Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

Here's an opinion piece printed in the Winnipeg Free Press....notice the author and her affiliations...

Forty-six thousand, four hundred -- that's the number of lives lost this year to date in reported barn fires across Canada. No, these are not human lives; they are animals, namely pigs, chickens, sheep, goats, cows, horses and rabbits.
It shouldn't matter that the lives are animals, not human, but it does. That is, according to Manitoba's fire code. The dearth of employees in most livestock barns means buildings are not required to have smoke alarms, sprinkler systems or other fire prevention measures because animals are not considered occupants worth protecting.

The majority of these barns are intensive livestock operations, where animals are held in confinement systems that limit their mobility. Pigs in gestation crates are held in two-foot by seven-foot stalls so restrictive they can barely lie down. Turning around is impossible. Hens in egg operations are crammed five to six in a battery cage, stacked atop one another, rows upon rows. Food and water are delivered via electronic feed and watering systems. The factory nature of most livestock operations means few people are present, with the exception of those needed to perform a handful of management tasks.

A large livestock operation, such as a swine farrowing unit, could house thousands of animals and may employ only 10 to 15 full-time employees. During a fire, animals are stuck, imprisoned, unable to escape and impossible to rescue, while a fire rages around them as they suffer from smoke inhalation and worse, being burned alive.

Photos from the burned out barns show charred bodies of animals, some with exploded abdomens, and sows confined in gestation crates fruitlessly attempting to climb out of their crates.

If the miserable life of these animals cramped in barren confinement systems is not horrific enough, they are becoming increasingly vulnerable to being burned alive in an epidemic of fires that have been sweeping barns across Western Canada.

Manitoba saw an eight-fold increase in the numbers of animals killed during barn fires in 2008: 31,013 animals burned to death, predominantly pigs. In recent months, a staggering 15,000 pigs burned alive on July 31 at Cluny Colony in Cluny, Alberta, and a further 2,400 pigs burned alive in Derwent, Alberta on Aug. 17. On July 7, 25,000 chickens died in a Kleefeld, Manitoba, fire. Already this year, 19,000 more animals have died in fires across Canada than in 2008.

In addition to lost animal lives, there are significant economic repercussions in the form of insurance payouts, and lost jobs and livelihoods.

While the Manitoba Fire Commissioner's office considers mandating alarms and sprinklers in new buildings, fires rage on in old ones. This code, if adopted, will apply to new buildings only and will not require that existing buildings be retrofitted with alarms and sprinkler systems.

The construction of new hog barns in Manitoba, however, is virtually non-existent due to a moratorium on new pig barns in already-saturated parts of Manitoba. Furthermore, the proposed code is insufficient. A "medium" or "light industrial" classification on these barns means that farm buildings with fewer than 75 employees would not be required to be equipped with smoke alarms. (Sprinklers would be required if buildings are of a certain size but without alarms, sprinklers are futile since fires burn through the barns so quickly.)

A classification of "high risk industrial" is needed to reflect the particularly flammable nature of these barns -- pig waste contains the highly combustible and explosive gases of hydrogen sulphide and methane.

While many fires have afflicted hog barns in Manitoba and Alberta, barns in other provinces have also been stricken by fires. This presents a unique opportunity for the federal government to take action, to show it cares about animal welfare as is often claimed but rarely demonstrated.

Federal Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz has promised once again to help pork producers hit by the scourge of reduced pork prices with millions in federal funds available for loans and marketing strategies. As always, Minister Ritz has shown himself to be a friend of livestock producers, but his track record on animal welfare is poor.

With the millions of dollars of federal taxpayer money available to assist pork producers, the government must earmark a portion of these funds to support the development and implementation of a Canada-wide fire prevention strategy for livestock barns, and make retrofitting smoke alarms and sprinkler systems in barns housing animal populations a condition for financial assistance. Only then will these fires be curbed.


Lynn Kavanagh is an MSc student in the animal behaviour and welfare program at the University of Guelph and a board member of the Canadian Coalition for Farm Animals.

