Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

The CFFO Commentary: Future of Farming requires Accommodating Differing Views

By Jenny Denhartog

September 3, 2010

The steady decline in the number of family farms in Ontario has been well recognized and publicized. Census numbers indicate that, between 1996 and 2006, Ontario lost more than 10,000 census farms. With the average age of Ontario’s farmers now approaching 60 years, planning the future for Ontario’s farm sector should be top priority.

Within the agricultural sector there are differing views on what the future of farming should look like. As always, individual’s opinions often depend on their own situation. For example, those whose farming income represents just a portion of their total income will often favour smaller, less intensive farms, while those whose sole income depends on the farm business will argue that only bigger, more intensive farms are viable. The possibility of a son or daughter joining the farm business tends to influence one’s perspective as well. So does level of debt, commodity and method of marketing. With all those differing viewpoints, discussions on the topic of long term sustainability of farming can turn into a never-ending exchange of opinions, all of them valid and many of them contradicting each other.

Over the years, these differing farming philosophies have resulted in a very diverse primary production sector. On the one hand, this diversity should be seen as one of Ontario agriculture’s main strengths as it enables our farmers to cater to a diverse consumer base. But as is so often the case, this strength is also a major weakness. Fostering the diversity comes with a multitude of complications when it comes to provincial farm policy development.

Four years ago the Christian Farmers Federation of Ontario started a discussion document on the policy implications of farm size. As discussions took place it became clear that differentiated policies are needed to address the needs of all sizes of farms. Ontario agriculture does not lend itself to a “one size fits all” solution.

Ontario’s farm sector continues to try to adapt to changing circumstances and pressures, and it continues to lose many farm families along the way. If this trend is allowed to continue, rural Ontario may very well lose its unique landscape in the foreseeable future and the province will be poorer for it. If Ontario is serious about maintaining an agricultural sector and food production base in this province, it needs to develop a plan for the future of farming. The plan needs to acknowledge the different types of farming that have served consumers so well over the years, and incorporate ways to address their differing needs.

Jenny Denhartog is the Secretary to the Board and Committees of the Christian Farmers Federation of Ontario. The CFFO Commentary represents the opinions of the writer and does not necessarily represent CFFO policy. It can be heard weekly on CKNX Wingham and CFCO Chatham, Ontario and is archived on the CFFO website: www.christianfarmers.org. The CFFO is supported by 4,350 farm families across Ontario.

Views: 51

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Farm Credit Canada Releases 2026 Hog Outlook

Farm Credit Canada is forecasting a profitable year for the pork sector, similar to last year.

Ag in the House: Feb. 2 – 6

An MP wanted answers about a proposed rail line and how it could affect farmers

Making Soybeans Great Again! And A Fools Gold?

Markets moved sharply during the week of February 2 to 6 as soybeans rallied on trade news while energy, livestock and equities strengthened and metals and cryptocurrencies weakened.

Food Freedom Day 2026 - What Canada’s Grocery Costs Really Tell Us

The Canadian Federation of Agriculture says Canadians reached Food Freedom Day on February 8, 2026 the point at which the average household has earned enough income to pay for a full year of groceries.

USDA Official Calls California’s Prop 12 a Threat to a Unified U.S. Pork Market

A senior USDA official has renewed strong criticism of California’s Proposition 12, calling the state’s animal housing and product sale standards a form of domestic trade protectionism that could disrupt the national pork market and raise costs for producers and consumers. At a recent agriculture policy event, the deputy secretary of agriculture described laws like Prop 12 as creating de-facto trade barriers within the United States. Under the complaint, when a single state sets production standards that apply not just to products sold from within the state but to all products entering its borders, it can place producers in other regions at a competitive disadvantage. Prop 12, first approved by California voters in 2018, sets minimum space requirements for certain livestock and prohibits the sale of pork and other animal products in California that do not meet those standards. Because California represents a large share of U.S. pork consumption but only a small share of production, t

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service