Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

OFA: Mark Wales, Leading The Way For The Future Of Food.

By Mark Wales, Vice President of the Ontario Federation of Agriculture

The Globe and Mail recently published a poignant feature on eight key issues Canadians need to talk about now to become leaders for the future. One of which is the future of food.

The series tackled sensitive food topics in Canada, such as lack of foreign food inspections, country of origin labelling, corporate buyouts for family farms, genetic modification and the local food movement. The area most concerning however asked whether Canada is equipped to maintain its position as a leading agricultural supplier.

Agriculture has always been a thriving industry in Canada, with our farmers being recognized as leaders in the agriculture sector globally. But over the past 15 years, that image has changed. Canada has dropped from third to ninth as a global food exporter and Brazil recently replaced Canada as the third largest exporter of agricultural product behind the U.S. and the European Union.

Another concern is Canada’s strengthening dollar. Rising dollar value in Canada is causing our farmers to lose market share in the global agriculture economy and the debt-to-loan ratio for farmers is rising as a result.

The time is now to start implementing solutions that will safeguard our agriculture sector and food supply to reinstate Canada’s role as a global food producer.

The Ontario Federation of Agriculture is working closely with the Canadian Federation of Agriculture to establish new opportunities to secure Canada’s agriculture future through the National Food Strategy. The objectives of the Strategy are to begin building a profitable foundation for the future of our farm sector now to ensure that we have plans in place for tackling larger populations and resulting food shortages in the future. At this stage public consultation is vital in order to reduce red-tape in the government regulatory process, influence technology innovations, and identify opportunities to promote Canada’s products as the foremost choice for Canadian dinner tables. We aim to have a working National Food Strategy available within a year that will be used by government and the agri-food sector when creating new policies that will secure a profitable and sustainable future for Canadian farmers.

The CFA recently launched www.nationalfoodstrategy.ca to provide Canadians with an outline of the National Food Strategy and a clear vision for what it could achieve for the agriculture community.

We also have an opportunity to demonstrate the value of food in Canada. Too often, we take our food supply for granted thinking food will always be available to feed our nation. However, a predicted population boom to 9.2 billion by 2050 will result in a mass food shortage around the world – this is a call-to-action to find ways to add more value to our food supply today, and bring more attention to the potential food shortage of the future.

If we continue to collaborate with our partners and work together to establish a vision for Canada’s future, we have the potential to make a significant contribution to Canada’s role as a top food producer globally.

For those who have not had a chance to see the “Time to Lead” series, we encourage you to visit the Globe and Mail online to view videos, read the articles and see comments from Canadians on the issue. It’s time to ask yourself what kind of future you envision for you and your family. It’s not enough to sit back and wait for catastrophe before we act. The time is now to find new avenues together to secure a sustainable future for farming.

Views: 51

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Comment by Joann on December 29, 2010 at 9:05am

Your commentary, Mr. Wales, titled Leading the Way for the Future of Food, has left me confused and a tad bit fustrated.   As you are a Vice President of the Ontario Federation of Agriculture, I am also surprised how you twist some of your terminology to further a national discussion at the publics' expense.

 

Confucius said “If names be not correct, language is not in accordance with the truth of things. If language be not in accordance with the truth of things, affairs cannot be carried on to
succes
s".

 

Agriculture is defined as a class of people that till the soil a/o raise stock.  It is about persons with skills a/o tools, interacting with natural resourses.

 

Agriculture is not an industry.  Agriculture is not a zoning. To say that agriculture was a thriving industry in Canada is not in accordance to the truth of things.

 

Agriculture consists of two components.  It is about the liberty and security of “property” inalienable with the liberty and security of “persons”.   If there is no person, there cannot be agriculture.  That is a simple truth.

 

You state "Too often, we take our food supply for granted thinking food will always be available to feed our nation."  and yet your commentary appears to take farmers for granted.  You separate the natural resources from the very person that makes the meaning of agriculture true and meaningful.

 

I also find it curious that you wish to collaborate with partners about the future of of food supply policies when you fail to mention our present supply laws and the source of our domestic marketing rights, duties and obligations. 

 

A little research will show that the King/Queen of Great Britain “granted” property to “persons” under Seal through an ancient system called Free and Common Socage in certain parts of Canada. The Crown awarded the "possession of the soil and climate" to individual farmers via signed and Sealed contracts that bind farmers with individual rights, duties and obligations especially to the terms and conditions of the Covenant Chain. These sovereign contracts legally bind farmers to domestic production and marketing obligations. 

