Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

Ohio Dairy Farm Animal Abuse Video Outrages the Ag Industry...find out more...what do you think?

Shaun Haney has this great post on his website RealAgriculture.com outlining the events and follow up from the video released on the animal abuse on an Ohio Dairy Farm. What are your comments?

 

Mercy For Animals Ohio Dairy Farm Video Outrages the Agricultural Industry

An undercover surveillance video was released this week by Mercy for Animals  that is maybe one of the most disturbing things I have ever witnessed in agriculture.  Shot over a thirty day period on the Conklin Dairy Farm in Ohio, the video shows the dairy’s hired man pitchforking the stomach of a calf, head stomping and extreme physical abuse.  One could take the opinion that this is just the case of one bad apple tainting the rest of us but…..I think we as an industry need to be proactive and begin to work harder to prevent these sort of actions ever taking place again.

I will admit that I have tried to watch the video on three occasions and still have not made it through the video.  The behavior showcased is not being “old school” or “show him who’s the boss,” this is sadistic.  I really don’t have any answers but we need to get this out of our industry.  I know many dairy farmers, ranchers and feedyard owners and I have never ever seen this kind of brutality or believe that this sort of animal care would be condoned by anyone.  The livestock producers of North America do care about the livestock that they keep and treat it with the most respect.  I plead you to not take this as common practice on the farms across this continent.  Animals are not our slaves as alleged by activists, but farmers across the continent treat our animals with care and respect.

 

If you are interested to see the Mercy for Animals Video, click here, but I must warn you this is extremely sadistic behavior and viewer discretion is advised.

 

Check out Michele Payn-Knoper’s Opinion

 

Check out Eliz Greene’s Opinion

 

As an industry we need to figure out how to rid ourselves of these sort of terrible behaviors and terrible situations.  Although not regular this is an embarrassment and outrage for our industry.  The man found in this tape has been taken into custody, and rightfully so.  In this case it was a farm employee who is caught on tape and the Conklin’s (farm owner) were not involved allegedly.  So how do we prevent this from happening?  Do we need to better educate our employees?  Is the answer more monitoring?  Is the answer training and certification for the people that work with livestock?    The trouble is that I don’t think that any level of training or coaching could of changed the behavior of this brutal individual.   As an industry we need to make sure that this type of behavior never happens again.

With saying all of this there is also criticism for Mercy for Animals and how they handled this situation.  My Twitter buddy Mike Haley a farmer in Ohio discusses this situation in  agreat and informative post entitled, “UnderCover Agendas.”  Mike does a great job of discussing the questions around, why did Mercy for Animals let this behavior happen for 30 days which allowed these animals to suffer longer.  Secondly, the accusations by Mercy for Animals and HSUS that this is common practice on farms across the US and consumers need to “ditch milk.”  Thirdly Mike discusses how this video was released screams an agenda that is really not about saving the animals in the video but really about pushing the anti-agriculture agenda of HSUS in Ohio.

 

Listen to an interview with Wayne Pacelle, HSUS by BuckEyeAg

 

Below is an interview compliments of AgWeb, with the Director of the Ohio Department of Agriculture.  He responds to the Ohio Dairy Farm video
If you cannot the the below video, click here

Views: 1092

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

They are guilt as charged, and should get the full penalty, but in reference to the activists comments at the end of the video ditch crurty, ditch dairy. Is tarring people with the same brush. And to use abuse of animals is one of the oldest tac to get a polical agenda on the map. Don't get me wrong when, the proper laws are not in place to prosecute, and should be used to that end. Example the abuse of cats and dogs in China to make coat fur linings for Canada. But when radical groups feed of this and use this sort of abuse to promote an agenda for the soul purpose, of destroying a industry by saying everyone who has a Dairy does this, is wrong.
If a person were to videotape a crime they would be charged as an accessory, similar to what the actual person doing the crime would be charged. I would expect that the organization that posted the video should be charged as an accessory also.
We in agriculture need to take a stand and stand up for what is proper and what is morally correct. One way to do this is to not watch the video because the higher the traffic to the video, increases the ambition of the activists. Why do they tape the videos? To get publicity. Same as terrorists. As Bristow mentioned - it happened, a person was charged. Leave it to the authorities and work together to stop terrorism in Agriculture. Take the culprit out behind the barn for a taste of his own medicine.
I have not watched the abuse video and likely will not.

But consumers and others will watch it and probably believe this is how farmers treat their livestock...

Being good to livestock is not news and certainly not something that is going to be a hit with the Youtube crowd...

I am worried about how this portrays our industry.
Here here

Wayne Black said:
If a person were to videotape a crime they would be charged as an accessory, similar to what the actual person doing the crime would be charged. I would expect that the organization that posted the video should be charged as an accessory also.
We in agriculture need to take a stand and stand up for what is proper and what is morally correct. One way to do this is to not watch the video because the higher the traffic to the video, increases the ambition of the activists. Why do they tape the videos? To get publicity. Same as terrorists. As Bristow mentioned - it happened, a person was charged. Leave it to the authorities and work together to stop terrorism in Agriculture. Take the culprit out behind the barn for a taste of his own medicine.
Your right it foat around on you tube and the media pick up on it to boost ratings, the main stream media get most of their stories from Youtube, if not all. Then claim it as their own. The filth that run some of these media networks are no better than the people that carry out the acts and protray it as news worthy sometimes.

Rpigsrgr8 said:
I have not watched the abuse video and likely will not.

But consumers and others will watch it and probably believe this is how farmers treat their livestock...

Being good to livestock is not news and certainly not something that is going to be a hit with the Youtube crowd...

