Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

Sandy and I watched Food Inc. on the CBC.  Did anyone else see it?  How did make you feel?

 

I am not sure how I feel about it, they made some interesting points.

The movie makes the large agri business firms look bad....that is who they are targeting.

 

They claim modern technology and large scale has some negative consequences - ecoli, overweight kids....

 

Here is the movie trailer,

 

Views: 532

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Overweight kids - yup, part of modern agbiz technology includes strapping some poor, skinny kid into a chair and, against their will,  ramming an endless stream of Big Macs and Baconators down their throat with the sole and inevitable consequence of causing childhood obesity. On their own, these poor, overweight kids would never do anything to contribute to their own extra poundage.

 

Thus, they are completely absolved of personal responsibility for their agbiz industry-induced, unhealthy physical state.

 

Therefore, it is clear that personal eating choices have nothing to do with society's obesity epidemic.

 

Well at least that's what Eric Schlosser and Michael Pollan types would have you believe . . .

 

"The average consumer does not feel very powerful . . .the exact opposite", says the driver of the mini van while the mother and child? (@1:23) sit there and chow back on fast food. Were they powerless to choose a healthier kind of meal?

 

It is self-contradictions and lies like this, interspersed with half truths and misrepresented facts, that destroys any credibility that the producers of Food Inc. so desperately try to achieve. The trouble is, this type of media strikes a chord with the ill-informed consumer of today.

 

What really trips my trigger on this issue is that the consumer totally fails to acknowledge or understand their part in driving agricultural practices to what it has become today. The consumers that support the big stores offering the lowest prices are 99% at fault for driving modern into an "economy of scale" type of production.

 

They want cheap food - well, they get cheap food, but the way it is mass produced is part of the hidden cost.

 

 

Interesting points John,

 

If anyone wants to watch it online...it is on the CBC.ca site.

 

http://www.cbc.ca/documentaries/passionateeyeshowcase/2010/foodinc/

 

Happy New Year,

 

Sandy

 

 

Good points John but I also believe people need to be reminded of the evolution of agri-business through the political process.

 

One person that stands out is Dr. Earl Butz, Sec. of Agriculture under Pres. Nixon and Ford.

 

His mantra which is refective of his persona:  "Get big or get out".

 

Agri-business took a firm root under his tenure, corn production exploded and the use of high fructose corn syrup became a cheap and effective additive to the exploding "fast food" businesses.

 

And he was also noted for the quote: (Time magazine November 11, 1974) 


"Food is a weapon. It is now one of the principal tools in our negotiating kit".  (this from the U.S.A. Sec. of Agriculture!!!!)

 

So it just begs the question...... If food is a weapon... who are the intended targets? ... and to what end?

 

John Schwartzentruber said:

Overweight kids - yup, part of modern agbiz technology includes strapping some poor, skinny kid into a chair and, against their will,  ramming an endless stream of Big Macs and Baconators down their throat with the sole and inevitable consequence of causing childhood obesity. On their own, these poor, overweight kids would never do anything to contribute to their own extra poundage.

 

Thus, they are completely absolved of personal responsibility for their agbiz industry-induced, unhealthy physical state.

 

Therefore, it is clear that personal eating choices have nothing to do with society's obesity epidemic.

 

Well at least that's what Eric Schlosser and Michael Pollan types would have you believe . . .

 

"The average consumer does not feel very powerful . . .the exact opposite", says the driver of the mini van while the mother and child? (@1:23) sit there and chow back on fast food. Were they powerless to choose a healthier kind of meal?

 

It is self-contradictions and lies like this, interspersed with half truths and misrepresented facts, that destroys any credibility that the producers of Food Inc. so desperately try to achieve. The trouble is, this type of media strikes a chord with the ill-informed consumer of today.

 

What really trips my trigger on this issue is that the consumer totally fails to acknowledge or understand their part in driving agricultural practices to what it has become today. The consumers that support the big stores offering the lowest prices are 99% at fault for driving modern into an "economy of scale" type of production.

 

They want cheap food - well, they get cheap food, but the way it is mass produced is part of the hidden cost.

