Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

Potash: BHP or PCS - Which is the best deal for farmers? Farmers of North America Comment...What do you think?
 
Potash:  BHP or PCS - Which is the best deal for farmers.
 
Commentary from FNA-STAG
 
The coverage of the offer by BHP Billiton to buy potash mining giant Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan (PCS) has been missing one very important element - the potential impact on agricultural producers.  This important stakeholder is, after all, the end consumer of the important fertilizer product.
 
There has been full and complete analysis and speculation of the impact of the deal for shareholders, governments, and citizens of Saskatoon and Saskatchewan.  These are all important stakeholders to be sure, but the potential impact of the takeover on the farmer who uses that potash seems to have been left out of the mix. 
 
Bob Friesen, CEO of FNA-STAG, comments, "Have either of these companies talked about their farm customers yet?  What effect would this deal have on farmers?  Fertilizer costs are one of the biggest expenses for most farmers, but there hasn't been any talk about retail pricing and the impact it has on farmers' ability to grow the crops that feed the world".
 
Farmers are in a bad position compared to the fertilizer companies who set prices based on what they think they can extract from farmers for crop nutrients.  Add to that the small handful of potash companies out there, and you have a situation where the farmer has no choice but to pay the price that's given.
 
In June, 2008, according to a Bloomberg report, potash jumped to $650 a metric ton from $190 a year earlier.  This was in response to rising grain prices, including corn and soybeans, two major crops that use potash.  Friesen points out, "When a farmer finally catches a break and the price of grain goes up, the fertilizer companies go right after that margin by increasing the price of fertilizer." 
 
Friesen continues, "When the price of grain went up in 2008, there was a perceived food shortage and farmgate prices were blamed for some people having to go hungry.  Yet there were reports of some farmers around the world not producing because they could not afford to buy the requisite fertilizer".
 
FNA-STAG questions which company would be the best for farmers.  PCS's history of managing production to increase the price may be good for shareholders, but it has a negative impact on the price for farmers and the price of food.  It seems unlikely that they would change this monopolistic behavior.  As the potential new owner, would BHP continue the same price strategy that is used by PCS, or would they increase production and sell higher volumes?  This important question has so far not been addressed.
 
FNA-STAG also urges the Governments of Saskatchewan and Canada to consider their farm constituents and use whatever tools they have to ensure the interests of farmers and input costs are considered.  FNA-STAG's number one priority is farmer profitability and believes profitable farms are just as important to the economy as mining companies.
 
As the debate about the future of these two companies goes on, FNA-STAG would like to ask both PCS and BHP:  Do either PCS or BHP care about the impact that fertilizer prices have on farmers and what are you planning to do about it?
 

Views: 102

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Bristow on October 7, 2010 at 11:59am
As you can see by the response no one cares. You know that the price is going to go up who ever buys it. And I bet ten to one the Saskatchewan and Canadian governments will buy shares with your tax money to get the lions share out of the higher prices you will be paying, after the deal is done.

▶ Reply to Discussion

RSS

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

NOAA Declares El Nino, Raising Key Weather Risks for Agriculture

NOAA has officially declared El Nino, and the resulting changes in weather patterns could significantly affect crop production across the United States and Canada in the coming months.

Federal Judge Sends Roundup Class Settlement Back to Missouri State Court, Clearing Path for Approval

A federal judge has ruled that the high-profile Roundup class settlement case must return to Missouri state court, a move expected to accelerate approval of a multibillion-dollar agreement covering tens of thousands of claims.

Hursh: A downward shift in fertilizer prices

War in the Middle East and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz contributed to a rapid rise in nitrogen fertilizer values, but prices have dropped dramatically in recent weeks. Some analysts were worried that the normal price reset after spring seeding would not occur this year, but a price drop has happened quickly: There have been reports of international prices for urea, 46-0-0 moving lower, but what matters to farmers is the price locally. Up until a few weeks ago, the price of urea at farm input suppliers in Western Canada was around $1,250 a tonne. According to the Alberta Farm Input Price Survey, the lowest urea price of the past five years was just over $600 a tonne back in July of 2021. However, by April of 2022, world events had pushed urea prices to $1,350 a tonne. While prices this spring were not quite that high, they were onerous as compared to the price of grain. So where are prices right now? What would you need to pay for urea for summer or fall delivery? You cou

Soy Canada annual meeting highlights industry collaboration and future direction

Soy Canada’s 2026 annual meeting highlighted the power of collaboration across the soybean value chain and the opportunities ahead for Canada’s soybean industry. Discussions at the event focussed on strengthening market relationships, improving competitiveness and preparing for the future through a renewed strategic vision. The organization’s annual meeting was held June 18, 2026, in Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ont. The event brought together industry leaders from across Canada to review progress over the past year and discuss future priorities for the organization. The 2025-2026 Annual Report highlights progress made in the past year. Brian Innes, Soy Canada Executive Director, shared key accomplishments from the past year, including strengthening relationships with international customers and improving collaboration across the soy value chain. Noted highlights included advancing discussions on soybean protein variability as part of the third Northern Soybean Summit and expanding participa

Two Nunavut communities strengthen access to traditional foods with new processing facilities

The Government of Canada is investing over $4.7 million on two community-led traditional food processing facilities that will help Gjoa Haven and Taloyoak residents access more local foods and strengthen food sovereignty in the region. The Government of Canada is taking action to address local food accessibility and high prices in Nunavut. That means advancing reconciliation with Inuit by investing in food systems to strengthen community infrastructure, reduce dependance on imported foods, and lower costs for Nunavummiut. Today, the Honourable Rebecca Chartrand, Minister of Northern and Arctic Affairs and Minister responsible for CanNor, announced a federal contribution of more than $4.7 million to create country food processing facilities in Gjoa Haven and Taloyoak. This includes $3,389,736 in funding from CanNor, $831,550 from Fisheries and Oceans Canada and $566,038 from Crown-Indigenous Relations and Indigenous Services Canada. The Gjoa Haven Country Food Processing Facility and

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service