Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

My OMAFRA troubles and my advice to avoid them

Its never nice to hear of someone facing problems, but its useful to take advantage of the opportunity to avoid them yourself.  My opinion of OMAFRA is greatly tainted, but I am open minded enough to realize most problems could have been avoided.  

At issue is the loss of the farm tax rebate which holds municipal tax rates to, well, basically the equivalent of where they alway were.  Without the rebate, taxes quadruple.  As it stands today, my issue is only with the 2012 tax year.  So how did this happen? Well I bought a farm in 2011, my first farm.  To qualify for the tax rebate, you must have a valid FBR number (Farm Business Registration).  In previous years I didn't have an FBR number, I didn't have any land and the number serves no purpose otherwise.  I was able to farm without this, as my father had an exemption to the requirement for religious reasons applied to the farm land.  That sets the stage.

My first mistake - rather than apply for an exemption, i decided its not worth the effort, i will just conform to the system. Unfortunately, this came after September 30, which is the last day you can apply for a 2011 FBR number.  So although I contacted Agricorp in 2011, i was told i had to wait until Jan 3 to apply, which I did.  And with a bit of hassle to prove my  2011 farm activities grossed over $7,000, I was granted a 2012 FBR number.

Well, the 2012 tax rate rebate is based on the 2011 FBR number.  So when I asked OMAFRA to grant me a startup exemption, which would allow the 2012 tax rate to qualify without the prior FBR, it was denied.  Why? I sold too much grain in 2010, it was over $7,000.  I should have applied for an FBR in 2010, even though I didn't own any land.  So my families help by allowing me to ease into farming caused an issue that would not rear its head for several years.  But it could have been avoided had I applied for an exemption (and been granted) or got an FBR number.  

Now that OMAFRA will not recognize me as a startup, they can not change the tax qualification.  So they send me off to the ARB (Assessment Review Board) to file an appeal.  Its amazing that no such appeal exists in OMAFRA, if you don't like what they say, you must go through another government agency.  

In my first conversations with the ARB, I was instructed to send a letter to the chair for reconsideration.  Which was promptly denied and I was told to talk to OMAFRA.  Yea, thats where I just came from.  

So OMAFRA sends me back to the ARB, this time with a better explanation as to the process I need to follow.

So at this point, I must submit an appeal, which is not free of charge, to get this resolved, if they will even resolve it.

My advice to the new farmer in Ontario, get the FBR before you buy any land or at the very least the start up exemption.  By waiting until after, your path is littered with deadlines and forms and costs you don't need.

In defence of the people on the other end of the phone, they have all been polite and tried to help, several did note I shouldn't need to go through all this, but thats just the way it is sometimes.  

I farm because I am a farmer, I just can't stand that the government has to be so involved in this. But they have the upper hand.  All I can hope is it works out in the end.

Views: 549

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Farm tractor struts its stuff on F1 track

A Valtra T236 reached 54 mph at the Red Bull Ring in Austria

Diploid Potato Breeding May Improve Yield and Storage

AAFC researchers have found that diploid potatoes offer improved genetics, high yields, and disease resistance, providing a resilient alternative for Canadian potato growers.

Boosting soybean protein: The essential role of zinc and sulfur in sustainable crop production

Soybean is a critical element of the global food supply: Between its use for animal feed and human consumption, it accounts for roughly two-thirds of plant-based protein meal output world-wide. Canada is a global leader in sustainable soybean production, with 70% of its crop, one of the country’s top three by value, exported annually. According to Brazilian scientist Gabriel Montanha, soy production has “exploded” in recent decades to meet demand – but there hasn’t been a corresponding increase in soybean’s protein content. “To ensure soy remains a sustainable crop, we need to increase the protein content of soy seeds,”  says Montanha, who is doing a postdoctoral fellowship at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) in Grenoble, France. “It's critical we find ways want to generate more protein without increasing the amount of land we’re currently cultivating.” Montanha and colleagues used the Canadian Light Source (CLS) at the University of Saskatchewan (USask), and Brazil

New insights into lung health risk for female farmers

Exposure to a mix of common airborne agricultural contaminants could lead to lung effects in females, a new University of Saskatchewan (USask) study has uncovered. Farmers are exposed daily to a variety of potential contaminants such as endotoxins (substances associated with certain bacteria) in dust, which are well-known to trigger lung inflammation and asthma. However, how endotoxins specifically impact women’s health is not well understood, particularly when there is also exposure to a herbicide called glyphosate, widely used in agricultural work. Now, USask researchers have detected lung effects in female mice models just five days after a combined exposure, simulating the same quantity of endotoxins and herbicide farmers could breathe over a work week. The team was able to take detailed images of the affected lungs thanks to the powerful X-rays of the Canadian Light Source (CLS) at USask. These images showed that fluid had built up in the lungs during this short exposure perio

Wet harvest? Protect Stored Cereals from OTA

Wet harvest conditions across parts of the Prairies have put added focus on how cereal grain is managed in storage. Cool, wet weather has slowed harvest progress in some areas, with reports of tough cereals and grain quality concerns. For growers bringing grain off at higher moisture levels, careful drying, cooling and monitoring will be especially important this fall. Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a mycotoxin that can develop in stored cereal grain when moisture and temperature conditions are favourable for fungal growth. Unlike deoxynivalenol (DON), which develops in the field as a result of Fusarium infection, OTA develops during storage. Grain stored above safe moisture levels, condensation or water entering the bin, contaminated dust or soil, and residues from previously stored grain can all contribute to OTA development. Even a small pocket of damp grain can create problems. That means managing the entire grain mass, not just relying on an average moisture reading. Make Storage Manage

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service