Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

We’ve all been bamboozled by false claims of one kind or another. Terms like “Real”, “Natural”, “Approved” – even “Free” don’t always hold true when you take a closer look under the covers. Well, now you can add “Local” to the growing list of trendy yet questionable marketing terms.

It appears that marketers drank the Kool-Aid and are cashing in on the social trend to shop, eat, buy and support local and there’s nothing wrong with that, provided that the goods or services promoted live up to their local claims. But how do you really know that bunch of broccoli really is local? More often than not, the consumer is left with the job of discerning the fake from the authenticate as seen in this tongue-in-cheek skit from the show Portlandia.

No group is more baffled by the misuse and overuse of the term local than our local food producers. Perhaps I’m more tuned in lately but it seems like every conversation we have with local producers or chefs lands on the topic of “local washing”. It is a source of growing frustration amongst this group of professionals.

In a post that appeared on Grist, there’s a series of great examples of local washing including a recent marketing campaign that Hellmann’s ran in the Canadian market. In this do-as-we-say-not-as-we-do campaign, they asked us to take a close look at how far our food travels – just not their mayo. Hellmann’s is a subsidiary of the U.S. based giant Unilever. Furthermore, if you’ve ever taken the time to read the ingredients list on a jar of their mayonnaise you will note that there is absolutely nothing local about the product.

Hellmann’s Eat Local Campaign Ad

As public awareness around the benefits of eating local grows so will the demand for locally grown and grazed foods. Many reputable retailers and restaurants go to incredible lengths to source products and ingredients from their own communities. However, their dubious counterparts bypass local producers, just not the local message. They see the consumer’s appetite for fresh and local only as a marketing opportunity, too good to pass up. They use misleading, sometimes false claims about the geographic origin of their suppliers winning over even the most savvy customers.

To my knowledge, a false claim of locality in advertising has not been successfully challenged under the provisions of the Competitions Act which addresses deceptive marketing practises (if I am wrong, please correct me) but the growing nature of the problem would indicate it is only a matter of time.

To combat the local washing problem and bring more transparency to the local food supply, programs like MyPick in Ontario and some initiatives undertaken by our regional food associations do verify the authenticity of local growers and/or sellers but without an aggressive public education campaign and widespread adoption from all the stakeholders in the local food ecosystem, consumers will continue to take a leap of faith when purchasing products that carry a claim of local.

This issue of transparency is one that our platform, ei•ei•eat, is tackling head on in the first version of our app scheduled for release in August 2014. We give businesses with a stake in local food – producers, markets, restaurants and retailers – the ability to connect with each other and display these connections so buyers using our app can verify first-hand that the honey they just purchased at a farmer’s market really did come from a local producer and the steak that they want to order once grazed 10 minutes up the road.

And we didn’t stop there. The application provides food producers with an easy way to imbed product codes on their labels so buyers can verify a product’s origin by scanning it with their smartphone. We also feel it is imperative to support existing verification and certification programs so growers, restaurants, etc. that have taken the steps to meet certain standards and practises may promote this within their ei•ei•eat profile.

A trip to your local farmer’s market should be a gratifying experience, not a crap shoot. The key to combatting local washing is quite simple. Let the market correct itself by giving consumers accessible, accurate information about their local food supply so they can connect the dots between producer and seller, distinguish real from fake and assert their buying power where it belongs – with businesses that leverage truth not tactics to market their products.

Views: 750

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

I’m switching my wheat variety; do I need to change my seeding rate?

The short answer is yes; you will most likely need to change your seeding rate, but this is not just because you are planting a different wheat variety. Rather, seeding rates should be adjusted annually to reflect seed source characteristics (germination, thousand kernel weight [TKW]) and the environment the seed is being planted into, to ensure you can achieve your target plant population.   Let’s dig into why this is. For spring wheat, provincial target plant population recommendations are between 23-28 pl/ft2, with many producers targeting the upper end of this recommendation. Achieving your target plant stands sets your crops up for success, as crop uniformity is improved, weed pressure is combatted and resources are optimized.  Seeding rates should be calculated to achieve your target plant stand, which means accounting for germination percentage, expected mortality and, importantly, your TKW. TKW changes year-to-year and from variety to variety. Let’s consider an example to ill

How much 10-34-0 can be applied with my corn seed?

Oddly, I have had this conversation more this winter/spring than ever before. On paper, there is a finite answer. Anecdotally, there are a few different options and it is all dependent on soil type and soil conditions, moisture, etc. First of all, side-banding any type of fertilizer is much safer than placing it with the seed. Some fertilizers are safe in certain quantities with the seed, but very few. Side-banding is much safer and provides quick access to the roots. Midrow banding is the safest method, but roots take that much longer to access the fertilizer row, which negates the “starter” effect. The other factor that indicates the level of safety is soil moisture; the drier the soil, the more risky it is to place any fertilizer with or near the seed. I’m guilty of thinking that fertilizer toxicity to the seed is mainly due to the nitrogen content and a result of ammonia burn. Salt injury is actually more common and affects germination and early season growth, so applying fertili

AGT Food and Ingredients Inc. Announces Date for Q1 2026 Results and Conference Call

AGT Food and Ingredients Inc. (TSX: AGTF) ("AGT" or the "Company") announces the release of its Q1 2026 results on May 12, 2026 after market close and has scheduled a conference call at 8:30 a.m. Eastern time on May 13, 2026. To join the conference, please dial 1-833-821-0163 (toll free from Canada & the U.S.) or +1-647-846-7232 (from outside Canada & the U.S.). An audio replay of the conference call will be available on AGT's website after the call by visiting www.agtfoods.com. The financial statements and notes thereto for the three months ended March 31, 2026, as well as the related management's discussion and analysis will be filed on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.com and will also be available on the AGT website at www.agtfoods.com prior to the conference call. About AGT AGT is a globally diversified food company that produces high-quality, nutritious products for everyday consumption. Our products reach consumers in 127 countries, and our global footprint consists of 39 state-of-the

Rising Waters on the Canadian Prairies and Beyond

With flooding affecting several Canadian provinces, farmers are being urged to act quickly to protect crops, animals, infrastructure, and long-term soil health.

Is Your Bull Ready? A Year-Round Approach to Bull Management

Every cow-calf producer has either lived it or knows someone who has. Breeding season wraps up and everything looks fine, until fall preg-checks tell a different story: open cows, late calvers and a breeding window that slipped wider than planned. While cow nutrition, body condition and management are frequently evaluated, one critical factor is often underestimated—the bull. Most frustrating is that there are often no obvious warning signs during breeding. The bull was turned out, was covering cows and looked the part. On the surface, everything appeared normal. That’s exactly why a bull breeding soundness evaluation (BBSE) matters more than many producers realize. It is one of the few opportunities to take some guesswork out of bull performance. On a cow-calf operation, bulls get a lot of attention for a couple of months out of the year and very little once breeding season wraps up. The reality is that a bull’s value doesn’t start on turnout day, and it definitely doesn’t end when

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service