Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

Potash: BHP or PCS - Which is the best deal for farmers? Farmers of North America Comment...What do you think?
 
Potash:  BHP or PCS - Which is the best deal for farmers.
 
Commentary from FNA-STAG
 
The coverage of the offer by BHP Billiton to buy potash mining giant Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan (PCS) has been missing one very important element - the potential impact on agricultural producers.  This important stakeholder is, after all, the end consumer of the important fertilizer product.
 
There has been full and complete analysis and speculation of the impact of the deal for shareholders, governments, and citizens of Saskatoon and Saskatchewan.  These are all important stakeholders to be sure, but the potential impact of the takeover on the farmer who uses that potash seems to have been left out of the mix. 
 
Bob Friesen, CEO of FNA-STAG, comments, "Have either of these companies talked about their farm customers yet?  What effect would this deal have on farmers?  Fertilizer costs are one of the biggest expenses for most farmers, but there hasn't been any talk about retail pricing and the impact it has on farmers' ability to grow the crops that feed the world".
 
Farmers are in a bad position compared to the fertilizer companies who set prices based on what they think they can extract from farmers for crop nutrients.  Add to that the small handful of potash companies out there, and you have a situation where the farmer has no choice but to pay the price that's given.
 
In June, 2008, according to a Bloomberg report, potash jumped to $650 a metric ton from $190 a year earlier.  This was in response to rising grain prices, including corn and soybeans, two major crops that use potash.  Friesen points out, "When a farmer finally catches a break and the price of grain goes up, the fertilizer companies go right after that margin by increasing the price of fertilizer." 
 
Friesen continues, "When the price of grain went up in 2008, there was a perceived food shortage and farmgate prices were blamed for some people having to go hungry.  Yet there were reports of some farmers around the world not producing because they could not afford to buy the requisite fertilizer".
 
FNA-STAG questions which company would be the best for farmers.  PCS's history of managing production to increase the price may be good for shareholders, but it has a negative impact on the price for farmers and the price of food.  It seems unlikely that they would change this monopolistic behavior.  As the potential new owner, would BHP continue the same price strategy that is used by PCS, or would they increase production and sell higher volumes?  This important question has so far not been addressed.
 
FNA-STAG also urges the Governments of Saskatchewan and Canada to consider their farm constituents and use whatever tools they have to ensure the interests of farmers and input costs are considered.  FNA-STAG's number one priority is farmer profitability and believes profitable farms are just as important to the economy as mining companies.
 
As the debate about the future of these two companies goes on, FNA-STAG would like to ask both PCS and BHP:  Do either PCS or BHP care about the impact that fertilizer prices have on farmers and what are you planning to do about it?
 

Views: 89

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Bristow on October 7, 2010 at 11:59am
As you can see by the response no one cares. You know that the price is going to go up who ever buys it. And I bet ten to one the Saskatchewan and Canadian governments will buy shares with your tax money to get the lions share out of the higher prices you will be paying, after the deal is done.

▶ Reply to Discussion

RSS

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

‘It’s another blow’: Farmers deal with surging fertilizer prices ahead of seeding

Fertilizer is an essential part of Kevin Peters’ farm in southwestern Manitoba. But since Israel and the U.S. attacked Iran, the average price of urea fertilizer, which is widely used around the world, has skyrocketed, surging around 30 per cent over the last week. Peters says the interruption in supply didn’t come as a huge surprise to him. “We deal with geopolitical issues all the time with markets, be it pork, be it grain, and now fertilizer,” he said. “There’s always some disruption seeming to happen somewhere in the world that is changing our daily prices.” Peters says he pre-purchased his fertilizer for this farming season back in the fall but is concerned about prices later this year when he has to buy fertilizer again. “We’ll see what the market looks like in eight months,” he said. Like Peters, Andrew James also pre-bought his fertilizer in the fall for his farm in Anola, Man., and he says he is happy he did. “My fertilizer bill for that (at the time) was around $350,00

From a Piece of Wire to Contaminated Feed: Preventing Foreign Material Hazards in Beef Cattle Operations

Foreign material and toxin consumption by beef cattle can lead to significant health problems, reduced performance and economic losses. Canadian cattle producers take great pride and care in how they manage their farms and ranches, from providing proper nutrition to stewarding their land and ensuring excellent animal care. Yet even with the best intentions, foreign materials and toxins can quietly find their way into feed, water or pastures. Understanding where they come from and how to prevent exposure is a key part of protecting your herd. Foreign materials and toxins often slip in through everyday farm activities such as repairing fences, running equipment, feeding hay or dealing with weather-stressed crops. A small piece of wire, leftover net wrap or contaminated feed source might not seem like much, but if consumed by cattle, it can trigger health issues, lost performance or even death. Understanding Hardware Disease When cattle consume sharp metal objects like nails or pieces

Farmers Balance Costs and Technology Investments - Tractor Sales Down

Tractor sales fell across most categories in February, but strong combine demand highlights farmers’ continued investment in productivity boosting technology.

Crude Oil and Natural Gas Outlook - What Farmers Need to Know in 2026–2027

Brent crude prices surge as Middle East conflict disrupts supply. See the 2026–2027 outlook for oil, natural gas, and electricity—and what it means for U.S. agriculture

Principal field crop areas, 2026

Canadian farmers expect to plant more canola, barley, soybeans and corn for grain in 2026, while they anticipate area seeded to wheat, oats, lentils and dry peas to decrease compared with the previous year. Wheat At the national level, farmers anticipate planting 26.7 million acres of wheat in 2026, down 1.1% from the previous year. If this anticipation is realized, national wheat area would remain well above the five-year average, despite a decrease from 2025, which would likely be attributable to continued strong global demand. Producers expect spring wheat area to edge down 0.1% to 18.8 million acres in 2026. They anticipate durum wheat area to decrease 2.4% to 6.4 million acres, while they expect winter wheat area to fall 6.7% to 1.6 million acres. Farmers in Saskatchewan anticipate planting 13.9 million acres of wheat in 2026, down 1.0% from the previous year. Producers expect spring wheat area to fall 0.6% to 8.7 million acres, while they anticipate durum wheat area to remain

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service