Ontario Agriculture

The network for agriculture in Ontario, Canada

On Site Ethanol Production using crop waste

I belive that on-site ethanol production using crop waste or even corn is one of the best alternative for ethanol production.  On site processing is easy and safe, it eliminates transportation costs and enables the use of various waste products not just the use of corn.  Systems that I am familiar with can produce 2 - 5 gallons of ethanol per hour and with the use of conversion kits that are on the market the ethanol can be used to operate DIESEL and Gasoline equipment.  I believe that on-site systems will help with Farm Sustainability with AG CO-OPs forming to process various waste crops and produce ethanol for a number of farms within the CO-OP and this will in turn increase the use of ethanol, thereby saving fuel expenses.

Views: 118

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Roadrunner on May 9, 2011 at 10:39am

Is there a website with any additional information?

I would think that you would need to have a certain size to make it worth your time.

2-5 gallons per hour would seem to be too small.

 

 

Permalink Reply by Richard Edmonds on May 10, 2011 at 5:46am

Hi Roadrunner

 

      I have found a couple of general websites for you.  The first talks about a company in Minnesota that has a modular biorefinery and can make at a minimum 500,000 gallons of ethanol per year.

http://blog.energy.gov/blog/2010/09/14/biorefinery-goes-mod-and-small

 

      The systems that my company is marketing in Canada is smaller, easier and less expensive that the one noted above, however, works on the same model.  The amount of ethanol you obtain per year depends on the amount of feedstock or waste that you have to process.  With our systems we help you set up the tanks for pretreatment of the waste and fermentation and then delivery to the distillation system which is sold separate from the tanks.  Based on the fermentation of the waste and the percentage of alcohol you obtain from your waste determines the amount of ethanol you can produce.  I noted 2 - 5 gallons per hour because that is what I thought a normal farm would want.

 

      How much Diesel fuel and gasoline do you use in a year.   My company is working with the University of Wisconsin on the use of ethanol in Diesel equipment using a dual fuel tank system with the ethanol injected into the combustion chamber separate from the Diesel.  Based on initial studies at the University of Wisconsin this dual fuel system can save at the least 50% of your Diesel expenses.

http://www.favstocks.com/reactivity-controlled-compression-ignition...

 

       My company website is out of date and being worked on at this time.  As soon as it is up I will post it.

▶ Reply to Discussion

RSS

Agriculture Headlines from Farms.com Canada East News - click on title for full story

TELUS investing $15 billion in British Columbia through 2029 to enhance connectivity, support Canadian AI leadership and fuel economic growth

TELUS is investing more than $15 billion over the next five years to expand and enhance its network infrastructure and operations across British Columbia. As Canada navigates a challenging economic environment and seeks to attract more investment in the country to stimulate growth, this commitment to the province's future will help fuel homegrown innovation and support the prosperity of urban and rural communities. This investment builds on an impressive track record, with TELUS having invested more than $66 billion in B.C. since 2000, and is part of a larger commitment to deploy a total of $70 billion by 2029 across Canada to boost productivity and support a robust national economy. "For more than 125 years, TELUS has been headquartered in Western Canada, building a legacy of advancing British Columbia's economic and social prosperity. Indeed, against a backdrop of macroeconomic uncertainty, TELUS stands as one of the few companies committing to bold, future-focused technology invest

Fall in Crop Receipts Helps Drag 2024 Farm Income Lower

The steepest fall in crop returns in more than two decades badly dented Canadian farm income last year, according to preliminary numbers released by Statistics Canada Wednesday. The federal agency pegged 2024 realized net income for Canadian farmers at $9.4 billion, down $3.3 billion or almost 26% from the previous year. That marked the largest year-over-year percentage decline in realized net income since 2018, when it tumbled 41% to $4.2 billion, mainly due to sharply higher farm expenses. Stripping cannabis out of the equation made the fall in realized net farm income a bit less steep – down 23% to $9.7 billion – although still significant. Realized net income is the difference between a farmer's cash receipts and operating expenses, minus depreciation, plus income in kind. Mainly the result of lower prices for most major grains and oilseeds, total Canadian crop receipts fell 6.2% to $52.1 billion in 2024, the largest percentage drop in crop receipts since 2003. Wheat (ex

Saskatchewan Seeding Reaches 88% Complete

Saskatchewan producers made good seeding progress again this past week, with most crops developing normally. Thursday’s crop report estimated provincewide seeding at 88% complete as of Monday, up from 72% a week earlier and ahead of the five- and 10-year averages of 82% and 85%. Rainfall was variable across the province with some producers in the southeast regions experiencing increased amounts. The highest reported rainfall was in the Weyburn area at 66 millimetres (mm). However, other areas reported dry, windy conditions, and topsoil moisture levels did show some erosion compared to a week earlier. Cropland topsoil moisture across the province was rated 4% surplus, 65% adequate and 27% short as of Monday, versus 6% surplus, 69% adequate, 22% short, and 3% very short the previous week. Fall cereals are currently rated at 89% normal crop development for this time of year, with 7% ahead and 4% behind normal. Spring cereals are estimated to be 73% normal with 13% ahead and 14% be

Trump tariffs mean fewer machinery purchases, higher costs for farmers

Ag equipment manufacturers had hoped to see sales volumes start to recover this year from the current slump, but those high expectations have been lowered by the negative yo-yo impact of U.S. tariff rates — and those tariffs will end up costing farmers in North America more for new machinery and parts, even here in Canada.

Canadian Farm Income Sees Sharp Decline

In 2024, Canadian farmers saw the biggest drop in realized net income since 2018 due to falling crop prices, reduced receipts, and rising interest and input costs.

© 2025   Created by Darren Marsland.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service