Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

Today's Ontario Farmer had an interesting letter which proposed calculating the funding for farm organizations on a per acre basis. The intent, I suppose, would be to spread the cost according to potential benefit.

The acreage could easily be calculated from the existing Agricorp files.

Views: 137

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Maybe... if all acres were created equal and all farms were dependent on acreage. They aren't. Should an acre under glass in a greenhouse be counted the same as $800 rough pasture? Should 20,000 broilers on a 5 acre lot be counted the same as a 5 acre pick your own?

Haven't seen it yet, probably won't until the weekend so I'm just guessing on the content of the letter.
You are correct Dale - close enough anyway.
Another question would be - what about the farmers who do not own or crop any land at all? The ones who rent barns to feed cattle or milk livestock? There are so many different types of arrangements for a farm operation today it would not make sense to set the fee based solely on acreage or livestock units because of "assumed benefit".
The arguement a few years ago was: If Large Farmer pays $320 per year and little farmer pays $80 per year - does that mean the Large Farmer gets 4 votes for every vote the little farmer gets? The General Farm Organizations are suppose to represent their members. The membership includes all landowners and farmers who have a Gross Revenue from Farming operations in excess of $7,000 per year ("gross" not "net"). Each member is entitled to one vote.
the bigger question is.... do we need the present farm organizations? or are they completely stale-dated in today's environment?

if the present farm organizations were disbanded, will farmers be served better or worse?

if one looks around, i believe one will see that there are some very big farm operations that are more effective and efficient as individual lobbyist. ... farm operations are getting bigger and fewer.

is there a new farm lobby-organization on the horizon that will effectively meet the needs of the next generation of farm operations?

Wayne Black said:
You are correct Dale - close enough anyway.
Another question would be - what about the farmers who do not own or crop any land at all? The ones who rent barns to feed cattle or milk livestock? There are so many different types of arrangements for a farm operation today it would not make sense to set the fee based solely on acreage or livestock units because of "assumed benefit".
The arguement a few years ago was: If Large Farmer pays $320 per year and little farmer pays $80 per year - does that mean the Large Farmer gets 4 votes for every vote the little farmer gets? The General Farm Organizations are suppose to represent their members. The membership includes all landowners and farmers who have a Gross Revenue from Farming operations in excess of $7,000 per year ("gross" not "net"). Each member is entitled to one vote.
I have more of a statement to make, since I haven't read the paper yet--will get to that later. Generally, though as far as farm organizations are concerned, a good question would be how does the Farmer benefit from them. I know the Holland Marsh Farmers are, and continue to fight the peaker plant being built in the Holland Marsh, but I don't know that any OFA representative has stepped in and added their voice to this issue which will affect all the people in Ontario. Not to mention the precedent this is setting for prime agricultural land versus the need for energy. Our own local organization, the Holland Marsh Growers' Association is fighting this, but it seems we're on our own! The only benefit I see, right now, with OFA is cheaper taxes.
This idea has a lot of merit, particularly for the new Grain Farmers of Ontario. Since most of their members grow corn, wheat and soybeans in rotation on approximately the same acreage it would be a stable funding for them independent of yields and specific crops.

The only real breakdown is for those who grow crops for 'own use'. They would end up paying on acres they plan to feed to livestock. It can be said they still benefit from improvements in the crops, but it would be a harder sell.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Nearly $10 million allocated to crop research

Crop research is receiving a total of $9.7 million in funding from the federal and provincial governments. Of the $9.7 million, $7.2 million is through the Agriculture Development Fund (ADF) to support 39 research projects and $2.5 million through the Strategic Research Initiative (SRI) to study the long-term management of herbicide resistant kochia and wild oats. Provincial Agriculture Minister David Marit was at the Western Development Museum, where the Sask Crops Forum is being held, to make the announcement Tuesday morning. "First and foremost, I really got to thank the ADF board, the committee. They go through a lot of projects, probably two or three hundred, and they weed it down to ones that are really important to the farmers and ranchers here in the Province of Saskatchewan," Marit told reporters. "And when you look at the list of the projects that they have approved, it's really some good work. I mean, the one that we just announced obviously for kochia and wild oats is go

Saskatchewan Ag Hall of Fame honours farm-to-table advocate

Farm-to-table advocate Joe Kleinsasser headlines the 2026 Saskatchewan Agricultural Hall of Fame class, recognized for more than two decades of consumer education and leadership in agriculture. Six inductees were announced Tuesday, Jan. 13, during the 48th Western Canada Production Show at the NuFarm Information Theatre in Hall B of Prairieland Park. Kleinsasser, whose family is a member of the Hutterite Colony in Rosetown, was honoured for more than two decades of advocacy educating consumers about the farm-to-table journey of food production — from producers and processors to grocery stores, markets and meals served at home. He said he felt honoured to be included in the provincial Ag Hall of Fame. Other 2026 inductees are Cecil Werner, Terry Baker, Norbert Beaujot, Mary McKay Lindsay and Mark Picard. Lindsay and Picard are inducted posthumously. Kleinsasser served for seven years on the Sask Pork board beginning in 2002 and was also SPI Marketing Group’s director from 1999 to 20

Sask Wheat commits over $2.1 million to wheat research and strategic initiatives

The Saskatchewan Wheat Development Commission (Sask Wheat) has committed over $2.1 million supporting 12 research projects funded under the Saskatchewan Agriculture Development Fund (ADF) and one Strategic Research Initiative (SRI) project in 2026. The Honourable David Marit, Minster of Agriculture, announced the funding of all crop-related ADF projects funded through the Sustainable Canadian Agricultural Partnership (Sustainable CAP) at the Saskatchewan Crops Forum today. “Today’s funding announcement signals to producers that we have strong partners with federal and provincial governments to tackle agricultural challenges and continue to unlock our potential,” said outgoing Sask Wheat board chair Jake Leguee. Sask Wheat’s funding includes projects identified through the ADF intake process and funded by Sask Wheat in partnership with ADF and/or with other Prairie crop commissions. The approved projects include harnessing genetic resistance and cold plasma for management of bacterial

New program supports Canadian farmers with succession planning

A new program is available to help Canadian farm families on their succession plan journeys

Syngenta brings Elatus Era fungicide to lentil growers

The product protects against anthracnose, white mould, and Ascochyta blight

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service