measure and prioritize the amount of energy produced per acre of land while ensuring projects are consistent with environmental stewardship, multiple-use principles, and economic benefits for rural communities. Projects demonstrating higher land use efficiency, producing more power with less land disturbance, will be prioritized. “America has the resources and ingenuity to power our future without depending on f

Cyber-agricultural future arrives now

Drones flying over fields to assess crop status. Tractors steering autonomously, guided by soil maps to deliver tailored doses of fertilizer. Robots in the rows harvesting high-value fruits. What was recently science fiction may already be available from a nearby agricultural retailer. The farm of the future is arriving, thanks in large part to Iowa State University researchers Soumik Sarkar and Asheesh “Danny” Singh. “Iowa State has been at the forefront of creating a new discipline, cyber-agricultural systems (CAS), which brings together many areas of expertise to address big agricultural problems and create opportunities for smart, connected and response- agile farms, which could hardly have been imagined a few years ago,” said Singh, G.F. Sprague Chair in agronomy. Cyber-agricultural systems draw from mathematics, engineering and computer science, building on cyber-physical systems that have revolutionized industries like manufacturing, aerospace engineering and transportation.

Manage pigweeds with cover crops

Pigweeds are among the most difficult weeds to manage in row crop systems due to their rapid growth, high seed production and widespread herbicide resistance. During the past two decades, reliance on herbicides for weed management has led to the evolution of resistance in Palmer amaranth populations to several herbicides, particularly ALS -- acetolactate synthase -- glyphosate and PPO-inhibitors. That reality has intensified the need for integrated weed management strategies, including non-chemical practices such as cover crops. Recent research from the University of Nebraska–Lincoln sheds light on how cover crop management decisions such as planting time, species selection and termination timing influence pigweed -- Palmer amaranth, waterhemp, redroot pigweed and smooth pigweed -- suppression. In a comprehensive meta-analysis of 41 field studies conducted across the United States and Canada from 1994 to 2024, researchers evaluated how various cover crop strategies affected the densit

Career Opportunity: Agronomist - Grower Relations

About SaskOilseeds SaskOilseeds is a grower-led organization committed to advancing the success of Saskatchewan’s oilseed industry through research, knowledge transfer, and advocacy. SaskOilseeds collects a levy from registered Saskatchewan canola and flax growers to fund research and knowledge transfer initiatives, advocate for favorable policy at both provincial and national levels, and develop market opportunities domestically and internationally. Our work is grounded in science, fueled by collaboration, and focused on delivering lasting value to producers. The Opportunity We are seeking an Agronomist – Grower Relations to strengthen our connections with farmers, agricultural retailers, independent agronomists, industry partners, and other external stakeholders. This role is responsible for facilitating the extension of research investment outcomes and agronomic resources developed by SaskOilseeds, ensuring timely dissemination of information and reinforcing our position as a tru

© 2025   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service