Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

Found this very interesting post on the Canadian Agri-Food blog, managed by the Agri-Food Unit at the Ivey School of Business.

Written by Brandon Schaufele - with the article available at - http://www.canadianagrifood.ca/?p=374

" Today’s edition of the London Free Press had this article on the front page. The story, titled “Execs live high on hog”, admonishes Farm Credit Canada (FCC), its executives in particular, for what it calls a “lavish” employee rewards program.

Several things bother me about this story. I’ll discuss four.

First, the article implies that the executives of FCC are overcompensated because they are employed by a publicly owned firm. It always baffles me that people don’t understand the opportunity costs of public servants. Civil servants, at least those in management and policy positions, are very highly educated and at the top of their fields. More often than not, these individuals could earn much higher wages in the private sector. Instead they accept non-pecuniary rewards – such as interesting work or location of employment – which motivates them to remain in their current position. All Canadians benefit from this. As that opportunity cost grows however, it becomes more challenging to attract the same highly qualified workers. Quite simply, they must forego too much money to work for the public sector.

This logic applies to executives at FCC in particular. FCC is essentially a specialized bank. Qualified bank executives do not have problems finding alternative employment. Still you never know. Maybe FCC’s executives over-compensated. Let’s do a comparison to see how FCC stacks up against a comparable private sector institution, Canadian Western Bank (data are from the annual reports).


Employees...
FCC-1400
Cdn Western - 1400


Offices...
FCC-100
Cdn Western-50


Total assets...
FCC-$17,098 million
Cdn Western-$11,636 million

Revenues...

FCC-$508 million
Cdn Western-$328 million

ROE...
FCC-11.2%
Cdn Western-13.2%


CEO compensation...
FCC-$273,000-$313,010
Cdn Western-$2,461,647 ($550,000 base salary)


Exec VP comp...
FCC-$204,660-$220,735
Cdn Western-$666,568-$786,886 ($247,400-$292,875 base salary)


I think that these numbers highlight the underlying issue. Let’s say that a talented executive VP at FCC was headhunted by Canadian Western Bank. Do you think that they’d stay in Regina? Neither do I.


Next, the article refers to “ailing farmers” more than three times. This sentence is a particular gem:

Farm Credit Canada’s travel and hospitality expenses reveals spending many Canadian farmers can only dream about.


Two points. First, similar to many other Canadians, I can only dream about doing these things. I don’t know why farmers get singled out. Of course, maybe it should be mentioned that neither of us (the farmers nor me) are executives at a bank. My second point is what really irritates me about this argument. Farmers are rich. Farmers are much wealthier than the average Canadians (look at the figures in this post if want proof). Farmers choose not to allocate money towards travel and hospitality. It’s not that they can’t afford them.

Moreover, many of the policies aimed at farm income are social policy (they do not correct market failures). Agricultural lobbyists should be cautious that they don’t attract too much attention to these programs. If the general population starts scrutinizing agricultural funding, farmers will not enjoy the results.


Third, the article quotes Canada’s Auditor General Sheila Fraser:

“Farm Credit Canada should review its award program against a formal, reputation-risk policy to ensure that all awards are in keeping with positive public perceptions and the desired image/reputation of FCC as a Crown corporation.”


If the infamous Sheila Fraser doesn’t call a news conference proclaiming that these employee reward programs are excessive, then these programs are not excessive. Case closed. It might be bad PR, but these programs are likely good for business and employee morale.


Fourth, my favourite paragraph in the article is this:

In March 2009, Farm Credit Canada president Greg Stewart and his wife boarded a plane to Disney World for five expense-paid days . . . Their children remained home in Regina.

Who goes to Disney World and leaves their children at home?


Here’s my conclusion. Canadians want a highly skilled public service. We do not want fraudulent expenses or excessively compensated executives. However, it is important to remember that public servants have opportunity costs. If downward pressure on wages and other forms of compensation continues, the civil service will get hollowed out with less skilled workers remaining. This will be to the detriment of the country.

Based on the information in this article, FCC’s compensation and reward packages seem very reasonable. The media should stop feigning outrage. (It is interesting to note that the total travel and hospitality expenses of the top 8 executives equaled less than 0.25% of net income, a figure so small that it doesn’t even factor into rounding.)"

