Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

Which is Better-Livestock or Deadstock?

If you are going to have livestock, you are going to have deadstock.

I don’t know who coined that term, but every farmer knows it’s the truth. But that doesn’t mean you leave anything sick to die.

That would appear to be what some folks rather we do. As noted in an article in TIME Magazine and the New York Times, the world seems to have something against antibiotics.

I’m going to use our small dairy farm as an example. It’s been a tough couple of weeks. After months of no mastitis or major illness we’ve had five come up mastitis in the last two weeks and one with hardware (ill from eating foreign objects like metal). For a farm of 40 cows milking, that’s not a nice percentage. But, it happens.

So what are we to do? If we are to turn our back on antibiotics, all six of those cows would either be dead or under extreme discomfort with little milk to give. Is that a better option than using antibiotics to improve their health? Or we can treat those animals with the necessary medication to get them feeling better. Keep in mind after they have been treated, any milk they produce goes down the drain (usually for the next 4 days) to ensure that the antibiotics don’t end up in your ice cream cone. For animals in the meat chain, withdrawal periods exist as well, sometimes for a number of weeks.

Now I can hear the naysayers already - what about the antibiotics used to treat an animal before they are sick? Well if I recall, I’ve been treated for mumps, measles, tetanus, hepatitis and more – but have never fallen ill from those diseases. Then again if I ever got some of those, I might not be here to write this article. Animals are the same. There are ferociously viral diseases that are better to be prevented than treated after the fact.

So how about we take it easy on this antibiotic debate. The industry will continue to work to see how they can reduce antibiotic use in the first place. After all medication is expensive so it’s in our best interest to use them sparingly. But until we have animals that don’t get sick, we are going to need medication.

Besides, I prefer the livestock to the deadstock.

Views: 43

Comment

You need to be a member of Ontario Agriculture to add comments!

Join Ontario Agriculture

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Cdn. ag industry launches Canada’s Food System national campaign

The campaign celebrates the people, innovation, and strength in Canada’s food system

Trump Xi Meeting Sparks Optimism as U.S. Grain Stocks Weigh on Markets

Farm markets saw mixed signals this week as a bearish USDA grain report weighed on sentiment, but optimism grew over Trump–Xi trade talks, potential aid for farmers, and easing oil prices.

PIC genetics reduce North American pork producers’ greenhouse gas emissions by 7.5%

North American pork producers using PIC genetics now have peer-reviewed, ISO-conformant research to show that genetic improvement efforts are making a quantifiable impact – at a time when protein sustainability has never been more important.  PIC worked with Dr. Greg Thoma, a global environmental modeling expert, to complete a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studying the impact of pig breeding on the environmental sustainability of North American pig production.1 An LCA analyzes the effect a product has on the environment over its lifetime; in this case, monitoring the environmental impact of live swine production through to slaughter. GHG reductions with PIC genetics The North American LCA and a prior European LCA are among the first of their kind to quantify the environmental impact of swine genetic improvement and to receive ISO conformance. Key LCA findings: The North American LCA showed that full program PIC genetics (sire + dam) emit 7.5% less greenhouse gases than industry avera

Corteva separating into two entities

Corteva says it will separate its seed and pesticide businesses into separate listed companies, as the agrichemicals firm seeks to sharpen its strategic focus. The separation will allow each company to set specific capital allocation strategies, respond faster to market shifts and pursue growth opportunities independently. Its shares fell about seven per cent to their lowest in nearly five months.  The stock has fallen more than 14 per cent since the Wall Street Journal reported the company’s spin-off plans last month, as analysts raised concerns about disruption and dilution. The company has estimated added costs from splitting the company, of $80 million-$100 million US. Corteva’s seed business accounted for 57 per cent of its total sales in 2024, with remaining coming from its other segment, which produces herbicides, fungicides, insecticides and seed treatments.

Why Maizex is Bringing Canola to Alberta

Alberta trials are underway as Maizex prepares to offer booking for 2026. If you told me a few years ago that Maizex would be moving into canola, I might’ve called you optimistic. But here we are. After nearly four decades in Canadian agriculture and a strong national footprint in corn and soybean genetics, Maizex Seeds is officially entering the canola market — and yes, Alberta farmers, that means you. This move didn’t happen overnight. It’s been a multi-year process of strategy, scouting, and listening. Listening to farmers. Listening to dealers. And listening to what the canola market still needs — especially in the West. We’re launching our first two Maizex-branded canola hybrids for planting in 2026, and we’re excited to finally talk about it. This isn’t just about entering a new crop category. It’s about bringing a Canadian-owned alternative to the table — one focused on farmer-first service and choice in a market that, frankly, could use more of both. As I’m writing this, I’

© 2025   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service