Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

Implement steering keeps pulled implements on the right track

                       

It's all very well setting up virtual guidelines for a tractor's visual guidance or automatic steering system to follow, but what if the implement being used doesn't run true?

After all, a large part of the justification for GPS autosteer is its ability to maximise implement output by minimising overlaps and allowing accurate work to continue at night. With ultra-accurate 1 INCH (±2cm) RTK system accuracy measured in the INCH/low centimetres, equipment that runs off-centre creates a headache.

"Once you've got a highly accurate RTK guidance system on the tractor, you come to realise how poorly a lot of implements follow, even on flat ground," says Paul Smith, Precision Expert at Northern Equipment Solutions.

Speaking at a precision farming workshop that helped growers adopt a "controlled traffic" approach to field operations, Mr Smith cited difficulties keeping equipment on track when preparing land for cash crops and potatoes.

With the latter, auto-steering achieves tight bed spacing but if things go out of true the tractor's front wheels can end up running over a row trying to compensate.

It is suggested to adopt GPS Steering to solve these issues and identify two common causes of implement misalignment.

For most growers, this problem relates to gravity pulling an implement downhill as it works across a slope.  This can be corrected using 'passive' implement steering, where you have a receiver on the implement to help control the tractor's steering, or by attaching a Protrakker system that steers the implement at the hitching point to the tractor, when the implement does not have the option of “active” implement steering, implements that come equipped with steering can be steered actively.

Among the systems commercially available are Trimble's TrueGuide and the John Deere iGuide system, both of which provide "passive" steering correction to keep heavy cultivation and seeding implements on track as they traverse hills and hollows.  Systems commercially available for active systems are Trimble’s TrueTracker and The John Deere iSteer Systems, both of which control the implements steering system to place the implement in the correct position at all times.  Implements looking for the increased accuracy of active style steering can provide steering by directing the tongue of the implement to correct the position.

GPS-steered or Giro Operated ProTRAKKER by MBR

In passive guided systems, these add-ons use the existing terminal of the tractor's auto-steering system with a receiver mounted on the implement. Extra software calculates the steering inputs needed to offset the tractor uphill so that the implement follows the correct path to neatly butt up to the previous pass, with the overlap pre-set by the operator and no gaps.  Whereas active systems steer the implement independently of the tractor, much like having 2 independent GPS systems.

It's a step beyond the implement compensation feature that most auto-steering systems now have and which take into account the way a trailed implement cuts corners. They work by calculating the implement's path from the position of the drawbar pivot and working elements - such as the coulters on a drill - relative to the receiver to cause the tractor to steer a little wider through a curve than it would otherwise.

With TrueGuide and iGuide, the receiver on the implement provides the main guide reference, with RTK signal correction giving ±1”/±2cm accuracy. The tractor then compensates for implement crabbing on slopes, as well as accurately compensating through curves based on the actual path of the implement.

Suppliers say the technology brings to undulating and hilly ground all the benefits of accurate bout matching and tramline positioning that are easily achieved on level fields.

However, the 'passive' steering approach may not be enough for a wide implement that tends to pull to one side or the other inconsistently. The level of consistent accuracy will not be enough in situations where you want the implement to consistently follow a very precise path.

This level of implement control accuracy has other potential uses. Such as strip tilling and placement of slurry and/or fertiliser along crop rows before they are sown - an approach that lends itself to a controlled traffic situation using the same wheel paths year after year.

WHAT EQUIPMENT IS OUT THERE?

Trimble

Trimble says its AgGPS TrueTracker package is designed to handle a number of different implement steering solutions, including on-the-move hydraulic drawbar adjustment, steerable implement support wheels and rudder discs, as well as side-shift and yaw adjustment on mounted equipment.  Trimble’s Trueguide package is designed to use calculations from a implement mounted controller to guide the tractor to correct the path of the implement.

As well as the implement-mounted antenna, the system includes the NavController II controller with terrain correction to compensate for the antenna's offset position caused when the implement is working across a significant incline.

John Deere

John Deere says its Starfire GPS iSteer  package is designed to handle a number of different implement steering solutions as well, including on-the-move hydraulic drawbar adjustment, steerable implement support wheels and rudder type discs, as well as side-shift and yaw adjustment on mounted equipment.  John Deere’s iGuide package is designed to use calculations from a implement mounted controller to guide the tractor to correct the path of the implement.

