Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

The CFFO Commentary: Key Questions for a Changing Agriculture

By John Clement
May 20, 2011
 
Farming is changing. And it’s not just changing in the scale of operations we now have, or the increasingly diverse markets we now supply. It’s also changing in how we view the vocation of farming and how it connects to rural communities and our fellow farmers. Simply put, our emphasis on the business of farming now often overshadows other dimensions to farming that we used to take for granted.
 
At the core of this change is predominately the continuing pressure for farmers to adapt to large-scale production, marketing and distribution systems that create an overall context for on-farm decision-making and planning. Agricultural policies for Canada have increasingly worked out to be trade policies, plus societal pressure is ratcheting up both standards and expectations regarding food. All these factors combine to create continued pressure on farmers to either increase their production capacities, or seek out niche, alternative or value-added opportunities.
 
It’s against this background of change that key questions arise regarding our most basic assumptions about farming. It used to be that how the business of farming was conducted was as big a discussion topic as the business of farming itself. Cooperation and community used to rank a little higher in the overall context of how farming was conducted and were seen as important dimensions to be built into the agricultural infrastructure. Given the continual change in both agriculture and our perceptions about it, I recently posed some “values based” questions at one of our CFFO district association meetings. They include:
·         What role does our fellow farmer have, at home and abroad, in our approaches to the bigger questions and challenges? Are we colleagues or competitors?
·         Should our marketing systems for farm products continue to reflect the “greater good” of the industry, or should we start slanting them towards maximizing the benefits for individual businesses?
·         Are we food producers or are our products destined for industrial purposes? And are we okay with that? Is there something different about food?
·         How are we treating the Creation in our pursuit of profitable businesses? Are we just okay with our practices, or could we be doing better than we are?
·         Does it matter if each county only has one or two large-scale farmers, with the rest being part-timers? Do we care about the “missing middle” in farm scale?
 
My own answer to some of those questions is that some of our traditional assumptions about farming and how it’s conducted need to be revisited in light of the relentless pressure to adapt to business realities. I’m not saying that some of our assumptions about the value of community and cooperation need to be abandoned. But I do think we need to be more intentional about giving our values concrete expression and not expect that they will easily survive in today’s business environment without giving them due attention.
  
John Clement is the General Manager of the Christian Farmers Federation of Ontario. The CFFO Commentary represents the opinions of the writer and does not necessarily represent CFFO policy. The CFFO Commentary is heard weekly on CFCO Chatham, CKNX Wingham, and UCB Canada radio stations in Chatham, Belleville, Bancroft, Brockville and Kingston. It is also archived on the CFFO website: www.christianfarmers.org. CFFO is supported by 4,200 family farmers across Ontario.

Views: 62

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Ag in the House: Oct. 26 – 30

Minister MacDonald highlighted how the government is supporting food security

Exploring grape pomace’s potential as pork sausage preservative

Scientists at Iowa State University are studying grape pomace as an alternative preservative for pork breakfast sausage. The U.S. sausage market exceeds $7.5 billion. Processed meats often use synthetic ingredients to maintain overall quality, stability and safety. However, consumer preferences toward “clean-label” ingredients and recent reassessments of some food additives, such as butylated hydroxyanisole, are boosting interest in more natural alternatives. Grape pomace is a by-product of winemaking, obtained after pressing white grapes or after fermentation and pressing of red grapes. GP represents a rich source of fiber and phenolic compounds, but it is usually composted, used as animal feed or discarded. “This winemaking by-product is often wasted, but we know that GP has some antimicrobial and antioxidant properties,” said Aude Watrelot, assistant professor of enology in food science and human nutrition. “How effective would GP be when substituted for current additives in a po

Canadian Pork Research Enters New Phase with More Flexible Funding for Industry Priorities

Canada’s pork industry is strengthening its approach to research and innovation through a funding model designed to address both long-term industry priorities and emerging challenges facing producers. Swine Innovation Porc (SIP), the national organization coordinating research for Canada’s pork sector, has released its 2025–26 annual report, highlighting the continued development of its national research programs and the introduction of additional funding flexibility. At the centre of this approach are two complementary initiatives: the established Swine Cluster program and the newer Advancing Swine Research Program. Together, these programs are intended to strengthen the industry’s ability to invest in scientific discovery while supporting practical research that responds to changing production conditions. Building on More Than a Decade of Collaborative Research Since 2010, Canada’s Swine Cluster program has provided a foundation for coordinated research involving universities, re

Canadian Swine Researchers Face November 13 Deadline for Up to $150,000 in Research Funding

Swine Innovation Porc is seeking research proposals focused on animal health, biosecurity, production efficiency, sustainability and pork quality, with funding available for projects addressing key challenges facing Canada’s pork industry. Canadian swine researchers have until November 13 to submit letters of intent for a new round of funding through the Advancing Swine Research Program, an initiative designed to strengthen the competitiveness, efficiency and long-term sustainability of Canada’s pork sector. Administered by Swine Innovation Porc (SIP), in partnership with the Pork Promotion and Research Agency (PPRA), the program supports industry-focused research that delivers practical benefits to producers, processors and the broader pork value chain. Successful projects may receive funding covering up to 50% of eligible project costs, with a maximum contribution of $50,000 annually over three years, representing a potential investment of $150,000 per project. Research Prioritie

When Pork’s Seasonal Recovery Doesn’t Arrive: What Canada Packers’ Q3 Results Reveal About the Market

Canada Packers’ third-quarter results offer a revealing look at the pressures facing North American pork production. Beyond the company’s $28.1 million loss, the more important story involves weakening pork demand, unusually compressed processing margins, and questions about when the industry can expect more favourable market conditions. For an industry accustomed to seasonal fluctuations, the absence of a typical summer recovery in pork values may be one of the most significant developments emerging from Canada Packers’ latest earnings report. The company reported third-quarter sales of $420.7 million, down 12.7% from the same period in 2025, alongside a net loss of $28.1 million compared with a profit of $25.6 million a year earlier. Adjusted EBITDA declined to $31.5 million from a pro forma $56 million in the comparable period, reflecting the effects of broader market compression. The reported net loss also included a $47.6 million non-cash decline in the fair value of biological

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service