Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

Agricorp Looking For $30 Million Back From Ontario Farmers. Any thoughts or opinions on this situation?

Mishap by Agricorp Leaves Ontario Farmers on the hook for $30 Million

Agricorp Processing Errors Come Back to Bite Farmers Hard

By Amanda Brodhagen, Farms.com

Over 4,500 Ontario farmers received a letter from Agricorp this month informing them that they need to cough-up money to the provincial government dating as far back as 11 years ago. Agricorp claims that the money farmers owe is from overpayments that the agency made to farm support programs. The processing errors are on the agencies end, not the farmers. The fluke totals $30,000 million with the average payment of $6,000 each farmer involved. The agency expects farmers to pay back the money over the next three years.

Farmers are outraged by Agricorp’s request and say that the debt is so old that they can’t verify it. Donald Good a lawyer based out of Ottawa who specializes in agriculture issues is coming to the farmer’s defense saying that negligence from the government to pull this stunt and argues that some farmers shouldn’t have to pay back the money.

The unfortunate part is that Agricop didn’t fess up sooner. A 2008 report entitled “Agri-corp Far, Support Programs” disclosed that Agricrop had recorded $24 million in overpayments with no plan to get the money back. Agricorp’s demands 11 years later are causing a real hardship for farmers who have invested the money into their businesses and in some cases have since retired.

The government has put themselves in a sticky situation and mismanagement shouldn’t be a valid excuse for the government to be holding farmers accountable for their mistakes.

Views: 563

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I would hardly call the actions of Agricorp, reassessing applications as a "mishap" nor a "fluke".

But, if the government insists on clawing back, what they term as 'overpayments'... money dispensed through various support programs in goodwill....programs supported by the federal government through a 60/40 equation......will Ontario be returning the federal portion also?

It makes a person wonder why our federal counterpart does not want to participate with Ontario.....in support programs such as RMP.....or why farmers are so skeptical...........

▶ Reply to Discussion

RSS

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

John Deere Plans Major U.S. Manufacturing Changes

John Deere is reorganizing its U.S. manufacturing network, with production shifts involving windrowers, round balers, Hagie STS sprayers and small planters.

AED Calls for Stronger Canada-U.S. Trade Relations

The Associated Equipment Distributors urges Canada to prioritize free and fair trade under CUSMA to protect cross-border supply chains and prevent rising costs for businesses.

Kalon Armstrong joins Nofence as managing director for Canada

Armstrong will lead the commercial launch of Nofence

NASA Uses Satellite Imagery to Assess Ukraine Harvests

Using satellite imagery, NASA Harvest effectively monitored Ukrainian crop conditions and harvest activity during the war, providing critical data to support global food security.

How the Ford government’s new omnibus bill could affect Ontarians’ say in environmental decisions

On its first day back after a 21-week break, the government under Premier Doug Ford introduced a sweeping bill that could change how Ontarians learn about provincial decisions affecting the environment — and what residents can do if they disagree. By day two, Bill 140, the Building Ontario Faster Act, 2026, reached second reading. But it didn’t sit well with the opposition. “The government does not want people to tell them what they think. I very much would like the public to have a chance to participate in their democracy,” Oshawa MPP Jennifer K. French said during debate at Queen’s Park on Oct. 28. For more than three decades, the Environmental Bill of Rights has given Ontarians a formal role in government decisions that could affect their air, water, land and communities. “It gives the public a wide range of tools that they can use to protect themselves and protect the environment,” Richard Lindgren, a lawyer with the Canadian Environmental Law Association said. “But if Bill 140

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service