Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

AgVisionTV: Steven Blank discusses the End of Agriculture. What do you think?

I wanted to see what people thought of Steven Blank's thoughts and opinions.

Thanks,

Kevin


Click on the Play button to watch the video.


Views: 161

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Joann on April 29, 2010 at 4:38am
I have not read any of Mr. Blanks' book, so I am gleaning personal opinions solely on his interview.

In my opinion, there were some serious omissions in his observations. He did not touch on the USA Farm Bill and the guaranteed support American farmers receive.. not to mention the Parity Clause farmers entrenched in the 1937(?) Farm Bill. The Canada Farm support system changed in 1998 from COP to a welfare system based on whole farm income.

He speaks of profit margins being squeezed with price fluctuations but neglects the relationship between farmers that capitalize their operations vs farmers with capital stagnation. Farmers with less/no debt have a far better survival rate. It is no small wonder the average age of Canadian farmers is well into the 60's.

The food versus ethanol point he extracts, in my opinion, is not totally relevant in his conclusions. He completely avoids mention of profit taking through derivatives in the financial sectors those 2 critical years when commodity prices spiked and sank. Wall Street greed had more to do with setting agriculture commodity prices those years than the CBT.

Is it ethical for financial institutions to manipulate agricultural commodity prices solely for corporate profit outside the agricultural arena? Mr. Blank avoids mention of political policies that affect Canadian farmers' ability to guarantee at least cost of production.
Permalink Reply by Joann on April 29, 2010 at 7:20am
Sorry, I should have added that I thought he had some other very astute observations about the evolution of agriculture of which I agreed with.

Joann said:
I have not read any of Mr. Blanks' book, so I am gleaning personal opinions solely on his interview.

In my opinion, there were some serious omissions in his observations. He did not touch on the USA Farm Bill and the guaranteed support American farmers receive.. not to mention the Parity Clause farmers entrenched in the 1937(?) Farm Bill. The Canada Farm support system changed in 1998 from COP to a welfare system based on whole farm income.

He speaks of profit margins being squeezed with price fluctuations but neglects the relationship between farmers that capitalize their operations vs farmers with capital stagnation. Farmers with less/no debt have a far better survival rate. It is no small wonder the average age of Canadian farmers is well into the 60's.

The food versus ethanol point he extracts, in my opinion, is not totally relevant in his conclusions. He completely avoids mention of profit taking through derivatives in the financial sectors those 2 critical years when commodity prices spiked and sank. Wall Street greed had more to do with setting agriculture commodity prices those years than the CBT.

Is it ethical for financial institutions to manipulate agricultural commodity prices solely for corporate profit outside the agricultural arena? Mr. Blank avoids mention of political policies that affect Canadian farmers' ability to guarantee at least cost of production.
Permalink Reply by John Schwartzentruber on May 8, 2010 at 2:54am
Joann, while he does not make direct mention of the points you raise, I would say he covers them in general by saying that our control over the return on our production is eclipsed by global influences.

U.S. farm policy, for example, is just one more part (albeit a large one) of the global structure within which we must try to produce and survive.

Mainstream or conventional agriculture, which simply produces bountiful supplies of bulk commodities at insufficient prices for a nameless, faceless buyer will eventually collapse under the weight of it own "efficiency" because of the factors which Mr. Blank outlines.

I am reminded of the story of farmer who tried get his cow to eat less hay. Every day he gave her less than the day before. Since she continued to live, he thought, "Yes, this is working"!

She became thinner with each passing week, but still she lived on a decreasing amount of hay each day.

Eventually, the cow was a mere skeleton, but the farmer was happy because she was down to only one handful of hay per day.

One morning he was most remorseful to find her dead in her stall. "Why did you have to die now"? he said. "Because today I would have had you down to no feed at all and I would have proven to the world that a cow can live on nothing!"

I wish I were less pessimistic. But in view of what agriculture has become in my lifetime, do I have any reason to be?
Permalink Reply by Bristow on May 8, 2010 at 10:18am
Smart man, knows his stuff. I have notice this trend in all developed countries. In Australia in the 80s it was get big or get out, 90s sell the farm its not worth it, 2000 your too old and over supply. O well its back to being peasant farmers again. Small may better, find your local market, sell at the farm gate to indivual consumer or form co ops, to compete with mult nationals. Cut out the middle man, let him find his product some where else, two or three years down the track, he will be back, because the consumer don't like the new ingredance in the product.