 

 

John you will find that the food is more extensive in poor suburbs and more fastfood franchisers than the white collar areas of a city. Ads are in the kids faces, from the day they sit in front of the TV.  Low income people have no choice, but to buy these foods, a person living on the dole or minum wage, are living on credit as it is.  It is alright to sit in an ivory castle and throw rocks. You have limited resources, pack the kids up and go to the farmers market an hour down the road the will cost you a hundres bucks all up, or go to Walmart and MacDonalds cost you 50.
Let me tell you a little story about Wollworth coming to town, with in a year they got the local council to close the local market though bylaws. Two butcher shops and three independanthree grocery stores closed who bought of local farmer, milk, fruit and vegitables and meat. My father's was one of the butcher shops. 
John Schwartzentruber said:

Overweight kids - yup, part of modern agbiz technology includes strapping some poor, skinny kid into a chair and, against their will,  ramming an endless stream of Big Macs and Baconators down their throat with the sole and inevitable consequence of causing childhood obesity. On their own, these poor, overweight kids would never do anything to contribute to their own extra poundage.

 

Thus, they are completely absolved of personal responsibility for their agbiz industry-induced, unhealthy physical state.

 

Therefore, it is clear that personal eating choices have nothing to do with society's obesity epidemic.

 

Well at least that's what Eric Schlosser and Michael Pollan types would have you believe . . .

 

"The average consumer does not feel very powerful . . .the exact opposite", says the driver of the mini van while the mother and child? (@1:23) sit there and chow back on fast food. Were they powerless to choose a healthier kind of meal?

 

It is self-contradictions and lies like this, interspersed with half truths and misrepresented facts, that destroys any credibility that the producers of Food Inc. so desperately try to achieve. The trouble is, this type of media strikes a chord with the ill-informed consumer of today.

 

What really trips my trigger on this issue is that the consumer totally fails to acknowledge or understand their part in driving agricultural practices to what it has become today. The consumers that support the big stores offering the lowest prices are 99% at fault for driving modern into an "economy of scale" type of production.

 

They want cheap food - well, they get cheap food, but the way it is mass produced is part of the hidden cost.

 

 

Sorry, I'm kinda slow on the uptake here.

 

So, please make something clear for me - How many dollars does it cost to pay for a meal for a family of four at McDonald's? How many dollars does it cost to buy a package of hamburger buns, a head of lettuce and 2 lbs. of ground beef?

 

Numbers, please.

 

Torronto prices as of today 11 Jan2005
Mince beef 12.79 per kg converted to 4 Ilbs $25.59

head of lettuce $4.99

hambers buns 1.00 by 4 $4.00

Total $31.08 tax not included

 

$5 for a big mack x 4 $20 and no washing up or cooking.

 


John Schwartzentruber said:

Sorry, I'm kinda slow on the uptake here.

 

So, please make something clear for me - How many dollars does it cost to pay for a meal for a family of four at McDonald's? How many dollars does it cost to buy a package of hamburger buns, a head of lettuce and 2 lbs. of ground beef?

 

Numbers, please.

 

If I am not mistaken, you priced enough ground beef and lettuce to make at least 16 Big Macs, if not Quarter pounders. Maybe the real problem is that some fast food/fat food shoppers cannot do math and comparative shopping and don't like cleanup...

Here is what happens when someone declines to take responsibility for her/his own personal condition -

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V168xofxgu0

 

 

Where are you buying your ground beef from?  MacDonalds big mac does not have extra lean ground veal meat, and only has (2) patties, which does not add up to 1 lb of meat.  You can buy a head of lettuce for $2 and make at least 10 hamburgers with it also (thats a lot of lettuce).  People just like to make excuses for not having to put the effort into making your own dinner. It is a lot cheaper to eat at home, really cheap if you shop for your ingredients.   People just like everything to be convenient, and shop usually at a big box store also.  You forgot about the cost of driving to the restaurant (ie fuel, mileage on vehicle etc.)
Prices are from the net from Torronto, the conversion is from Kg to pounds. As for the prices they may vary depending on the competition. I went to Hearst today one suppermarket in the town. Head of lettus $3, 4bls of Beef mince $24.05, hamburgar buns pack of 6 $6.00. Total $31.05. Distance travel 30km. Yes you may get more, I have no quarms that eating at home you may get more for your dollar. But when you are unemployed, living on the pension, or a single mother with five kids to five fathers, a old pensioner in a flat depress as shit and a Mac ad comes on. As Andy says people want convience, and if your are given the illution, that is cheap at fast food place.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Steady Ontario Planting Progress