Do you agree with Brandon's view?
I agree with parts of it, at least around the idea of rewarding good employees and maintaining employee morale. It's an important part of business. Compare 508 million dollars in REVENUE, with an average of 300K/year in special trips. That doesn't seem excessive at all.

Are users of other banks upset their fees are going to pay for a customer service rep to take a holiday? No (And it happens in other banks too)
How about the box seats that the company I bought my car from has in a number of big sports venues across the US? No

Just because it's a crown corporation - doesn't mean they are wasting money.

Time to move on to bigger issues.

Views: 582

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

AAFC improves outlook for canola

The price outlook for canola continues to improve, according to the Outlook for Principal Field Crops report from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, released Wednesday. The average price expected for canola in this current crop year was raised by $20 a tonne, while the price projection on canola for the upcoming crop year was raised by $30 a tonne. This is on top of a $60 per tonne increase in April’s new crop price projection. The average new crop price is now expected to be $25 a tonne higher than the average price for the current crop year. The other big price changes this month were on mustard and Canary seed. Ag Canada believes mustard acreage is down by half as compared to last year and the expected drop in production has resulted in a $55 a tonne increase in the projected new crop price as compared to April. Meanwhile, the new crop price projection on Canary seed has been reduced by $45 a tonne.

Farmers Getting Less as Consumers Pay More for Food

Consumers may be paying more, but farmers’ share of the food price pie continued to shrink in 2024, according to a new study from the Agricultural Producers Association of Saskatchewan (APAS). APAS on Thursday released its third annual Farmers and Food Prices report, which tracks seven key grocery products derived from Saskatchewan commodities. It showed farmers earned less than a year earlier for all products, except for retail pork. For example, the farm share of the price for a 2.5 kg bag of flour eroded to 17% in 2024, down from 19.2% in 2023 and 25% in 2022, while the farm share for 1 loaf of bread dropped to just 4% from 4.9% and 6.2% the previous two years. The farm share for canola oil (3 litres) eased to 30% in 2024, compared to 30.7% in 2023 and 41.6% in 2022. Margerine (907 g) saw the biggest year-over-year fall, with the farm share falling 3 points from 2023 to 11%. Farmers’ share of lentil prices (900 g) amounted to 21% last year, down from 21.5% in 2023, and the s

Enhancing Alberta’s veterinary diagnostic capacity

Alberta is famously a livestock province, renowned for producing some of the world’s best meat. Livestock is also a significant driver of Alberta’s economy, with livestock market receipts totalling almost $12 billion in 2024. For this essential industry to keep growing and thriving, it needs quick, affordable diagnostics and robust disease preparedness. Beginning with Budget 2025, Alberta’s government is providing the University of Calgary Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (UCVM) with a total of $9.5 million over three years to continue operating a full-service veterinary diagnostic laboratory. “For almost 30 years, Alberta livestock producers and veterinarians had to send diagnostic samples to Saskatchewan or other provinces to get results. This funding will ensure they can get results much quicker, allowing for faster responses to potential animal health-related threats. In uncertain times, this ensures the safety and wellbeing of our livestock sector and reassures international marke

What We’re Missing About Youth and Lawn Equipment Safety

Experts urge rural families to delay youth lawn equipment use until children are physically and mentally ready, as new resources aim to prevent serious injuries.

ATTN Researchers: BCRC Proof of Concept and Clinical Trial Call for Proposals OPEN

The Beef Cattle Research Council invites proposals for proof-of-concept projects and clinical trials. The application deadline for this call is July 21, 2025, at 11:59 PM MT.   With increased investment in research through the Canadian Beef Cattle Check-Off, the BCRC has committed to provide research funding in two key areas that have previously had limited funding:   Proof of Concept – proposals to help inform whether a concept is worth pursuing as a larger, more defined funding request  Clinical Trials – proposals to validate practices or technologies that have been discovered through research projects and/or to facilitate the adaptation of technologies utilized in other sectors, commodities or countries  The BCRC has committed funding to short-term projects in these two areas, with a maximum of $50,000 per project regardless of duration. Project duration should be between six months to one year, unless a clear rationale can be provided demonstrating the need for a longer timeframe

© 2025   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service