Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

We’ve all been bamboozled by false claims of one kind or another. Terms like “Real”, “Natural”, “Approved” – even “Free” don’t always hold true when you take a closer look under the covers. Well, now you can add “Local” to the growing list of trendy yet questionable marketing terms.

It appears that marketers drank the Kool-Aid and are cashing in on the social trend to shop, eat, buy and support local and there’s nothing wrong with that, provided that the goods or services promoted live up to their local claims. But how do you really know that bunch of broccoli really is local? More often than not, the consumer is left with the job of discerning the fake from the authenticate as seen in this tongue-in-cheek skit from the show Portlandia.

No group is more baffled by the misuse and overuse of the term local than our local food producers. Perhaps I’m more tuned in lately but it seems like every conversation we have with local producers or chefs lands on the topic of “local washing”. It is a source of growing frustration amongst this group of professionals.

In a post that appeared on Grist, there’s a series of great examples of local washing including a recent marketing campaign that Hellmann’s ran in the Canadian market. In this do-as-we-say-not-as-we-do campaign, they asked us to take a close look at how far our food travels – just not their mayo. Hellmann’s is a subsidiary of the U.S. based giant Unilever. Furthermore, if you’ve ever taken the time to read the ingredients list on a jar of their mayonnaise you will note that there is absolutely nothing local about the product.

Hellmann’s Eat Local Campaign Ad

As public awareness around the benefits of eating local grows so will the demand for locally grown and grazed foods. Many reputable retailers and restaurants go to incredible lengths to source products and ingredients from their own communities. However, their dubious counterparts bypass local producers, just not the local message. They see the consumer’s appetite for fresh and local only as a marketing opportunity, too good to pass up. They use misleading, sometimes false claims about the geographic origin of their suppliers winning over even the most savvy customers.

To my knowledge, a false claim of locality in advertising has not been successfully challenged under the provisions of the Competitions Act which addresses deceptive marketing practises (if I am wrong, please correct me) but the growing nature of the problem would indicate it is only a matter of time.

To combat the local washing problem and bring more transparency to the local food supply, programs like MyPick in Ontario and some initiatives undertaken by our regional food associations do verify the authenticity of local growers and/or sellers but without an aggressive public education campaign and widespread adoption from all the stakeholders in the local food ecosystem, consumers will continue to take a leap of faith when purchasing products that carry a claim of local.

This issue of transparency is one that our platform, ei•ei•eat, is tackling head on in the first version of our app scheduled for release in August 2014. We give businesses with a stake in local food – producers, markets, restaurants and retailers – the ability to connect with each other and display these connections so buyers using our app can verify first-hand that the honey they just purchased at a farmer’s market really did come from a local producer and the steak that they want to order once grazed 10 minutes up the road.

And we didn’t stop there. The application provides food producers with an easy way to imbed product codes on their labels so buyers can verify a product’s origin by scanning it with their smartphone. We also feel it is imperative to support existing verification and certification programs so growers, restaurants, etc. that have taken the steps to meet certain standards and practises may promote this within their ei•ei•eat profile.

A trip to your local farmer’s market should be a gratifying experience, not a crap shoot. The key to combatting local washing is quite simple. Let the market correct itself by giving consumers accessible, accurate information about their local food supply so they can connect the dots between producer and seller, distinguish real from fake and assert their buying power where it belongs – with businesses that leverage truth not tactics to market their products.