I am worried about how this portrays our industry.
If I would see animal abuse by an employee, fellow employee or family member, I would step in and put a stop to it. I could not stand by and film it. I do not know what is worse, the actual cases of abuse or the lack of response. To me the charges should be the same for both the abuser and the individual who took the film and did nothing to stop the attack. We have a God given duty to care for our animals and protect them and filming abuse is not a suitable response.
Media has such a double standard when it comes to this.
Here is a response from OFAC posted on RealAgriculture.com

Ontario Farm Animal Council Responds to the Conklin Dairy Video – Crystal Mackay


To say that last weeks release of the Mercy for Animals video from Conklin Dairy Farm was an outrage is being light. My post last week brought on some high amounts of emotion and ridicule for the people at Conklin dairy farm. In that post we also discussed the needed criticism for Mercy for Animals based on the fact they let this abuse happen for a month and did not stop it but stood there and caught it on tape. I can’t even watch the whole video, nevermind watching this happen for a month. Would they videotape a kid being abused for a month and not report it immediately. Of course not but they let these dairy cows be. It just doesn’t hold water with me at all.

Crystal Mackay is the Executive Director of the Ontario Farm animal Council and is based in Guelph. We discuss the outrage that the video has caused and why Mercy for Animals should also be criticized.

To view the video, Click Here


Personally I think the industry has responded positively by saying this is in an outrage and will not be tolerated. I completely agree with Crystal that this kind of sensationalistic showcasing of animal abuse is not in support of the humane treatment of animals at all. Anyone livestock farmer that I have talked with about this video has said the same thing, “the video is disgusting.”
An interesting end to this story - Gary Conklin will not be charged and the Conklin Dairy Farm Video was "heavily edited and creatively spliced together". Here is the story Cows, Lies and Videotape on HumanWatch.org Click here
Thanks for posting the update Sandra!
I still say the person videoing the whole thing should be charged as an accessory to the crime.

Sandra Dales said:
An interesting end to this story - Gary Conklin will not be charged and the Conklin Dairy Farm Video was "heavily edited and creatively spliced together". Here is the story Cows, Lies and Videotape on HumanWatch.org Click here

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Federal leaders promising to protect supply management

Liberal, Conservative and Bloc leaders are committed to preserving supply management

Canada invests $567M in African swine fever prevention, preparedness

The Government of Canada is committed to protecting the resilience of Canada's rural communities and the Canadian pork sector by supporting prevention efforts and preparing to respond in the event of an African swine fever outbreak. Last week Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Lawrence MacAulay announced a commitment of up to $567.16 million to support hog producers should there be a closure of key export markets for Canadian pork products and live pigs due to an ASF outbreak in Canada or the United States. While Canada remains free of ASF, a single detection of ASF in Canada would close export markets due to international trade regulations and import restrictions imposed by trading partners. Canada is heavily dependent on pork and live pig exports, and the closure of key export markets would be devastating to the pork sector. It would cause hog producers to incur extraordinary costs and force them to make difficult decisions about depopulating their herds. "Thanks to the hard wor

Using Models to Enhance Sow Productivity

Modern swine production demands precision in feeding high-prolific sows to ensure both longevity and optimal performance. Over the past decade, advances in sow genetics and feeding systems have reinforced the need for accurate nutritional programs that prevent overfeeding or underfeeding individual sows. Advanced sow nutritional and management models offer swine nutritionists reliable, data-driven insights to support long-term productivity. When provided with accurate information on sow genotype, productivity, feed programs, and barn environmental data, these models have proven effective in helping producers refine feeding strategies, optimize production, and reduce feed costs. Even minor improvements in feeding precision can result in substantial economic benefits. The role of models in sow nutrition Advanced analysis and predictive modelling capabilities can assist swine nutritionists in designing sow feeding programs by integrating complex data on genetics, production history, and

NPPC asks Canada to exclude U.S. pork from retaliatory tariffs

The National Pork Producers Council has urged the Canadian government to exempt pork from any retaliatory tariffs levied on U.S. products in response to President Trump’s duties on imports from Canada. The United States exported more than $850 million of pork to Canada in 2024, while the country sent $1.7 billion of pork to the United States. Additionally, Canada exported more than $560 million worth of live swine to the United States last year, primarily to U.S. finishing and slaughter facilities where they were comingled with U.S. swine, and much of the pork was later exported back to Canada. Trump has pledged to impose the tariffs on Canada – and China and Mexico – as a way to reduce the flow of illegal immigration and fentanyl into the United States, as well as to address an $80 billion trade deficit with Canada. In written comments to Canada’s Department of Finance, NPPC noted that “[T]he tit-for-tat tariff exchanges will disrupt supply chains that have been built up over decad

NPPC requests pork be exempt from Canada’s retaliatory tariffs

Years of work poured into building an integrated US-Canada pork market may come falling down as the Canadian government seeks to enact retaliatory tariffs on US products after the Trump administration imposed 25% tariffs on imports from Canada. In hopes of retaining the countries’ strong trade relationship, the National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) wrote to the Canadian government asking that pork products be exempt from any retaliatory tariffs levied on US products. “The tit-for-tat tariff exchanges will disrupt supply chains that have been built up over decades,” the group wrote to Canada’s International Trade Policy Division on March 21. “We request that Canada seeks to preserve the benefits of the integrated North American market to the maximum extent practicable, including by excluding US pork imports from retaliation.” In 2024, the United States exported more than $850 million worth of pork to Canada, while Canada shipped $1.7 billion lbs of pork to the United States. Canada a

© 2025   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service