Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

Dairy farmers can sometimes get a bad reputation. Because of supply management, I'd agree that some farms can hang on longer than they would if they were open to the free market. The free market can be very good and eliminating the least efficient very quickly. Unfortunately - it can also eliminate some good farmers who just get mixed up in a market they can't control (just ask a hog farmer).

However - I think those least efficient dairy farmers are going to have to make improvements quickly or face some tough choices. In the recent dairy management school I took part in (if you missed me talking about that - click here), we got a chance to talk policy and economics with George McNaughton of the Dairy Farmers of Ontario. Right now, they are looking at having to make price reductions because a number of products are about to flood the market thanks to a low world dairy price and high Canadian dollar. Essentially what that means is that a combination of price and currency means processors in Canada can pay for the product as well as the import tariff, and get it cheaper than they can buy from local producers. (As a side note - can you guess which country poses the biggest threat? It is not the US. It is New Zealand) That means dairy farmers have only two choices. Sell at the cheaper price in order to compete, or dump the milk. It's not hard to figure out which one is more viable.

This isn't the first time dairy farmers have had to sell their milk for a lower price than what was set by the Canadian Dairy Commission, however it has only lasted a few weeks before the loonie cooled off, or world prices started to rise. However, talking with economists has me feeling that lower dairy prices could be sticking around longer than normal. Just take a look at TD's latest dollar outlook. It is pegging the loonie to sit between 1.02 and 1.05 for the next year.

I'm supportive of what the DFO is doing - even though they really don't have much of a choice here. All we as farmers can do is make sure the cows are milking as well as they can, and we make sure expenses are as low as they can be.

And how knows, maybe a lower price will result in a bit more demand - and a bit more quota for farmers to fill.

Do you agree? Or maybe have a different opinion on this altogether? Let me know in the comment section.

Views: 329

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Comment by Wayne Black on May 22, 2010 at 4:58am
A lower price may not increase demand significantly. But it will eliminate many inefficient producers. It also would lower the price of certain 'barriers to entry' (land & quota costs). This may encourage beginning farmers or smaller producers back into the dairy sector - not for the money but for the love of taking care of the livestock. On the flip side, it may encourage remaining producers to get larger to gain better 'economies of scale'. A 1000 hd herd would become more common.

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

‘It’s another blow’: Farmers deal with surging fertilizer prices ahead of seeding

Fertilizer is an essential part of Kevin Peters’ farm in southwestern Manitoba. But since Israel and the U.S. attacked Iran, the average price of urea fertilizer, which is widely used around the world, has skyrocketed, surging around 30 per cent over the last week. Peters says the interruption in supply didn’t come as a huge surprise to him. “We deal with geopolitical issues all the time with markets, be it pork, be it grain, and now fertilizer,” he said. “There’s always some disruption seeming to happen somewhere in the world that is changing our daily prices.” Peters says he pre-purchased his fertilizer for this farming season back in the fall but is concerned about prices later this year when he has to buy fertilizer again. “We’ll see what the market looks like in eight months,” he said. Like Peters, Andrew James also pre-bought his fertilizer in the fall for his farm in Anola, Man., and he says he is happy he did. “My fertilizer bill for that (at the time) was around $350,00

From a Piece of Wire to Contaminated Feed: Preventing Foreign Material Hazards in Beef Cattle Operations

Foreign material and toxin consumption by beef cattle can lead to significant health problems, reduced performance and economic losses. Canadian cattle producers take great pride and care in how they manage their farms and ranches, from providing proper nutrition to stewarding their land and ensuring excellent animal care. Yet even with the best intentions, foreign materials and toxins can quietly find their way into feed, water or pastures. Understanding where they come from and how to prevent exposure is a key part of protecting your herd. Foreign materials and toxins often slip in through everyday farm activities such as repairing fences, running equipment, feeding hay or dealing with weather-stressed crops. A small piece of wire, leftover net wrap or contaminated feed source might not seem like much, but if consumed by cattle, it can trigger health issues, lost performance or even death. Understanding Hardware Disease When cattle consume sharp metal objects like nails or pieces

Farmers Balance Costs and Technology Investments - Tractor Sales Down

Tractor sales fell across most categories in February, but strong combine demand highlights farmers’ continued investment in productivity boosting technology.

Crude Oil and Natural Gas Outlook - What Farmers Need to Know in 2026–2027

Brent crude prices surge as Middle East conflict disrupts supply. See the 2026–2027 outlook for oil, natural gas, and electricity—and what it means for U.S. agriculture

Principal field crop areas, 2026

Canadian farmers expect to plant more canola, barley, soybeans and corn for grain in 2026, while they anticipate area seeded to wheat, oats, lentils and dry peas to decrease compared with the previous year. Wheat At the national level, farmers anticipate planting 26.7 million acres of wheat in 2026, down 1.1% from the previous year. If this anticipation is realized, national wheat area would remain well above the five-year average, despite a decrease from 2025, which would likely be attributable to continued strong global demand. Producers expect spring wheat area to edge down 0.1% to 18.8 million acres in 2026. They anticipate durum wheat area to decrease 2.4% to 6.4 million acres, while they expect winter wheat area to fall 6.7% to 1.6 million acres. Farmers in Saskatchewan anticipate planting 13.9 million acres of wheat in 2026, down 1.0% from the previous year. Producers expect spring wheat area to fall 0.6% to 8.7 million acres, while they anticipate durum wheat area to remain

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service