 

You fail to mention the clause in our present constitution concerning marketing whereby "persons" shall be issued "licenses to trade without fee or reward". Sovereign marketing licenses allow for transportation rights on every road (rivers, roads, railroads, etc) in Ontario.


Where does our constitutional marketing rights fit in your proposed National Food Strategy discussions?  What is the national importance to the sovereign licenses to trade and how does it impact our domestic food supply?


There is an old Latin maxim that states; “Ignorantia legis neminem excusat translated to “ignorance of the law excuses no one”.

 

As an elected member of a provincial agricultural organization, would it not be prudent to investigate existing agricultural rights that were put in place centuries ago to protect the domestic population before suggestion any changes?


Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

2025-2026 Year in Review Showcases Impacts of Beef Producer Investments

What have your investments in the Canadian Beef Cattle Check-Off accomplished for the industry lately? The Beef Cattle Research Council’s 2025–2026 Year in Review highlights how producer investments and input are advancing research, addressing industry priorities and delivering practical value back to Canada’s beef producers. “The BCRC continues to enhance coordination across the broader beef system, bringing researchers and industry groups together so we can make the best use of limited resources and move solutions and benefits to producers more quickly,” said BCRC Executive Director Tracy Herbert. “The BCRC’s collaborative approach is essential as we address complex challenges and position the Canadian beef industry for long-term success.”   The 2025-2026 BCRC Year in Review provides a broad funding overview by program area and source. In the past fiscal year, the BCRC received on average $0.66 (unaudited) of every $2.50 of the Canadian Beef Cattle Check-Off collected by provincial

Pre-harvest products and how to use them

Canola growers have three primary reasons for a pre-harvest spray application: Weed control ???????Desiccation Manage uneven crop ??????????????Use scenarios for pre-harvest spray Weed control Pre-harvest can be a good time to manage weeds, especially when straight combining. The act of swathing and curing can also provide weed control. Effective control is challenging on big weeds: apply product at the recommended rate with high water volumes to penetrate the crop canopy and achieve thorough coverage. Note: Set reasonable expectations on preventing seed set. Charles Geddes, weed management scientist with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada in Lethbridge, Alberta, says: “There is no easy way to tell if weeds will have mature seed, but in my experience, it happens earlier than one might think. I suggest that the latest a weed should be left is until it is flowering. Once it starts to flower, then some of the seed can mature on the plant after it is terminated. From a weed management p

Pre-harvest glyphosate staging tips help produce market-ready crops

As harvest approaches, Keep it Clean is reminding Canadian canola, cereal and pulse growers to follow proper staging practices for pre-harvest glyphosate application to help protect crop marketability and preserve access to domestic and export markets. Applying pre-harvest glyphosate for weed control too early can result in unacceptable product residues in harvested grain. Keep it Clean’s Pre-Harvest Glyphosate Staging Guide provides visual examples to help growers identify when grain moisture content in canola, cereals and pulses is less than 30 per cent – the only stage at which pre-harvest glyphosate may be applied. Where allowed, glyphosate is registered for pre-harvest weed control and is not to be used as a desiccant. Pre-harvest glyphosate may only be applied when grain moisture content is less than 30 per cent in the least mature part of the field, including any areas of regrowth that may produce seed. “Glyphosate is an important tool in the grower’s toolbox for crop manage

Safeguarding Cereals Against Allergens

Maintaining a reputation for clean, safe grain is essential for both domestic and international markets. Shipments contaminated with allergenic grains can lead to costly rejections, recalls and long-term damage to market confidence. Unintentional mingling of allergenic grains with cereals is a concern for export markets and must be actively managed.  Certain crop types can be allergen sources in our export markets. When these crops are unintentionally mixed with cereals, they can pose serious food safety and market access risks.   Common allergen sources in grain exports include:  Mustard   Soy   Buckwheat   Buckwheat is considered highly allergenic, and even very small amounts mixed into wheat, barley or oats can cause severe reactions in some markets. Because of these risks, many export markets apply strict limits for allergenic material in cereal shipments.  How allergens can contaminate grain  Allergen contamination most often occurs through shared equipment and handling system

Canada Launches First Private Forest Owner Survey in Over 20 Years, Farmers Invited to Participate

Canadian farmers who own woodlots or private forests are being asked to participate in the first national survey of private forest owners in more than 20 years.

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service