Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

Farm Org. Funding.

Today's Ontario Farmer had an interesting letter which proposed calculating the funding for farm organizations on a per acre basis. The intent, I suppose, would be to spread the cost according to potential benefit.

The acreage could easily be calculated from the existing Agricorp files.

Views: 117

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Dale Ketcheson on December 1, 2009 at 1:15pm
Maybe... if all acres were created equal and all farms were dependent on acreage. They aren't. Should an acre under glass in a greenhouse be counted the same as $800 rough pasture? Should 20,000 broilers on a 5 acre lot be counted the same as a 5 acre pick your own?

Haven't seen it yet, probably won't until the weekend so I'm just guessing on the content of the letter.
Permalink Reply by Wayne Black on December 2, 2009 at 2:33pm
You are correct Dale - close enough anyway.
Another question would be - what about the farmers who do not own or crop any land at all? The ones who rent barns to feed cattle or milk livestock? There are so many different types of arrangements for a farm operation today it would not make sense to set the fee based solely on acreage or livestock units because of "assumed benefit".
The arguement a few years ago was: If Large Farmer pays $320 per year and little farmer pays $80 per year - does that mean the Large Farmer gets 4 votes for every vote the little farmer gets? The General Farm Organizations are suppose to represent their members. The membership includes all landowners and farmers who have a Gross Revenue from Farming operations in excess of $7,000 per year ("gross" not "net"). Each member is entitled to one vote.
Permalink Reply by Joann on December 16, 2009 at 4:45pm
the bigger question is.... do we need the present farm organizations? or are they completely stale-dated in today's environment?

if the present farm organizations were disbanded, will farmers be served better or worse?

if one looks around, i believe one will see that there are some very big farm operations that are more effective and efficient as individual lobbyist. ... farm operations are getting bigger and fewer.

is there a new farm lobby-organization on the horizon that will effectively meet the needs of the next generation of farm operations?

Wayne Black said:
You are correct Dale - close enough anyway.
Another question would be - what about the farmers who do not own or crop any land at all? The ones who rent barns to feed cattle or milk livestock? There are so many different types of arrangements for a farm operation today it would not make sense to set the fee based solely on acreage or livestock units because of "assumed benefit".
The arguement a few years ago was: If Large Farmer pays $320 per year and little farmer pays $80 per year - does that mean the Large Farmer gets 4 votes for every vote the little farmer gets? The General Farm Organizations are suppose to represent their members. The membership includes all landowners and farmers who have a Gross Revenue from Farming operations in excess of $7,000 per year ("gross" not "net"). Each member is entitled to one vote.
Permalink Reply by Avia Eek on December 17, 2009 at 5:16am
I have more of a statement to make, since I haven't read the paper yet--will get to that later. Generally, though as far as farm organizations are concerned, a good question would be how does the Farmer benefit from them. I know the Holland Marsh Farmers are, and continue to fight the peaker plant being built in the Holland Marsh, but I don't know that any OFA representative has stepped in and added their voice to this issue which will affect all the people in Ontario. Not to mention the precedent this is setting for prime agricultural land versus the need for energy. Our own local organization, the Holland Marsh Growers' Association is fighting this, but it seems we're on our own! The only benefit I see, right now, with OFA is cheaper taxes.
Permalink Reply by Ken McCormack on January 31, 2010 at 3:47pm
This idea has a lot of merit, particularly for the new Grain Farmers of Ontario. Since most of their members grow corn, wheat and soybeans in rotation on approximately the same acreage it would be a stable funding for them independent of yields and specific crops.

The only real breakdown is for those who grow crops for 'own use'. They would end up paying on acres they plan to feed to livestock. It can be said they still benefit from improvements in the crops, but it would be a harder sell.

▶ Reply to Discussion

RSS

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Tackling Risk in Agriculture has Never Been Harder, Ag Expo Hears

The risks for today’s agricultural producers has never been higher — but that doesn’t mean the industry can’t adapt and thrive. “Today’s farmers must navigate a complex web of interrelated challenges,” says Dr. Camille Ryan, Senior Business Partner in Industry Affairs and Sustainability at Bayer Crop Science Canada. “The industry’s resilience hinges on a comprehensive grasp of these risks and the relationships between them.” Perhaps not surprising, economic turbulence was at the forefront of Ryan’s discussion. “We’re looking at a lengthy list of economic risks that are always shifting,” she says, pointing to market fluctuations, changing commodity prices, rising input costs, and shifting trade laws as key factors complicating profitability for farmers. “These challenges make it increasingly difficult to maintain sustainable operations.” Most notably, the looming threat of tariffs from the U.S. administration creates increased unpredictability and the potential to severely impact fa

U of G Advancing Soil Health

University of Guelph is tackling climate change and advancing soil health with $4 million investment.

International Women’s Day – Angela Cammaert

Angela Cammaert can rely on the ag community to offer support when she needs it

Ag Minister Lawrence MacAulay retiring from politics

Lawrence MacAulay quitting federal politics after almost 40 years

Canola in cosmetics? It’s a beautiful thing!

A true “made-in-Canada” success story, canola is one of the world’s most important oilseeds and one of Canada’s leading crops and while most Canadians know canola oil as heart healthy kitchen staple, few have heard of its benefits for skin and hair. That’s right – as a common ingredient in skincare, haircare and cosmetic products, canola oil is helping brands all over the world make their customers look and feel their best everyday. Canola oil, a 100% product-of-Canada ingredient, can be found in shampoos and conditioners, soaps, lip balms, body lotions and scrubs due to its moisturizing properties and neutral scent1,2. One could speculate that the reason canola oil doesn’t get its due in the beauty space is because it often shows up on cosmetic labels under different names. If you’re eyeing ingredient lists, here are some ways canola oil is listed on common beauty products: Canolate – A processed form of canola oil. Brassica napus seed oil – The scientific name for the canola plant

© 2025   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service