Ontario producers continued to make steady planting progress over the past week, although intermittent rainfall and uneven field conditions are still creating a patchwork of advancement across the province. Corn planting reached 86% complete as of Wednesday, according to Grain Farmers of Ontario’s weekly field observations report on Thursday. That is up from 74% a week earlier. Progress varies widely by region, with some areas wrapping up seeding while others remain delayed due to rainfall differences, heavier soils, and lingering wet field conditions. Corn development remains in its early stages, ranging from emergence to the two-leaf stage, but warm temperatures forecast this week are expected to support rapid crop growth. As planting windows narrow, some producers are beginning to shift intended corn acres into soybeans, the report said. Soybean planting also accelerated during the week, reaching 61% complete compared to 39% previously. However, heavy-clay regions remain behin

Canadian Farm Debt Rises in 2025, but at Slower Pace

Canadian farm debt continued to increase in 2025, although at a slower pace. A Statistics Canada farm income report released earlier this week pegged total nationwide farm debt at the end of last year at $179.1 billion. That is still a 7.5% increase from the previous year but well down from the 14.1% increase in debt that farmers took on in 2024 compared to 2023. Meanwhile, StatsCan data shows farm interest expenses reached $9.19 billion in 2025, up $90.99 million from $9.1 billion in 2024, representing a modest year-over-year increase of about 1%. The increase in 2025 interest expenses followed a much steeper jump in 2024, when annual farm interest expenses surged by roughly $2.02 billion to $9.1 billion — an increase of 28.6%. That sharp rise in 2024 interest expenses reflected the impact of higher interest rates across the economy, which significantly increased borrowing costs for producers at a time when many farms were already facing elevated expenses for inputs, machinery,

Chicago Close: Weaker into Weekend as Crude Falls

Losses in crude oil weighed on crop futures Friday, as easing geopolitical tensions and improving crop prospects combined to pressured into the weekend. Wheat led the declines as traders removed weather and geopolitical risk premium from the market. Benchmark Chicago wheat fell for the sixth time in seven sessions amid improving weather conditions across key production regions. Losses in crude oil, due to growing expectations the U.S. and Iran could move closer to a peace agreement, added to the downside. July Chicago dropped 13 ½ cents to $6.10 ½, and July Kansas City dropped 15 ½ cents to $6.49 ¾. July Hard Red Spring tumbled 36 ½ cents to $6.72 ¼, and July Minneapolis lost 13 ½ cents to $6.63 ¾. Corn futures also moved lower as traders reduced risk exposure ahead of the weekend. Export demand offered limited support, with USDA reporting 1.015 million tonnes of old-crop export sales for 2025-26, near the lower end of expectations and down sharply from the previous week. However,

At Olds College Smart Farm, everything is new

If you take Alberta’s Highway 2 south from Edmonton toward Calgary, the landscape is pure prairie. The highway bisects fields that unfold endlessly toward a horizon that most evenings is a pastel blend of mauve and sherbet orange. There’s little else along this stretch of rural paradise, save for rest stops and the occasional lonely highway casino, their parking lots full of F-150s. Driving this route between Alberta’s major cities can become so routine that the only way to tell you’re actually moving is to count the passing farms that dot the landscape. One of those farms is distinctly not like the others. Just 45 minutes shy of Red Deer, in Olds, Alta., sits the Olds College Smart Farm. The 3,300 acres on which this part of a century-old post-secondary institution sits look like most other farms in the area. The fields rotate with the seasons between green, canola yellow, and gold. Its herd of purebred Red Angus cattle and flocks of sheep graze leisurely in the feedlot. But l

Lamb 'too costly' for some Muslims in Manitoba ahead of Eid al-Adha celebrations

A halal grocery store owner in Winnipeg says the rising cost of lamb has made it difficult for some Muslims to buy the animal or meat ahead of Eid al-Adha on Wednesday. The Festival of Sacrifice is an Islamic holiday that celebrates the prophet Ibrahim's obedience and loyalty to Allah, reminding Muslims of community and to practise gratitude and selflessness. On this day, it's traditional to have a lamb slaughtered — a practice known as Qurbani — and share its meat with family, friends and those in need. Khaldoun Majani said the price of lamb has nearly doubled to $28.50 per kilogram at his store since he started running Alsham Food Market in Winnipeg more than a decade ago. A lot of people want to buy lamb for Eid al-Adha, "but at the same time, they feel like it's out of budget," he said. "That makes it [a] little bit hard for some people." The Manitoba Islamic Association expects some community members, especially newcomers, to find alternatives to slaughtering a lamb themselv

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service