▶ Reply to Discussion

RSS

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

Map: Prairie Dryness, Drought Little Changed in May

Abnormal dryness and drought across Western Canada were little changed in May compared to a month earlier. The latest monthly update of the Canadian drought monitor shows 19% of Prairie agricultural lands were being impacted by abnormally dry or drought conditions as of the end of May. That is 2 points higher than the end of April but slightly below 21% at the end of March and sharply below 47% in February. Much of the Prairie Region received below to well below normal precipitation in May, with the Peace Region, south-central Saskatchewan, and southern Manitoba recording less than 25% of normal. On the last day of the month, however, a large storm system in Alberta produced 40 to 80 mm of precipitation alone. In east-central Alberta up to 300% of normal monthly precipitation fell in the one day. Significant rainfall was also recorded in western regions of Saskatchewan but at lower levels than in eastern Alberta, the monitor said. Temperatures were generally below normal across

U.S. Soybean Ending Stocks Steady

U.S. soybean ending stocks – both old and new-crop - were left unchanged in USDA’s June supply-demand update on Thursday. For 2026-27, USDA made no changes to the U.S. soybean balance sheet this month. Estimated production remained at 4.435 billion bu, up 173 million from 2025-26, while the crush was held at 2.75 billion bu and exports at 1.63 billion. With no changes, forecasted 2026-27 U.S. soybean ending stocks were left steady from May at 310 million, modestly below the average trade guess of 314 million bu. The USDA also kept the 2026-27 season-average farm price unchanged at $11.40/bu, up from the 2025-26 estimate of $10.40. For old-crop 2025-26 soybeans, the USDA raised crush by 20 million bu, citing stronger soybean meal exports and domestic meal use, while soybean oil use for biofuel was also increased. However, exports were lowered by 20 million bushels based on available U.S. Census data, offsetting the increase in crush and leaving ending stocks unchanged at 340 mi

Only Modest Adjustments for Old-, New-Crop U.S. Corn

The USDA left its 2026-27 U.S. corn outlook virtually unchanged this month, with the only supply-side change a 3 million-bu increase tied to a higher import forecast carried in from the old-crop balance sheet. In its June supply-demand update on Thursday, USDA left 2026-27 U.S. corn production unchanged at 15.995 billion bu, while all major demand categories were also steady. Feed and residual use was held at 6.1 billion bu, food, seed and industrial use at 6.955 billion, including 5.6 billion for ethanol, and exports at 3.15 billion. With no change in use, the small increase in 2026-27 beginning supplies carried directly into ending stocks, which were raised 3 million bu from May to 1.96 billion, slightly above the average pre-report trade guess of 1.942 billion. The season-average farm price was unchanged at $4.40/bu. Corn futures were trading about 7-8 cents/bu lower this afternoon, following the report’s noon hour EST release. For old-crop 2025-26, USDA also made only mo

Don’t miss June 12 deadline: Share your feedback on the Beef Cattle Code of Practice

Public comment period nearing close on proposed updates to national beef cattle care standards.The Beef Code outlines expected and recommended animal care practices for beef cattle. The public comment period is an opportunity for anyone who has an interest in how beef cattle are raised in Canada, including consumers, veterinarians, food service professionals, and producers, to review the draft content and share feedback. Feedback gathered through the public comment period is critical and helps determine the content of the final document. Strong producer feedback from all regions of Canada is an important step in this process. The Beef Code is meant to drive continuous improvement in animal welfare and is built to be scientifically informed, practical, and reflect societal expectations for responsible farm animal care. The Code uses an outcome-based approach that focuses on achieving successful standards while allowing for flexibility in how these outcomes are met rather than dictati

From the Government Desk: ABP keeping up momentum

Spring is always one of the best times of year in this business. Calving is underway, seed is going into the ground, and there’s a sense of momentum heading into the grazing season. This year, that momentum also includes a few policy wins worth noting. Strychnine is back in 2026! After its approval was pulled in 2023, producers have been searching for a useful option to control infestations of Richardson’s ground squirrel. If you’re impacted, you’ll know why this is a meaningful development. The rollout is still underway, with initial access expected toward the end of May. For some, that timing will miss the most effective spring window, which is frustrating. There is expected to be another opportunity later in the summer, but it won’t fully replace what many producers were hoping for this spring. That said, getting this approval across the line was no small task. This was very much an Alberta-led effort, with strong collaboration between cropping groups and ABP to build the case. A

© 2026   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service