Views: 76

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

This came up last year during one of my media interviews. Crystal MacKay was very good at getting some information to me in order to respond to the questions. You can find a lot of the information at OFAC's website under Animal Resources - go to Livestock Emergency Resources.
Anytime there is a fire it is not good - especially when a life is lost: human, your prize cow, or even the barn cat. We currently have seen stricter regulations for building codes (relating to fire) in highrises and condominiums. Some industry reps have also been diligent in getting out the word on fire prevention. A lot has been learned and we are still learning more (ie. - ammonia gas and corroding electrical connections). Fire prevention will save a lot of losses - monetary and life.
One comment that has been stated to me though - if a fire alarm goes off - does the pig know how to open the doors?
Another comment about this - the writer is focusing on large barns in western Canada. I toured some of these areas in 2000 (Manitoba) when the barns were popping up - many miles from the nearest house and fire department.
The press release I was questioned by the media on was actually from February 4, 2009 and it used the same numbers as stated above (except for the recent fires of course). The press release came from an animal alliance environmnet voters party (Canada) and the coalition for farm animals as above.

Wayne

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Low commodity prices and high input costs a double whammy for Manitoba farmers

Manitoba farmers are facing a perfect storm of low grain prices and soaring fertilizer costs that are threatening profitability for both the current harvest and next year’s crop. Current harvest delivery prices have fallen to $7 per bushel for hard red spring wheat, $13.25 for canola, $11 for soybeans and $4 for oats, representing harvest pricing typically seed at the lows of a pricing cycle. On the cost side, fertilizer costs have climbed significantly from the numbers used in Manitoba Ag’s 2025 crop cost of production guide, which was compiled last November.  Urea has jumped to $850-900 per metric tonne, about 30 per cent higher than the $690 per tonne used in those calculations. Data from Manitoba Ag show a surge in crop production costs in 2022.  Those have stayed elevated and, when combined with current grain prices, the cost pressure is particularly acute.

US wheat finds new markets in Asia

Flour millers in Asia have ramped up imports of U.S. wheat in recent weeks, driven by competitive prices from American suppliers and delays in shipments from the Black Sea. Indonesian importers have finalized deals for around 500,000 tons, while buyers in Bangladesh secured about 250,000 tons and millers in Sri Lanka acquired around 100,000 tons. Millers are taking both U.S. soft white wheat and hard red winter wheat varieties. Apparently, there were some weather issues which delayed cargoes from the Black Sea region, and U.S. prices have been pretty competitive. This is additional demand for U.S. wheat in Asia, complementing purchases by traditional buyers such as Thailand, the Philippines and Taiwan.

Federal, Provincial and Territorial Ministers of Agriculture (FPT) Meetings Highlight Farmer Concerns

Industry leaders and government officials kicked off the FPT meetings at a Manitoba farm. Farmers and representatives from the Canola Council of Canada (CCC), CCGA, and provincial commissions shared their concerns directly with Minister MacDonald and Parliamentary Secretary Kody Blois. A key message was clear: farmers cannot borrow their way through these trade disputes, they were not of their making. Farmers are feeling the damage directly in their pockets. With canola selling at a discount between $60-$100/tonne...on an average 20MMT crop, that translates to estimated losses of $1.2–2.0 billion from lost exports to China. Federal Announcements: Some Support, but Gaps Remain The federal government announced $370 million in biofuel funding and additional trade diversification support. While these measures are a step in the right direction, they fall short of addressing the direct impact on canola farmers and exporters in lost bookings. Concerns remain over the lack of timelines for re

The Last Word (For Now) on Rest Stops During Long-Distance Transport

When the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) began to muse about requiring that cattle be unloaded and provided with a rest stop after 36 hours of transportation, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) and Canada’s beef industry funded a series of research projects led by Karen Schwartzkopf-Genswein’s team at AAFC’s Lethbridge Research Station to determine whether a rest stop would benefit weaned calves. The research began before the regulations were revised, but the regulations were revised before the research could be completed. Three consecutive research trials conducted in 2018, 2019 and 2020 found that providing a rest stop during long haul transportation offered no consistent, measurable benefits for animal welfare. A companion project led by Trevor Alexander at AAFC Lethbridge looked at bacterial populations in the respiratory tract of those same calves. In September 2023, this column described how microbiological testing from the 2018 transportation trial found that rested

Federal Plastics Registry has new compliance requirement

The federal government has created new reporting requirements under its new Federal Plastics Registry. The registry is being phased in over a few years, however phase 1 requires Canadian brand owners to report on plastic packaging placed on the market by September 29, 2025, for the 2024 calendar year.

© 2025   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service