Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

My OMAFRA troubles and my advice to avoid them

Its never nice to hear of someone facing problems, but its useful to take advantage of the opportunity to avoid them yourself.  My opinion of OMAFRA is greatly tainted, but I am open minded enough to realize most problems could have been avoided.  

At issue is the loss of the farm tax rebate which holds municipal tax rates to, well, basically the equivalent of where they alway were.  Without the rebate, taxes quadruple.  As it stands today, my issue is only with the 2012 tax year.  So how did this happen? Well I bought a farm in 2011, my first farm.  To qualify for the tax rebate, you must have a valid FBR number (Farm Business Registration).  In previous years I didn't have an FBR number, I didn't have any land and the number serves no purpose otherwise.  I was able to farm without this, as my father had an exemption to the requirement for religious reasons applied to the farm land.  That sets the stage.

My first mistake - rather than apply for an exemption, i decided its not worth the effort, i will just conform to the system. Unfortunately, this came after September 30, which is the last day you can apply for a 2011 FBR number.  So although I contacted Agricorp in 2011, i was told i had to wait until Jan 3 to apply, which I did.  And with a bit of hassle to prove my  2011 farm activities grossed over $7,000, I was granted a 2012 FBR number.

Well, the 2012 tax rate rebate is based on the 2011 FBR number.  So when I asked OMAFRA to grant me a startup exemption, which would allow the 2012 tax rate to qualify without the prior FBR, it was denied.  Why? I sold too much grain in 2010, it was over $7,000.  I should have applied for an FBR in 2010, even though I didn't own any land.  So my families help by allowing me to ease into farming caused an issue that would not rear its head for several years.  But it could have been avoided had I applied for an exemption (and been granted) or got an FBR number.  

Now that OMAFRA will not recognize me as a startup, they can not change the tax qualification.  So they send me off to the ARB (Assessment Review Board) to file an appeal.  Its amazing that no such appeal exists in OMAFRA, if you don't like what they say, you must go through another government agency.  

In my first conversations with the ARB, I was instructed to send a letter to the chair for reconsideration.  Which was promptly denied and I was told to talk to OMAFRA.  Yea, thats where I just came from.  

So OMAFRA sends me back to the ARB, this time with a better explanation as to the process I need to follow.

So at this point, I must submit an appeal, which is not free of charge, to get this resolved, if they will even resolve it.

My advice to the new farmer in Ontario, get the FBR before you buy any land or at the very least the start up exemption.  By waiting until after, your path is littered with deadlines and forms and costs you don't need.

In defence of the people on the other end of the phone, they have all been polite and tried to help, several did note I shouldn't need to go through all this, but thats just the way it is sometimes.  

I farm because I am a farmer, I just can't stand that the government has to be so involved in this. But they have the upper hand.  All I can hope is it works out in the end.

Views: 549

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Farming Forward in Watford scheduled for Dec. 1

The event will provide farmers with information about farm transition and funding opportunities

Canada and China extend Preliminary Joint Agreement until 2028

The extension means continued tariff-free access for canola meal

Manitoba Dealer AgWest Seeks Lifeline

One of Manitoba's largest equipment dealership networks has been given a temporary lifeline to stay in business while it seeks new financing, pursues a sale or develops a restructuring plan, as the Manitoba Court of King's Bench granted protection from creditors. AgWest Ltd. could be heading toward liquidation as the company was unable to meet payroll obligations in the middle of harvest season, according to a document filed by the company's bank, the Bank of Montreal. AgWest serves farmers at six dealerships in Manitoba at Elie, Morden, Brandon, Neepawa, Russell and Benito, as well as two locations in Saskatchewan at Weyburn and Yorkton. AgWest Ltd. has defaulted on more than $34 million in loans, according to an opening brief in a restructuring proceeding under Canada's Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act. "Since 2026, the AgWest entities have experienced significant financial difficulties, including liquidity challenges and a general inability to meet their obligations as they

Deere Plans 2 Iowa Plant Closures

John Deere announced plans to close two Iowa manufacturing plants in the next few years and move production to other cities, in a news release from the company on Wednesday. Deere said it will be closing its plant in Ottumwa, Iowa, after moving windrower and round-baler production to Des Moines. In addition, the company said it will end manufacturing at its Hagie plant in Clarion, Iowa, after moving STS sprayer production to Louisiana. Windrower production plans to move to Des Moines by the end of 2027 and round balers would follow by the end of 2028, according to Deere, followed by the closure of the plant in Ottumwa. Hagie STS sprayer production is slated to move to Thibodaux, Louisiana, beginning in 2028 with manufacturing ending in Clarion, Iowa, by the end of 2029. John Deere did not provide employment numbers or say how many jobs would be affected, although other media outlets on Wednesday reported the company has about 700 workers at the Ottumwa plant. The number of employee

Diesel Fuel Waivers Bring Engine Compatibility Concerns and Tax Rule Questions

Responding to the surge in diesel fuel prices, federal and state lawmakers introduced temporary measures intended to provide economic relief. These actions raise questions about fuel use requirements and fuel taxation. “Temporary relief measures may help reduce operating costs, but diesel users should not assume that all diesel fuels are interchangeable,” said Allen Schaeffer, executive director of the Engine Technology Forum. “Understanding which fuel is appropriate for a particular engine and complying with tax and regulatory requirements can help avoid equipment damage, unnecessary maintenance costs, warranty concerns, and compliance issues.” Texas and Alaska get ULSD exemptions Ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD) is the standard diesel fuel used for both on-highway and off-highway applications throughout the United States, and it is regulated to a maximum sulfur content of 15 parts per million (ppm). On Oct 5, Texas was granted a waiver to supply diesel fuel with up to 500 ppm of sul

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service