Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

The CFFO Commentary: Key Questions for a Changing Agriculture

By John Clement
May 20, 2011
 
Farming is changing. And it’s not just changing in the scale of operations we now have, or the increasingly diverse markets we now supply. It’s also changing in how we view the vocation of farming and how it connects to rural communities and our fellow farmers. Simply put, our emphasis on the business of farming now often overshadows other dimensions to farming that we used to take for granted.
 
At the core of this change is predominately the continuing pressure for farmers to adapt to large-scale production, marketing and distribution systems that create an overall context for on-farm decision-making and planning. Agricultural policies for Canada have increasingly worked out to be trade policies, plus societal pressure is ratcheting up both standards and expectations regarding food. All these factors combine to create continued pressure on farmers to either increase their production capacities, or seek out niche, alternative or value-added opportunities.
 
It’s against this background of change that key questions arise regarding our most basic assumptions about farming. It used to be that how the business of farming was conducted was as big a discussion topic as the business of farming itself. Cooperation and community used to rank a little higher in the overall context of how farming was conducted and were seen as important dimensions to be built into the agricultural infrastructure. Given the continual change in both agriculture and our perceptions about it, I recently posed some “values based” questions at one of our CFFO district association meetings. They include:
·         What role does our fellow farmer have, at home and abroad, in our approaches to the bigger questions and challenges? Are we colleagues or competitors?
·         Should our marketing systems for farm products continue to reflect the “greater good” of the industry, or should we start slanting them towards maximizing the benefits for individual businesses?
·         Are we food producers or are our products destined for industrial purposes? And are we okay with that? Is there something different about food?
·         How are we treating the Creation in our pursuit of profitable businesses? Are we just okay with our practices, or could we be doing better than we are?
·         Does it matter if each county only has one or two large-scale farmers, with the rest being part-timers? Do we care about the “missing middle” in farm scale?
 
My own answer to some of those questions is that some of our traditional assumptions about farming and how it’s conducted need to be revisited in light of the relentless pressure to adapt to business realities. I’m not saying that some of our assumptions about the value of community and cooperation need to be abandoned. But I do think we need to be more intentional about giving our values concrete expression and not expect that they will easily survive in today’s business environment without giving them due attention.
  
John Clement is the General Manager of the Christian Farmers Federation of Ontario. The CFFO Commentary represents the opinions of the writer and does not necessarily represent CFFO policy. The CFFO Commentary is heard weekly on CFCO Chatham, CKNX Wingham, and UCB Canada radio stations in Chatham, Belleville, Bancroft, Brockville and Kingston. It is also archived on the CFFO website: www.christianfarmers.org. CFFO is supported by 4,200 family farmers across Ontario.

Views: 62

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Farming Forward in Watford scheduled for Dec. 1

The event will provide farmers with information about farm transition and funding opportunities

Canada and China extend Preliminary Joint Agreement until 2028

The extension means continued tariff-free access for canola meal

Manitoba Dealer AgWest Seeks Lifeline

One of Manitoba's largest equipment dealership networks has been given a temporary lifeline to stay in business while it seeks new financing, pursues a sale or develops a restructuring plan, as the Manitoba Court of King's Bench granted protection from creditors. AgWest Ltd. could be heading toward liquidation as the company was unable to meet payroll obligations in the middle of harvest season, according to a document filed by the company's bank, the Bank of Montreal. AgWest serves farmers at six dealerships in Manitoba at Elie, Morden, Brandon, Neepawa, Russell and Benito, as well as two locations in Saskatchewan at Weyburn and Yorkton. AgWest Ltd. has defaulted on more than $34 million in loans, according to an opening brief in a restructuring proceeding under Canada's Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act. "Since 2026, the AgWest entities have experienced significant financial difficulties, including liquidity challenges and a general inability to meet their obligations as they

Deere Plans 2 Iowa Plant Closures

John Deere announced plans to close two Iowa manufacturing plants in the next few years and move production to other cities, in a news release from the company on Wednesday. Deere said it will be closing its plant in Ottumwa, Iowa, after moving windrower and round-baler production to Des Moines. In addition, the company said it will end manufacturing at its Hagie plant in Clarion, Iowa, after moving STS sprayer production to Louisiana. Windrower production plans to move to Des Moines by the end of 2027 and round balers would follow by the end of 2028, according to Deere, followed by the closure of the plant in Ottumwa. Hagie STS sprayer production is slated to move to Thibodaux, Louisiana, beginning in 2028 with manufacturing ending in Clarion, Iowa, by the end of 2029. John Deere did not provide employment numbers or say how many jobs would be affected, although other media outlets on Wednesday reported the company has about 700 workers at the Ottumwa plant. The number of employee

Diesel Fuel Waivers Bring Engine Compatibility Concerns and Tax Rule Questions

Responding to the surge in diesel fuel prices, federal and state lawmakers introduced temporary measures intended to provide economic relief. These actions raise questions about fuel use requirements and fuel taxation. “Temporary relief measures may help reduce operating costs, but diesel users should not assume that all diesel fuels are interchangeable,” said Allen Schaeffer, executive director of the Engine Technology Forum. “Understanding which fuel is appropriate for a particular engine and complying with tax and regulatory requirements can help avoid equipment damage, unnecessary maintenance costs, warranty concerns, and compliance issues.” Texas and Alaska get ULSD exemptions Ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD) is the standard diesel fuel used for both on-highway and off-highway applications throughout the United States, and it is regulated to a maximum sulfur content of 15 parts per million (ppm). On Oct 5, Texas was granted a waiver to supply diesel fuel with up to 500 ppm of sul

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service