Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

Finding value in carbon footprints and environmental labelling

Synthesis Agri-Food Insights
February, 2010

Finding value in carbon footprints and environmental labelling

The Vancouver 2010 Olympics have been touted as the most "green" games ever; in fact, they are the first Olympic Games ever to actively develop a carbon management program to reduce and offset its emissions. This includes using "clean" hydroelectric power, clustering event venues to lessen travel, re-using heat energy from ice refrigeration to heat other buildings and collecting rainwater.

In Sweden , a fast-food chain has added environmental labeling to its food products. Max Burger is displaying the carbon footprint of all of the food items on its menu, a move that is reported to be going over well with consumers in the environmentally-conscious Scandinavian nation.

This growing desire for "greening" our lifestyles can present opportunities for the agri-food industry and its time to take advantage of those possibilities, says Rob Hannam, President of Synthesis Agri-Food Consulting.

"Consumers are increasingly starting to care about sustainability and although it may require a bit of a shift in thinking on the part of our sector, I definitely see this as a trend that is going to keep growing," says Hannam. "Our planet is a non-renewable resource and we all have a role to play in nurturing and protecting it."

A recent Farm Credit Canada report looks at green economics - integrating environmental considerations and consumer needs into business models - and different ways agriculture and agri-business can find value in going green.

It is important, according to the report, to put a value to green initiatives for your business by re-thinking inputs (water, energy, feedstocks/ingredients), operations (design, marketing, transportation) and outputs (products, services, emissions, packaging, waste).

Water, for example, is one of the most-used resources in agri-food and as droughts and water shortages are increasingly starting to pose problems, recycling and conservation is becoming a necessity.

Biomass - like re-using food or farm waste products or growing plants like miscanthus specifically for energy- can be an alternate source of energy. Transportation opportunities for improvement include local supply chains or environmentally friendly options like hybrid vehicles.

New technologies are being invented constantly with a view to lessening environmental impacts, and green chemistry - replacing harmful substances used in manufacturing processes with ones derived from renewable resources - is providing alternatives in plastics, crop protection and pharmaceuticals.

But despite the many possibilities and opportunities, Hannam has a caution for anyone seeking to build and promote a business on environmental labeling.

"Consumers are becoming skeptical of empty promises of environmental friendliness," he says. "If you're going to make claims of environmental responsibility, you better be able to back them up if you want your brand and your reputation to stand for something and to be valued by your customers."

Insights - so what does this mean?

It's a growing trend - Consumers are starting to look for eco-friendly alternatives in many aspects of their daily lives as their environmental awareness increases. Being a leader in this area and telling the world about it can help attract and keep customers.

Adopt a green approach - Going green may require a change in the way we look at our farm and food businesses. Some changes will be obvious, like re-using waste products or recycling water, because they save or make money. Other changes may require up-front investment so we need to re-think how we do business. Organizations should embrace "green" or "sustainability" as a part of their culture similar to the way a manufacturing operation embraces safety as a part of their culture.

It's the right thing to do - Transitioning to greener practices may mean incurring additional upfront costs and while that investment does not come with a guarantee of increased profitability, it is the right thing to do. Being environmentally conscious is part of our larger societal responsibility to ourselves and future generations.

Sincerely,

The Synthesis Agri-Food Consulting Team

Synthesis Agri-Food Consulting

"Our Passion is Problem Solving"

Views: 60

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Guinness World Record attempt to take place in St. Albert on Aug. 22

?ST. ALBERT – If you have ever wanted to witness an attempt at a Guinness World Record, then you will want to be in St. Albert, Ontario on August 22 when an attempt will be made to set a record for the most plow blades pulled simultaneously.

Why Alignment Matters: Domestic Check-Off and the Import Levy

When Canadian beef producers sell cattle, they contribute to the national beef check-off. That investment supports work that benefits the broader Canadian beef industry, including market development, consumer demand, public and stakeholder engagement, and research. When beef or beef cattle are imported into Canada, an import levy is also collected. While the structure is not identical in every detail, the principle behind it is straightforward: beef marketed in Canada should help contribute to the programs that support beef demand in Canada. The national check-off paid by producers and the import levy paid on eligible imports are two parts of a broader investment approach. Together, they help ensure that both domestic beef production and imported beef products are connected to the market development work that strengthens beef’s position with Canadian consumers. For producers, the domestic cattle check-off is collected at the point of sale and includes both national and provincial po

I’ve noticed a lot of wild oat escapes in some of my fields this year; what can I do to prevent it from getting worse next year?

Despite our best efforts, sometimes even the best laid weed control plans go wrong! The first thing to remember is that not all weed escapes are created equal. In some cases, weeds can survive because of application timing issues, challenging weather conditions or late flushes that emerge after spraying. However, when weeds aren’t controlled by herbicide applications, herbicide resistance should also be on your radar. A recent survey in Manitoba found that in fields with uncontrolled wild oats, 100 per cent of populations were resistant to Group 1 products, 82 per cent were resistant to Group 2 products, and 82 per cent were resistant to both Group 1 and 2 herbicides. Those numbers show how important it is to take a closer look at wild oat weed escapes. Identifying why your herbicide failed to control wild oats is the first step toward finding a solution. Start by scouting the field to narrow down the cause. Consider factors such as application timing, weather conditions, late flush

Is fungicide actually effective on Sclerotinia head rot in sunflower?

This is one of the most difficult questions to answer because there are many things to consider. I also don’t want to be outright negative because we do still have options for sclerotinia management in sunflowers. However, management is the operative word. First of all, sclerotinia head rot infections have an interesting pathway. Spores use dead sunflower florets, plus pollen, as the base to infect a sunflower plant. The spores grow into the receptacle, infecting and decaying the entire head after a period of time. Sclerotinia wilt (basal stalk rot) and mid-stalk rot are also infected by the same sclerotinia species, but it will be via the mycelia that grow from the sclerotia bodies in the soil for basal stalk rot. Mid-stalk rot is also infected by ascospores, but this can be earlier in the season than head rot or at the same time. So, management of sclerotinia does not start at flowering. Crop rotation is the most obvious management tool that we are familiar with in sunflowers, but

Using Water More Efficiently in Beef Packing Plants

Packing plants use a time-tested approach to clean their facilities. The first step uses high-pressure hot water to remove fat and meat scraps from equipment, floors and walls. Next, surfaces are cleaned using detergent. Finally, sanitizers are used to further reduce bacterial numbers. Processing companies want to reduce water use as part of their environmental goals and to reduce energy bills. High-pressure water and steam can produce aerosols that capture bacteria and spread them throughout the plant. They can then settle on and cross-contaminate clean surfaces long after the cleaning has been completed, which complicates efforts to effectively clean facilities. Biofilms are another problem. Biofilms are colonies of bacteria surrounded by a protective layer that firmly attaches them to surfaces and shelters the bacteria from hot water, detergents and sanitizers. Biofilms are hard to remove and are commonly found in hard-to-reach places. These researchers investigated potential cro

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service