Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

We’ve all been bamboozled by false claims of one kind or another. Terms like “Real”, “Natural”, “Approved” – even “Free” don’t always hold true when you take a closer look under the covers. Well, now you can add “Local” to the growing list of trendy yet questionable marketing terms.

It appears that marketers drank the Kool-Aid and are cashing in on the social trend to shop, eat, buy and support local and there’s nothing wrong with that, provided that the goods or services promoted live up to their local claims. But how do you really know that bunch of broccoli really is local? More often than not, the consumer is left with the job of discerning the fake from the authenticate as seen in this tongue-in-cheek skit from the show Portlandia.

No group is more baffled by the misuse and overuse of the term local than our local food producers. Perhaps I’m more tuned in lately but it seems like every conversation we have with local producers or chefs lands on the topic of “local washing”. It is a source of growing frustration amongst this group of professionals.

In a post that appeared on Grist, there’s a series of great examples of local washing including a recent marketing campaign that Hellmann’s ran in the Canadian market. In this do-as-we-say-not-as-we-do campaign, they asked us to take a close look at how far our food travels – just not their mayo. Hellmann’s is a subsidiary of the U.S. based giant Unilever. Furthermore, if you’ve ever taken the time to read the ingredients list on a jar of their mayonnaise you will note that there is absolutely nothing local about the product.

Hellmann’s Eat Local Campaign Ad

As public awareness around the benefits of eating local grows so will the demand for locally grown and grazed foods. Many reputable retailers and restaurants go to incredible lengths to source products and ingredients from their own communities. However, their dubious counterparts bypass local producers, just not the local message. They see the consumer’s appetite for fresh and local only as a marketing opportunity, too good to pass up. They use misleading, sometimes false claims about the geographic origin of their suppliers winning over even the most savvy customers.

To my knowledge, a false claim of locality in advertising has not been successfully challenged under the provisions of the Competitions Act which addresses deceptive marketing practises (if I am wrong, please correct me) but the growing nature of the problem would indicate it is only a matter of time.

To combat the local washing problem and bring more transparency to the local food supply, programs like MyPick in Ontario and some initiatives undertaken by our regional food associations do verify the authenticity of local growers and/or sellers but without an aggressive public education campaign and widespread adoption from all the stakeholders in the local food ecosystem, consumers will continue to take a leap of faith when purchasing products that carry a claim of local.

This issue of transparency is one that our platform, ei•ei•eat, is tackling head on in the first version of our app scheduled for release in August 2014. We give businesses with a stake in local food – producers, markets, restaurants and retailers – the ability to connect with each other and display these connections so buyers using our app can verify first-hand that the honey they just purchased at a farmer’s market really did come from a local producer and the steak that they want to order once grazed 10 minutes up the road.

And we didn’t stop there. The application provides food producers with an easy way to imbed product codes on their labels so buyers can verify a product’s origin by scanning it with their smartphone. We also feel it is imperative to support existing verification and certification programs so growers, restaurants, etc. that have taken the steps to meet certain standards and practises may promote this within their ei•ei•eat profile.

A trip to your local farmer’s market should be a gratifying experience, not a crap shoot. The key to combatting local washing is quite simple. Let the market correct itself by giving consumers accessible, accurate information about their local food supply so they can connect the dots between producer and seller, distinguish real from fake and assert their buying power where it belongs – with businesses that leverage truth not tactics to market their products.

Views: 761

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Meat Institute Pushes Back on Trump Processing Plan

President Trump has announced plans to allow farmers and ranchers to process their own meat as part of an effort to address concerns about concentration in the meatpacking sector.

AgriStability Deadline Extended to Oct. 1 for Alberta Producers

Alberta producers affected by excessive moisture this growing season have more time to enrol in AgriStability, while those already eligible for interim payments will be able to access a larger share of their estimated benefit sooner. According to the Agriculture Financial Services Corporation (AFSC), the Alberta and federal governments have opened late participation in the 2026 AgriStability program until Oct. 1 in response to wet conditions that have affected many farms since the original April 30 enrolment deadline. The interim payment rate for 2026 has also been increased to 75% of the estimated final AgriStability payment, up from 50%. AFSC said the change is intended to improve cash flow for producers facing financial pressure during a difficult growing season. AFSC CEO Darryl Kay said record moisture levels have left some producers unable to access fields or complete essential farm work, creating significant uncertainty and financial stress. “AgriStability is designed to

Map: August Weather Drier for Much of Western Canada

Western Canada saw a sharply uneven precipitation pattern over the 30 days ending Wednesday, with the driest conditions concentrated across Saskatchewan and parts of southern Alberta and Manitoba. As can be seen on the map below, large portions of southern and central Saskatchewan received less than 40% of normal precipitation during the period, with another broad area receiving just 40% to 60%. Much of southern Manitoba was also drier than normal, although some pockets received above-average rainfall. Alberta precipitation was variable. The pattern reflects a growing season finish that has been considerably drier across parts of the Prairies, particularly Saskatchewan, following wetter conditions earlier in the summer. In Saskatchewan, the lack of late-season rainfall likely accelerated crop maturation and helped fields dry down as harvest approached, although it may also have limited final yield potential for later-developing crops in the driest areas. In Alberta, comparatively

Saskatchewan Harvest Still Lagging Average Pace

The Saskatchewan harvest accelerated this past week but remains behind the previous year and well back of average. Thursday's weekly crop report showed the provincewide harvest at 11% complete as of Monday. That compares to 4% a week earlier, and the five- and 10-year averages of 25% and 21%. Last year at this time, 12% of the crop was in the bin. Harvest progress varied widely by region. The Southwest was furthest along at 27% complete, followed by the Southeast at 11% and West-central region at 8%. East-central Saskatchewan was 5% harvested, while the Northeast and Northwest were each just 1% complete. Warm daytime temperatures and cooler evenings helped crops mature across much of the province, while generally dry conditions supported fieldwork. However, rainfall, strong winds and periods of high humidity slowed operations in some areas. Later-seeded crops are now beginning to turn, with harvesting expected to expand soon, the report added.. Producers continued to focus o

Sclerotinia Fungicide Sensitivity Survey

Manitoba Canola Growers along with SaskOilseeds, Alberta Canola, Canola Council of Canada and Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) are currently funding research projects that evaluate sclerotinia for sensitivity to fungicides with different modes of action. Sclerotinia with levels of insensitivity and immunity to common modes of action, have already been identified in Manitoba through this project. With favorable conditions across the province in 2026 we need samples from across the province to understand how widespread this problem is and provide farmers with recommendations for fungicide stewardship and efficacy. You will receive fungicide test results from the samples you have submitted. Combined results with samples from across Manitoba and the other provinces will be shared publicly at the RM level. All other field information will be handled confidentially. Sampling and Submission Instructions From a single canola field collect 1-10 sclerotia from infected stems at crop ma

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service