As well as the implement-mounted antenna, the system includes the iSteer controller to compensate for the antenna's offset position caused when the implement is working across a significant incline.

Protrakker

MBR maker of the Protrakker says its tongue guidance package is designed to control non-controllable implement types including pull type sprayers, tillage and cultivators, any type of planting equipment and veggie harvester .  MBR’s Protrakker can be controlled with MBR Giro based controller, or with either Trimble’s TrueTracker or John Deere’s iSteer.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paul Smith is the owner of Northern Equipment Solutions and based in Central Ontario, Canada. Providing Quality Potato Equipment, Precision Agriculture and Other Advanced Equipment, Northern Equipment Solutions ensures that your profits and yields are maximized. www.northernequipment.ca or sales@northernequipment.ca

Views: 818

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Ag in the House: Dec. 1 – 5

A Liberal minister reminded the House the carbon tax doesn’t apply to farmer

Ontario Animal Health Network (OAHN) Swine Network Quarterly Industry Report

Starting in 2015, Senecavirus A (SVA) has caused intermittent complications with respect to the export of Canadian cull animals to the United States. This disease resembles reportable swine vesicular diseases. This is a national issue and since June 2025 has impacted Ontario cull sow movements. In July 2025, the APHIS and the USDA removed the export eligibility status for a cull sow assembly in Ontario due to SVA lesions being seen in cull sows sent to a USDA processing facility. These lesions initiated foreign animal disease investigations at this US processing plant. The suspect animal(s) were initially quarantined for individual inspection and further testing. Since the initial site, another 2 Ontario cull sow assembly sites have also had their export eligibility status revoked by APHIS and the USDA for similar reasons. The affected assembly sites accept cull sows from Quebec, the Maritimes and Ontario. Each affected assembly site must action the USDA requirements including emptyin

New restrictions placed on hunting, farming 'incredibly destructive' wild boars in Alberta

Wild boars have been declared "a pest in all circumstances" by the Alberta government effective Dec. 1, meaning new restrictions have been placed on keeping them in captivity and hunting them in the wild. It is now illegal to keep, buy, sell, obtain or transport wild boars in Alberta without a permit. That also means no new wild boar farms will be permitted in the province. The hunting and trapping of wild boars in Alberta is banned as well, with the exception of land owners or occupants killing the animals on their own land. Any person who kills a wild boar is now required to report the date, location and number of boars killed to the province as soon as possible. Hannah McKenzie, the province's wild boar specialist, says the changes were made due to the dangers posed by existing wild boar populations and the risks associated with more escaping from captivity. "In addition to damaging agriculture and the environment, wild boar pose a serious risk for the introduction and spread of

CUSMA Review Raises Concerns Over Potential U.S. Tariffs on Canadian Pork

As the first formal review of the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) approaches in July, pork producers across North America are bracing for potential impacts—especially the possibility of new U.S. tariffs on Canadian agriculture. Florian Possberg, Partner at Polar Pork Farms, says the U.S. political landscape is shaping expectations. He notes that U.S. President Donald Trump has repeatedly pushed for a baseline 15% tariff on foreign goods in recent global trade discussions. If that approach carries into the CUSMA renegotiation, it could disrupt one of the pork sector’s most critical trade corridors. Free Trade Has Been Essential for Pork Movement Possberg emphasizes that under CUSMA, both live hogs and processed pork products have flowed freely across borders without tariffs. This freedom is especially important given the highly integrated nature of North America’s pork supply chain. The best-case scenario, he adds, is that tariff-free access continues unchanged. The wor

FCC report highlights productivity as key to Canada’s agricultural future

Canadian farmers could see significant income gains and new opportunities if agricultural productivity growth returns to historic highs. The Farm Credit Canada (FCC) report titled Reigniting agricultural productivity in Canada, estimates that boosting productivity growth to two per cent annually could unlock $30 billion in additional farm income, generate $31 billion in GDP, and create nearly 23,000 jobs across the country. Canada has long been a standout among global food producers. Over the past half-century, the agriculture industry has achieved significant productivity growth through better farm management, improved input efficiency and technological innovation. The report warns, however, that productivity growth has slowed in recent years, threatening the industry’s competitiveness and Canada’s ability to meet growing national and global food demand. “Canada’s agricultural productivity growth has consistently outpaced other G7 countries for more than three decades, showing the s

© 2025   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service