Future of Dairy Farming = Efficiency

Dairy farmers can sometimes get a bad reputation. Because of supply management, I'd agree that some farms can hang on longer than they would if they were open to the free market. The free market can be very good and eliminating the least efficient very quickly. Unfortunately - it can also eliminate some good farmers who just get mixed up in a market they can't control (just ask a hog farmer).

However - I think those least efficient dairy farmers are going to have to make improvements quickly or face some tough choices. In the recent dairy management school I took part in (if you missed me talking about that - click here), we got a chance to talk policy and economics with George McNaughton of the Dairy Farmers of Ontario. Right now, they are looking at having to make price reductions because a number of products are about to flood the market thanks to a low world dairy price and high Canadian dollar. Essentially what that means is that a combination of price and currency means processors in Canada can pay for the product as well as the import tariff, and get it cheaper than they can buy from local producers. (As a side note - can you guess which country poses the biggest threat? It is not the US. It is New Zealand) That means dairy farmers have only two choices. Sell at the cheaper price in order to compete, or dump the milk. It's not hard to figure out which one is more viable.

This isn't the first time dairy farmers have had to sell their milk for a lower price than what was set by the Canadian Dairy Commission, however it has only lasted a few weeks before the loonie cooled off, or world prices started to rise. However, talking with economists has me feeling that lower dairy prices could be sticking around longer than normal. Just take a look at TD's latest dollar outlook. It is pegging the loonie to sit between 1.02 and 1.05 for the next year.

I'm supportive of what the DFO is doing - even though they really don't have much of a choice here. All we as farmers can do is make sure the cows are milking as well as they can, and we make sure expenses are as low as they can be.

And how knows, maybe a lower price will result in a bit more demand - and a bit more quota for farmers to fill.

Do you agree? Or maybe have a different opinion on this altogether? Let me know in the comment section.

< Previous Post

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Comment by Wayne Black on May 22, 2010 at 4:58am: A lower price may not increase demand significantly. But it will eliminate many inefficient producers. It also would lower the price of certain 'barriers to entry' (land & quota costs). This may encourage beginning farmers or smaller producers back into the dairy sector - not for the money but for the love of taking care of the livestock. On the flip side, it may encourage remaining producers to get larger to gain better 'economies of scale'. A 1000 hd herd would become more common.

RSS

Welcome to
Ontario Agriculture

Sign Up
or Sign In

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

2025-2026 Year in Review Showcases Impacts of Beef Producer Investments

What have your investments in the Canadian Beef Cattle Check-Off accomplished for the industry lately? The Beef Cattle Research Council’s 2025–2026 Year in Review highlights how producer investments and input are advancing research, addressing industry priorities and delivering practical value back to Canada’s beef producers. “The BCRC continues to enhance coordination across the broader beef system, bringing researchers and industry groups together so we can make the best use of limited resources and move solutions and benefits to producers more quickly,” said BCRC Executive Director Tracy Herbert. “The BCRC’s collaborative approach is essential as we address complex challenges and position the Canadian beef industry for long-term success.” The 2025-2026 BCRC Year in Review provides a broad funding overview by program area and source. In the past fiscal year, the BCRC received on average $0.66 (unaudited) of every $2.50 of the Canadian Beef Cattle Check-Off collected by provincial

Pre-harvest products and how to use them

Canola growers have three primary reasons for a pre-harvest spray application: Weed control ???????Desiccation Manage uneven crop ??????????????Use scenarios for pre-harvest spray Weed control Pre-harvest can be a good time to manage weeds, especially when straight combining. The act of swathing and curing can also provide weed control. Effective control is challenging on big weeds: apply product at the recommended rate with high water volumes to penetrate the crop canopy and achieve thorough coverage. Note: Set reasonable expectations on preventing seed set. Charles Geddes, weed management scientist with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada in Lethbridge, Alberta, says: “There is no easy way to tell if weeds will have mature seed, but in my experience, it happens earlier than one might think. I suggest that the latest a weed should be left is until it is flowering. Once it starts to flower, then some of the seed can mature on the plant after it is terminated. From a weed management p

Pre-harvest glyphosate staging tips help produce market-ready crops

As harvest approaches, Keep it Clean is reminding Canadian canola, cereal and pulse growers to follow proper staging practices for pre-harvest glyphosate application to help protect crop marketability and preserve access to domestic and export markets. Applying pre-harvest glyphosate for weed control too early can result in unacceptable product residues in harvested grain. Keep it Clean’s Pre-Harvest Glyphosate Staging Guide provides visual examples to help growers identify when grain moisture content in canola, cereals and pulses is less than 30 per cent – the only stage at which pre-harvest glyphosate may be applied. Where allowed, glyphosate is registered for pre-harvest weed control and is not to be used as a desiccant. Pre-harvest glyphosate may only be applied when grain moisture content is less than 30 per cent in the least mature part of the field, including any areas of regrowth that may produce seed. “Glyphosate is an important tool in the grower’s toolbox for crop manage

Safeguarding Cereals Against Allergens

Maintaining a reputation for clean, safe grain is essential for both domestic and international markets. Shipments contaminated with allergenic grains can lead to costly rejections, recalls and long-term damage to market confidence. Unintentional mingling of allergenic grains with cereals is a concern for export markets and must be actively managed. Certain crop types can be allergen sources in our export markets. When these crops are unintentionally mixed with cereals, they can pose serious food safety and market access risks. Common allergen sources in grain exports include: Mustard Soy Buckwheat Buckwheat is considered highly allergenic, and even very small amounts mixed into wheat, barley or oats can cause severe reactions in some markets. Because of these risks, many export markets apply strict limits for allergenic material in cereal shipments. How allergens can contaminate grain Allergen contamination most often occurs through shared equipment and handling system

Canada Launches First Private Forest Owner Survey in Over 20 Years, Farmers Invited to Participate

Canadian farmers who own woodlots or private forests are being asked to participate in the first national survey of private forest owners in more than 20 years.

More…

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service