Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

The CFFO Commentary: Future of Farming requires Accommodating Differing Views

By Jenny Denhartog

September 3, 2010

The steady decline in the number of family farms in Ontario has been well recognized and publicized. Census numbers indicate that, between 1996 and 2006, Ontario lost more than 10,000 census farms. With the average age of Ontario’s farmers now approaching 60 years, planning the future for Ontario’s farm sector should be top priority.

Within the agricultural sector there are differing views on what the future of farming should look like. As always, individual’s opinions often depend on their own situation. For example, those whose farming income represents just a portion of their total income will often favour smaller, less intensive farms, while those whose sole income depends on the farm business will argue that only bigger, more intensive farms are viable. The possibility of a son or daughter joining the farm business tends to influence one’s perspective as well. So does level of debt, commodity and method of marketing. With all those differing viewpoints, discussions on the topic of long term sustainability of farming can turn into a never-ending exchange of opinions, all of them valid and many of them contradicting each other.

Over the years, these differing farming philosophies have resulted in a very diverse primary production sector. On the one hand, this diversity should be seen as one of Ontario agriculture’s main strengths as it enables our farmers to cater to a diverse consumer base. But as is so often the case, this strength is also a major weakness. Fostering the diversity comes with a multitude of complications when it comes to provincial farm policy development.

Four years ago the Christian Farmers Federation of Ontario started a discussion document on the policy implications of farm size. As discussions took place it became clear that differentiated policies are needed to address the needs of all sizes of farms. Ontario agriculture does not lend itself to a “one size fits all” solution.

Ontario’s farm sector continues to try to adapt to changing circumstances and pressures, and it continues to lose many farm families along the way. If this trend is allowed to continue, rural Ontario may very well lose its unique landscape in the foreseeable future and the province will be poorer for it. If Ontario is serious about maintaining an agricultural sector and food production base in this province, it needs to develop a plan for the future of farming. The plan needs to acknowledge the different types of farming that have served consumers so well over the years, and incorporate ways to address their differing needs.

Jenny Denhartog is the Secretary to the Board and Committees of the Christian Farmers Federation of Ontario. The CFFO Commentary represents the opinions of the writer and does not necessarily represent CFFO policy. It can be heard weekly on CKNX Wingham and CFCO Chatham, Ontario and is archived on the CFFO website: www.christianfarmers.org. The CFFO is supported by 4,350 farm families across Ontario.

Views: 68

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

2025-2026 Year in Review Showcases Impacts of Beef Producer Investments

What have your investments in the Canadian Beef Cattle Check-Off accomplished for the industry lately? The Beef Cattle Research Council’s 2025–2026 Year in Review highlights how producer investments and input are advancing research, addressing industry priorities and delivering practical value back to Canada’s beef producers. “The BCRC continues to enhance coordination across the broader beef system, bringing researchers and industry groups together so we can make the best use of limited resources and move solutions and benefits to producers more quickly,” said BCRC Executive Director Tracy Herbert. “The BCRC’s collaborative approach is essential as we address complex challenges and position the Canadian beef industry for long-term success.”   The 2025-2026 BCRC Year in Review provides a broad funding overview by program area and source. In the past fiscal year, the BCRC received on average $0.66 (unaudited) of every $2.50 of the Canadian Beef Cattle Check-Off collected by provincial

Pre-harvest products and how to use them

Canola growers have three primary reasons for a pre-harvest spray application: Weed control ???????Desiccation Manage uneven crop ??????????????Use scenarios for pre-harvest spray Weed control Pre-harvest can be a good time to manage weeds, especially when straight combining. The act of swathing and curing can also provide weed control. Effective control is challenging on big weeds: apply product at the recommended rate with high water volumes to penetrate the crop canopy and achieve thorough coverage. Note: Set reasonable expectations on preventing seed set. Charles Geddes, weed management scientist with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada in Lethbridge, Alberta, says: “There is no easy way to tell if weeds will have mature seed, but in my experience, it happens earlier than one might think. I suggest that the latest a weed should be left is until it is flowering. Once it starts to flower, then some of the seed can mature on the plant after it is terminated. From a weed management p

Pre-harvest glyphosate staging tips help produce market-ready crops

As harvest approaches, Keep it Clean is reminding Canadian canola, cereal and pulse growers to follow proper staging practices for pre-harvest glyphosate application to help protect crop marketability and preserve access to domestic and export markets. Applying pre-harvest glyphosate for weed control too early can result in unacceptable product residues in harvested grain. Keep it Clean’s Pre-Harvest Glyphosate Staging Guide provides visual examples to help growers identify when grain moisture content in canola, cereals and pulses is less than 30 per cent – the only stage at which pre-harvest glyphosate may be applied. Where allowed, glyphosate is registered for pre-harvest weed control and is not to be used as a desiccant. Pre-harvest glyphosate may only be applied when grain moisture content is less than 30 per cent in the least mature part of the field, including any areas of regrowth that may produce seed. “Glyphosate is an important tool in the grower’s toolbox for crop manage

Safeguarding Cereals Against Allergens

Maintaining a reputation for clean, safe grain is essential for both domestic and international markets. Shipments contaminated with allergenic grains can lead to costly rejections, recalls and long-term damage to market confidence. Unintentional mingling of allergenic grains with cereals is a concern for export markets and must be actively managed.  Certain crop types can be allergen sources in our export markets. When these crops are unintentionally mixed with cereals, they can pose serious food safety and market access risks.   Common allergen sources in grain exports include:  Mustard   Soy   Buckwheat   Buckwheat is considered highly allergenic, and even very small amounts mixed into wheat, barley or oats can cause severe reactions in some markets. Because of these risks, many export markets apply strict limits for allergenic material in cereal shipments.  How allergens can contaminate grain  Allergen contamination most often occurs through shared equipment and handling system

Canada Launches First Private Forest Owner Survey in Over 20 Years, Farmers Invited to Participate

Canadian farmers who own woodlots or private forests are being asked to participate in the first national survey of private forest owners in more than 20 years.

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service