Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

The CFFO Commentary: Future of Farming requires Accommodating Differing Views

By Jenny Denhartog

September 3, 2010

The steady decline in the number of family farms in Ontario has been well recognized and publicized. Census numbers indicate that, between 1996 and 2006, Ontario lost more than 10,000 census farms. With the average age of Ontario’s farmers now approaching 60 years, planning the future for Ontario’s farm sector should be top priority.

Within the agricultural sector there are differing views on what the future of farming should look like. As always, individual’s opinions often depend on their own situation. For example, those whose farming income represents just a portion of their total income will often favour smaller, less intensive farms, while those whose sole income depends on the farm business will argue that only bigger, more intensive farms are viable. The possibility of a son or daughter joining the farm business tends to influence one’s perspective as well. So does level of debt, commodity and method of marketing. With all those differing viewpoints, discussions on the topic of long term sustainability of farming can turn into a never-ending exchange of opinions, all of them valid and many of them contradicting each other.

Over the years, these differing farming philosophies have resulted in a very diverse primary production sector. On the one hand, this diversity should be seen as one of Ontario agriculture’s main strengths as it enables our farmers to cater to a diverse consumer base. But as is so often the case, this strength is also a major weakness. Fostering the diversity comes with a multitude of complications when it comes to provincial farm policy development.

Four years ago the Christian Farmers Federation of Ontario started a discussion document on the policy implications of farm size. As discussions took place it became clear that differentiated policies are needed to address the needs of all sizes of farms. Ontario agriculture does not lend itself to a “one size fits all” solution.

Ontario’s farm sector continues to try to adapt to changing circumstances and pressures, and it continues to lose many farm families along the way. If this trend is allowed to continue, rural Ontario may very well lose its unique landscape in the foreseeable future and the province will be poorer for it. If Ontario is serious about maintaining an agricultural sector and food production base in this province, it needs to develop a plan for the future of farming. The plan needs to acknowledge the different types of farming that have served consumers so well over the years, and incorporate ways to address their differing needs.

Jenny Denhartog is the Secretary to the Board and Committees of the Christian Farmers Federation of Ontario. The CFFO Commentary represents the opinions of the writer and does not necessarily represent CFFO policy. It can be heard weekly on CKNX Wingham and CFCO Chatham, Ontario and is archived on the CFFO website: www.christianfarmers.org. The CFFO is supported by 4,350 farm families across Ontario.

Views: 73

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Upcoming winter Ontario farm shows

Farmers never stop learning

Ag superstitions for Friday the 13th

Passing a baby through cheese is a form of blessing

Could Pumpkin Seeds Find New Life as Coffee Creamer?

Pumpkin seeds may have more value than previously thought. Scientists have turned pumpkin seed protein into a plant-based coffee creamer that beat a commercial nondairy option in an initial taste test.

CANZA Expands Climate-Smart Farming Program by 36,000 Ontario Acres

CANZA is expanding its Million Acre Challenge in Ontario, adding 36,000 acres and approximately 60 farms while increasing financial, agronomic and program-navigation support for producers.

Take a Quantitative Approach to Assigning Territories

Veteran consultant shares data-driven methodology for sales departments Dr. Jim Weber, veteran consultant in the farm and construction equipment industry, identifies territory assignment as a core tactical activity that increases wholegood sales. Rather than treating sales territories as geographical boundaries or a route for sales reps to drive around, Weber presents a mathematical approach to defining, segmenting and staffing territories based on market data, customer value and call capacity math.  “I don’t care if the territories are geographical. I don’t care how they are,” he says. “But we have to assign the territory. We have to have territories for these individuals.”  By replacing guesswork with real data, dealership leaders can transform sales reps from passive into proactive people who manage their assigned market potential.  The Trade Area Formula  The foundation of Weber’s territory model is built on calculating the market size within a dealership’s geographical boundari

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service