Views: 745

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Alberta Beef Producers hosts Producer Town Hall on Traceability

Alberta Beef Producers (ABP) hosted a Producer Town Hall on Traceability on March 2, ahead of its Annual General Meeting, bringing together industry representatives and cattle producers to share perspectives on one of the most pressing issues currently facing the beef sector.  “Traceability has become one of the most talked-about issues in the Canadian beef industry in recent weeks,” says Doug Roxburgh, Chair of ABP.  “ABP is in a listening phase and is committed to hearing directly from Alberta cattle producers and representing their best interests as discussions move forward. The purpose of this Town Hall was to provide additional time and space for producers to share their perspectives, which will help inform ABP’s approach on this issue.”  Alberta cattle producers were invited to attend in person or virtually. The event took place at the Sheraton Cavalier Calgary and was broadcast live to online registrants via Direct Livestock Marketing Systems (DLMS).  The event began with op

Alberta Beef Producers objects to proposed traceability changes; announces intent to form traceability working group 

Following extensive producer engagement, including 15 Producer Meetings and a dedicated Town Hall, ABP delegates passed a resolution at the 2026 Annual General Meeting directing the creation of a traceability working group. ABP, alongside governments and other cattle organizations, will work to address deficiencies and producer confidence in the current model before further changes can be considered. Effective disease readiness and trade access require a traceability system that works in practice, not just in policy. It must be supported by proven technology, reflect the realities of cattle production, and limit undue costs or administrative burden. Without that foundation, the system will not achieve full producer participation and will?not work as intended.??? The?proposed amendments to Part XV of the?Health of Animals Regulations?(Identification and Traceability), as advanced by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), create significant challenges for beef producers and ABP

Farmer Funding to Drive Innovation and Strengthen Canola Production under Canola Agronomic Research Program in 2026

The three Prairie provincial canola grower associations have evaluated and selected 11 canola research projects to receive funding under the Canola Agronomic Research Program (CARP) in 2026. This investment includes over $2.4 million from Alberta Canola, SaskOilseeds and Manitoba Canola Growers, as well as over $495,000 from the Western Grains Research Foundation (WGRF) and over $1 million from Results Driven Agriculture Research (RDAR), bringing the total investment to $4 million. Driven by grower associations and supported by a robust, collaborative research priority development and proposal review system, CARP enables the funding of projects that are key to advancing canola productivity and mitigating production threats. The funded projects regularly provide new strategies for managing pests and diseases, addressing emerging threats such as weeds and viral infections, and supporting a more resilient canola crop. Grower associations are pleased to collaborate with the RDAR and WGRF,

University of Saskatchewan finalists named for McCall MacBain Scholarship

Established with a $200-million gift in 2019, the McCall MacBain Scholarships are Canada’s largest leadership-based scholarships for master’s and professional studies. More than 700 Canadians applied, and 151 advanced to a first round of interviews in November. The top 53 Canadians will attend the final round of interviews in Montreal, joined by 38 finalists from other countries. “It is inspiring to make it this far. I’m thankful to know that my hard work in and out of university has led me to this point, and I have to credit the people who have helped me along the way,” said Zentner. “I feel a little bit lucky, and blessed beyond measure.” Zentner is a graduate of the College of Kinesiology. He is the executive director of the Kinesiology Association of Saskatchewan, leading efforts to advance the field of kinesiology across the province. He was promoted to executive director after first volunteering with the association for a year. “More than anything, university taught me to beli

New Sprott Awards support Indigenous graduate students

The new Sprott awards recognize resilience, leadership and academic potential for Indigenous graduate students studying at the College of Agriculture and Bioresources (AgBio) at the University of Saskatchewan (USask). These financial awards help remove barriers to success for Indigenous students. The Sprott Indigenous Graduate Scholar Award is awarded to a new student entering a thesis-based graduate program. It is a renewable award valued at $25,000/year for a MSc student and $30,000/year for a PhD student. This year’s recipients are Taya Fedorchuk and Kim Lebel. The Sprott Indigenous Graduate Achievement Award is valued at $5,000 and is awarded to a current student in a thesis-based graduate program. This year’s recipients are Bella Amyotte, Jolynn Amyotte, Morgan Fleming and Jeremy Irvine. The award recipients’ graduate research showcases the innovation and range of research in AgBio! Taya Fedorchuk Research project: Growing horticulture crops in northern climates in hydroponic gr

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service