Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

Time to Give Notice.

A significant number of Canadian cattle producers have been asking the federal government for compensation for damages resulting from the CFIA's gross incompetence in handling and preventing the BSE debacle.

Now, as I learn more about the government's plans to implement traceability, it appears to me that this is the perfect opportunity to give them notice that we will not co-operate with them unless our request for justice is first satisfactorily addressed.

Does it not seem hypocritical to the extreme that the CFIA wants to implement and impose traceability on the very producers whose livelihoods they destroyed through their own lack of due diligence?

Since when is bureaucracy exempt from accountability?

If you or I as a producer would mess up as badly as the CFIA did in the instance of the BSE situation, we would be bankrupted by the cost of defending ourselves.

Yet, the ones who so drastically mishandled the Mad Cow situation got off Scot free and are still ensconced in their comfortable offices wrting whimsical new dictates for those who are in the field actually producing a tangible good.

In order to protect and promote our interests, I call on all agricultural producers to immediately boycott all ONTRACE workshops until the government realizes and acknowledges its responsibility to the very people it supposedly serves.

Tell the organizers why this action is necessary. The government is NOT above being held responsible for its actions and ommissions.

This is the time and the place to let them know that.


Views: 347

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Bristow on October 7, 2010 at 11:48am
John I am sorry you won't get them, because slim that leaks from the pipe, ends up seeping back into the ground. As with public servants. They are protected from prosution as are the politians, while acting in the public interest.

Now if you were to get names of indivuals that could be proven to damage your property under commonlaw not UCC law which the government uses to protect these pieces of slime. Then you have a chance. but then you have to find a government judge to hear the case, under commonlaw jurstiction.

▶ Reply to Discussion

RSS

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Tariffs In Key Markets Underscore Urgent Need For Action

Today, Pulse Canada released the following statement in response to India’s decision to impose a 30% tariff on pea imports. “While Canada’s pea export program to India got off to a good start this fall, the recently announced tariff will challenge future sales, and the impact will be felt across the industry. “Canada’s pulse industry needs progress from the federal government on removing tariffs that threaten our competitiveness and damage our global reputation. While the government may not be able to influence domestic policies in other markets, we do expect it to resolve issues within its control. “The Government of China has been clear that its 100% tariff on Canadian peas is a retaliatory measure and will require a negotiated solution. We are hopeful that meetings this week will mark a timely and important step toward a resolution that allows Canadian peas back into the Chinese market. “Canadian growers and exporters have worked for decades to build trusted relationships with c

SARM’s Huber wants Western concerns heard in Ottawa

The head of the Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities is wanting to see Western concerns addressed by the federal government. “We've been neglected for 10-plus years in western Canada, and Saskatchewan is in western Canada,” said Bill Huber, SARM president, to reporters following his morning address at the mid-term meetings in Regina. “And we've got an agriculture industry here that's struggling right now with tariffs and trade, and our farmers are really suffering because of the non-movement of grain, especially canola seed, to China. We've got one of our biggest trading partners just across the 49th parallel that we do have to do business with [the USA]. They're the closest and one of our largest trading partners. And we need to see those goods, livestock, beef, cattle, pigs, pork, those things continue to cross that border. So we need those exports.” Huber said it was also "disappointing to see that there's a $112 million decrease over the next year in agriculture spen

APAS expresses mixed feelings on Tuesday's federal budget

The President of the Agricultural Producers Association of Saskatchewan (APAS) has mixed feelings about Tuesday's federal budget. Bill Prybylski, who farms in the Willowbrook area, was pleased to see that agriculture was actually mentioned in the budget. He says there were some positives in the budget, like investment in infrastructure, the reinstatement of the accelerated capital cost allowance, and red tape reduction. Prybylski was also pleased to see the permanent reversal of the Capital Gains tax increase. But he says the announced changes to AgriStability won't make a difference to most producers, dealing with canola, pea and pork tariffs. Prybylski notes budget details are still quite sparse, so there's more work to be done in studying the document. He's also worried about possible budget cuts to Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, which could affect agriculture research.

Ag in the 2025 federal budget

The House is expected to vote on the budget on Nov. 17

Statement from FVGC President, Marcus Janzen

The Fruit and Vegetable Growers of Canada (FVGC) President, Marcus Janzen, wishes to announce that Massimo Bergamini will begin a transition from his role as Executive Director as he moves toward retirement. The Board is grateful for his leadership and for the organizational achievements made during his tenure.

© 2025   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service